The drama stemming from the leaking of sheaf after sheaf of sensitive documents, including diplomatic cables sent out by the US, continues. Julian Assange, the founder of the Wikileaks website on which the information revealing the truth to the world about murky politics played out globally, continues to occupy centre stage in this piece of theatre. Since June this year, Assange has been holed up at the Ecuadorian embassy in London, after seeking asylum in the South American nation.
For two months, things had appeared to be at a standstill, but they have now moved forward dramatically. Assange’s asylum request has been accepted by Ecuadorian President Rafael Correa this month; the Australian’s gambit in picking Ecuador — apparently based on a friendly interview with Correa and the president’s open distaste for the US — seems to have paid off. But both Sweden and the UK are not pleased. Sweden has been seeking Assange’s extradition on sexual assault charges, which the Wikileaks’ founder denies. He is also convinced that extradition to Sweden would be followed by a move to hand him over to the US for trial on the Wikileaks affair. London has said that it is bound by law to respect Sweden’s extradition request and will not allow Assange safe passage out of the country. Ecuador has interpreted this as an assault on its sovereignty and also criticised a warning issued from London stating that the Ecuadorian embassy could be stripped of its diplomatic status and a police raid made to net Assange.
An affair that began with a few leaked documents has turned into a global crisis. The Ecuadorian parliament has backed the presidential decision and 11 South American nations are meeting to discuss the matter. The question of free expression seems to have got lost in the midst of this scenario, since so many other complexities have emerged, which are increasingly hard to unravel. For now, Assange’s future remains uncertain, and it is hard to say what his final fate will be.
Published in The Express Tribune, August 19th, 2012.
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
I absolutely LOVEEE Assange. I think he's just fabulous. Rock on J.A :)
Of course I meant its motives are anything but lawful
This move is as political as it can get. The guy is not a political player and Sweden is not a dictatorship. It is one of the few countries holding the values of law and justice. WE should not compare Assange with Musharaf or any other have been usurpers of power. Ecuador must release him and not interfere with justice. Its motives are anything but unlawful according to international laws.
Since extradition can not take place without a treaty between two parties (states) concerned, can any scholar of international law tell me if there is such a treaty between Swedish government and Britain.