Just when peace dominates the agenda in Afghanistan and more than two-thirds of America chooses peace and an end to armed action there, should Pakistan widen its own ambit of war? There are stages in a war against insurgency that must alternate: armed action meant to garner space that must give a chance to politicians to engage in dialogue. It remains a politico-military imperative to seek space; always through inducement — economic benefit, share of power — both consequences of a dialogue, and when these fail or need a resurgence in commitment, some helpful coercion through armed action. Has Pakistan exhausted all other options that it must graduate to war?
America has fought its 10-year war and wishes to give peace a chance. President Barack Obama promised to his people to bring a closure to the unnecessary wars that America was engaged in — and Afghanistan has relegated to one such. He is ready to follow up on his promise and show to his people in an election year that war indeed is now over and the boys are on their way back home. When re-elected, he will then have the space to focus more on the economic front. He, therefore, has a plan that suits America and his own political strategy. However, does this suit Pakistan and is this its desired strategy as well?
Opening a front with Taliban Inc. when Pakistan is at its weakest is perhaps, not a good way forward. If indeed the most reasonable route to bringing peace through dialogue is pursued — and with some reasonable inducements the process can urge the foreign groups to find shelter back within their own mainstream — Pakistan’s own load may simply become more manageable without creating perpetual hostility among those who simply get sucked into an operation because of co-location. Such resident sentiment among people that inhabit Pakistan’s border regions can only be self-defeating in the long run. When Pakistan begins its own internal push against homegrown elements, inimical groups from across the border are more likely to jump in support of their targeted cousins setting the tribal regions aflame, once again. The Haqqanis then should be won over by dialogue, rather than be pushed to choose sides. A sensible strategy suggests leaving doors open before the final act.
The attack on the Kamra base is more likely the harbinger of the things to come in response to Pakistan’s intention of initiating operations in North Waziristan. More of these will happen including something that may be intended to embarrass Pakistan even further in the eyes of the world; it might even include something as dastardly as another Mumbai with consequences that can push a war between Pakistan and India. With most of the region on a short fuse, especially India, is that a risk that Pakistan can afford?
There is tactical resort and there is strategic sense; it is the latter that must govern our destiny — and timing is a part of it. Or else, the cost is borne by generations without recourse or remedy. The current state of the nation is in itself instructive to that end.
Published in The Express Tribune, August 27th, 2012.
COMMENTS (38)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@BruteForce: "Why Afghanistan when they can take over a nuclear power?
Over simplified and shallow analysis. They can't take over the nuclear power because that nuclear power is not Afghanistan.
@unbeliever: Thank you for pointing out that article. It is obvious that hate against other religions is not just something that is taught in schools but also a pre-requistite to enter civil services. Surely individual bigotry has not been stamped out in India either but at least India is moving in the correct direction. In Pakistan the extent of bigotry and intolerance is much higher to begin with and the entry criteria to the civil services explains why the state response to acts of bigotry is so weak.
they cant defeat the Taliban yet dream of conquering kashmir. I think my point is clear. Forget Kashmir save wht u got after partition.
@unbeliever: Thank you for pointing out to this article in The Dawn. Let me share with you my personal experience. Coming out of the Indian education system, where anyone hardly gets over 80% even in Maths and Science and 45 - 60 % in subjects as History, and arts was a high score. (I am talking about the education system in India 40 years ago when the pass mark was 30% i.e., you pass if you get overall 30%), it was an experience for me when I took a professional exam in UK. I had got answers for four questions wrong and my answers to the remaining two questions were just about 70% complete. The passing grade was 50%. I knew I had done very badly and have started to prepare to retake the exam. I was feeling so bad that I did not open the result transcripts when it arrived by mail. Just when I was planning to send the exam fee, by some chance I opened the transcript and was shocked that that I had actually passed the exam I took and got nearly 60% which was just above an average score but I had passed the exam. I could not believe my eyes. Only thing was that I had to start preparing for the next part of the exam and could take it 6 months later only. This was in UK and USA was another experience form me. This is when I learnt that the correct answer matters but more important is your logic and approach to the question. The examiners often review your calculations and notes scribbled on the sides. When they see that you had the right approach but made some silly error in calculation, you are not punished that much.
@unbeliever: Thank you - had missed that article. Truly shocking.
@Polpot: @Indian Wisdom: @Raj - USA: .....MAY I INVITE YOU ALL and other indians to read an article published in todays dawn under the heading.....CIVIL SERVICE IN PAKISTAN.....just read the article and go through the questions which were asked in the examinations. and then perhaps, it would be easier for us to understand, why even the former bureaucrats, and civil service officers are not that pragmatic as is expected from a normal bureaucrat.
I will suggest all the retired army generals and officers from all the three armed forces - Army, navy, air force to get together, form a committee and meet General Kayani and his team and convince them not to follow America and think about Pakistan.
When Pakistan Army undertook successful operations in Swat and South Waziristan, the border across was not sealed by the ISAF / Afghan forces. Consequently, most of the terrorists went into Afghanistan, are being harbored by hostile intelligence agencies and now operating against Pakistan from safe havens. Operation in North Waziristan would meet the same fate. If USA is sincere in elimination of terrorists from North Waziristan, they must seal-off the border, an undertaking they have refused on grounds of lack of resources. Their intent is to use Pakistan for weakening the Haqqanis so that they can be brought to the negotiating table. @Zoro : Your contention that "Only weak party negotiates" is misplaced because for last so many months Americans are trying hard to negotiate with the Taliban with little success. In fact, they have been arm-twisting Pakistan to 'persuade' the Taliban to come on the negotiation table but even Pakistan has its limits. And mark my words, the USA will ultimately have a negotiated settlement with the Taliban, after all the latter fought on their behalf during the eighties.
@Hunter Punter man fear that day. Every Pakistani nuke has a love affair with India. Fear the day when they will be unleashed on you and your first strike capability will be even marginalized. Your Bhindi land from most densely populated to more scarcely populated in the world in matter of minutes.
The war hysteria is created by Media who are ready to serve their masters at any time any where. It is evident that despite so much pressure Pakistan army didnt initiated operation in North Waziristan and continued to do so. Why then making so much fuss about? No operation in Waziristan is being initiated period.
Lets see another scenario.
Pakistan doesn't attack North Waziristan, is isolated and blamed by the World. Sanctions and trade embargoes will ensue. Pakistan is already bankrupt, even IMF and WB will not lend a penny unless US approves it. That is the economics part.
Lets come to the security part. Pakistan has lost the World, what if the snakes that Pakistan refused to defang start biting the hand that fed them? No one in the World will come forward to help Pakistan and the Taliban would have grown stronger with their victory over a Super Power.
Why Afghanistan when they can take over a nuclear power?
In spite of being fiercely anti militant and wishing to see them wiped off the face of earth, I cannot help but sympathize with the Author's reservations. On the other hand I see my army as perhaps the only army in world who having lost thousands of soldiers (more than combined total of all wars), seen its vital installations attacked brazenly and even watching the videos of beheaded soldiers cannot spring into decisive action. I am sure the young officers of our brave Army must be wringing their hands in frustration. I for one weep at their impotence. This is truly a Hobson's choice. One thing is for sure. Any action in North Waziristan must not be a stand alone adventure. It must be accompanied by purging of all sympathizers of militants from civil and military bureaucracy, curtailment of civil liberties, massive media campaign, public rallies (never had one), framing of Anti Terrorist laws (like USA / India / Israel) and possibly imposition of emergency to take care of backlash. We must take a leaf out of General Mc Arthur in 1950's in response to real and perceived communist threat to USA. Lets follow USA example of {You are with us or against us}. All politicians / officers / writers / intellectuals / TV anchors etc etc should be told to choose between Taliban or civil society with all its imperfections. No confusion / no ambiguity or dilly dallying. Otherwise it will be a sure recipe for disaster as feared by the Author.
Another mumbai type operation, will find the whole world finally take on pakistan and disarm it of its nukes and weapons and the start of the dismemberment of the country. One mumbai has had awful consequences for pakistan, another will surely be disasterous for the state. That is something pakistan's amry clearly understands.
This author is so much confused. In his earlier articles he has claimed that TTP is working on RAW agenda. Now he thinks that TTP will enact another Mumbai attack.Many in Pakistan have also claimed that Kamra attack by TTP was India's work as it India stands to benefit most from the destruction of the surveillance aircrafts at the base. Had the author not brought in Indian and Mumbai attacks it would have made an useless reading. By bringing in Mumbai attacks and India and Mumbai attacks he has mede it an utter rubbish.
@BlackJack: Agreed 100%. Why is the writer threatening another Mumbai as an excuse against any action in Waziristan???
@Anas Abbas: I really don't wish the war comes to your home. Only then you will understand. The Pakistan army has always fought others' wars and owns them. And the ones that it has fought in the name of Pakistan, namely against India, were all misadventures, and major setbacks. The Waziristan operation(s) will be another failure. But that's not all -- the fallout from this failure will be even bigger.
The Ex Soilder is afraid it seems ... that what ever decisions were taken in his tenure ... are turning sour ... Only weak party negociates ... and thats what Pakistan is now ... Pakistan will have to take what its given ... Unless u again start with your nuclear blackmail ... Even that is being taken care off ...by USA and India ...
"Opening a front with Taliban Inc. when Pakistan is at its weakest is perhaps, not a good way forward" ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Pakistan...weakest? What did the countrymen sacrifice largest part of their national budget for? A military that that has gobbled up most of national resources and yet claims "weakness" ? Defeatist Mindset.
Writ of one Government must prevail across the entire country including FATA and Karachi and at all costs. History tells us that one cannot negotiate with brain-washed terrorists, because they only understand the language of force. Pakistan Government must bring all of its power and resources to accomplish the task. Sooner the better and easier
"More of these will happen including something that may be intended to embarrass Pakistan even further in the eyes of the world; it might even include something as dastardly as another Mumbai with consequences that can push a war between Pakistan and India. "
Your obsession with Mumbai is fascinating and then you accuse any of us Indians upset about Mumbai as people on RAW pay rolls.
But please tell me: 1) Are you actually threatening that North Waziristan operation by Pakistan army - an operation which has nothing to do with India) will be retaliated by a terrorist attack on India? 2) I thought these Pakistani believed that TTP who is the object of such an operation were Indian tools. So if the Pakistan army attacks them, would they not seek arms and reinforcements from their supposed paymasters, why would they instead attack their paymasters? 3) Is the only reason that you think Mumbai was wrong is because it embarrasses Pakistan? No concern for the 166 innocent people who were mercilessly killed?
Shahzad Sahab - There is a good probability that you will get a lot of heat for your position on ET. But it is good to see your thoughts on the issue. I agree with you. There is no question that we need to settle the issue of militants for good but for that to happen we need to operate from the position of strength. First, acquire the resources to nail the militants, second disengage with US to the extent that Pakistan's army does not come across as client army but embodiment of the will of people of Pakistan, thirdly engage in dialogue to give militants the last option, and fourthly, go after those who fail to comply. But military operation should be part of the broader well thought out strategy and not the only move up our sleeve.
It would be utterly foolish to start operation in north waziristan just when US elections are around the corner in november and pakistan's elections in january. Better to negotiate with taliban than launch pakistan into another civil war like it happened in 2009. It will only backfire and lead to death of both military and civilians. Does Pakistan want to be sucked into a civil war like in Iraq or Syria? I hope not. Pakistan army should not be provoked by kamra and other attacks to be pushed into a new war because this new war could lead to the breakup of pakistan where NATO could jump in also under the pretext of fighting haqqanis and taking out pakistan's nuclear assets. Understand the real intentions of our foreign enemies.
Author " Has Pakistan exhausted all other options that it must graduate to war?" Oh for God sake show some mercy to your poor country men who have given their blood and sweat for you to defend them from enemy.How much bloodshed you need more to justify a war against armed criminals.Pakistan has no options left but to go for war.How many peace accords how much restraints has pakistan not done with these criminals what are the results of these peace accords and restraints ?-After every peace accords and show up of restraints has the enemy emerged stronger than before. When America talks of war it's a conspitacy in your's eye and when America talks about some kind of settelment it becomes a precident. what a duplicity! Why do you forget that enemy is siting on our soil not on Americn soil.Had any civalised state allowed even a single person to indulged in debate to and write lengthy analysis so as -War or no war.It happens only in pakistan Because enemy has weaken Pakistan.No dialouge but war- and without further delay is the only option.
So when is the timing right? The fact of the matter is that things are going to get messy. The problem is such that there will never be an easy solution. Talking peace with ideologically- driven miltants is not smart- we saw what happened in Swat. Perhaps the writer should have focused on advising his fellow servicemen not to create the monster we are dealing with now. No way out.The military needs to bury it's monster child - once and for all.
What will happen is there for everybody to see.
2014 America leaves Afghanistan keeping a small force behind. Like the great Bhishma of Mahabharat who took a vow to protect Hastinapur and did not stop Draupati from being disrobed, America will protect Kabul and Kabul only and will not care what will happen to Kandahar. Northern Afghanistan is now better trained and better equipped than before and will resist Taliban. Taliban can occupy only southern Afghanistan. These Afghan areas will also be used by the anti Pakistan Taliban like the TTE. From there they will attack Pakistan.
Now the fight will be limited to Waziristan, from 2014 the war zone will be the whole of southern Afghanistan. Which means before America leaves Pakistan has to finish off TTE and the likes.
Another important point: In 1996 the on-the-ground officers of the Pakistan army had joined the army before Zia-ul-Haq. Eighteen years later the present on-the-ground officers have come out of the Zia culture and will be more sympathetic to Taliban. Which in other words means they will be reluctant to fight the Taliban.
Hence I will say as I said before and ET had printed them many times: Day of reckoning for Pakistan is the day America leaves Afghanistan.
Fairly predictable op-ed - some interesting points: 1. Or, shall Pakistan have to contend with a more cumulative reaction from the combined strength of Taliban Inc.. So the Pakistan army is not capable of defeating its one time creation? Truly the times have changed. It is sad when high-ranking ex-officers attempt to justify brazen attacks on strategic military bases by blaming their own defense policy. 2. ...and with some reasonable inducements the process can urge the foreign groups to find shelter back within their own mainstream... - Why the diplomatic doubles-speak AVM sb? You mean that you will send them back over the border to attack Afghanistan once the Americans leave - still up to the same old tricks I see. 3. ...it might even include something as dastardly as another Mumbai with consequences that can push a war between Pakistan and India. This is really interesting - are you indicating that the Taliban are going to attack India now? This is ridiculous and you know it. Or is it that an attack on N Waziristan is likely to inflame homegrown terrorist organizations as well as rogue elements of the Pak army and ISI into mounting yet another major attack on India with the objective of pushing both states towards war. Here prevention will require a major cleansing and course correction that is no way linked to the N Waziristan operation, and is also highly unlikely given Pakistan's current track record. However, that is another battle that Pakistan will end up having to fight either now or sometime in the future.
peace is given the chance when you find unable to control them . Military operation in SWAT finally cleared the valley from militants . There had not been an operation in North Waziristan because the Army was considering them as their asset to be used for strategic uses. Now this illusion has been shattered so by military operation they can be controlled. those terrorist s have caused the death of more than40.000 Pakistani civilians/ soldiers and there is no reason to believe that they will cease to continue their extremist activities. militants do not stand anywhere near the army in terms of intelligence, organisation and fire power., It will be foolishness to deal with them softly.
The problem with your position is, Pakistan is not going to be allowed to decide this by itself. If Pakistan doesn't soon take out the Haqqanis, the US will, with ground operations if necessary.
Dialogue it is... instead of spending millions on war, spend money on Schools, Hospitals and infrastructure..
If you have not realized yet after 65 years of misery, that the line of thinking you are constantly propagating is the root cause of gradual state failure we are witnessing. For a change, let us listen to the world and saner voices within, and root out the source of lawlessness. Pakistan has nothing to lose more than it already has, i.e., credibility, security, economy, respect, human dignity, the list is long and painful! Enough of obfuscation in the name of security and strategy. Please!
Pakistan has to bite the bullet and peruse the Taliban out of existence. It must not make a distinction between good Taliban and bad Taliban. The only good Taliban is the dead one. If Pakistan genuinely goes after all terrorists there is no reason for India to start a war with Pakistan. The region will have a sigh of relief and peace will break out.
Rubbish. Maybe it's a simple as Pakistan acknowledging that it doesn't have the influence to bring peace to the region and knows that once the American's leave terrorism is going to accelerate. Maybe the Generals have decided that a major military push into the tribal territories is the only way of gaining the upper ground on these terrorist (TTP or otherwise) and that doing so with the Americans helping is better than doing so down the line when the American's are gone.
Matter of time before AVM saab would be trotted out to offer excuses. Let the body count rise!! The powers that be make statements that Pakistans sovereignty will never be compromised, no compromise on defence...but then we have the excuse makers to come and explain why we are letting a bunch of thugs control large parts of our country.
According to your analysis we are at our weakest point. In this situation, enemy would negotiate surrendering terms only. Are we ready for that?
Useless article with another attemp to mislead the viewers. Americans are giving peace a chance but that is drastically differnet to the peace deal options that have already been experimented by pakistan. American way of peace deal to demand the terrorists/taliban to abandon thier arms, accept afghan constitution and share information regarding al qaeda. also america demands an independent body to monitor the process of weapon abandonment. This is the reason why peace process is so difficult to implement because the taliban are not ready for any body to monitor them and they do not belive in any constitution other than thier puritanical version of sharia. on the other hand the way pakistan formed peace deals with terrorists is rediculous. Pakistan always makes it easier for terrorists and in all peace treaties there was never a mechanism to ensure terrorists following the terms of agreement. Its the last chance pakistan has now either to fight terrorists or to live in isolation and declare itself the backbone of terrorism.