Dr Arsalan-Malik Riaz case: Supreme Court stops JIT probe in its tracks

NAB’s inquiry barred till court decides a petition questioning partiality۔


Azam Khan August 01, 2012

ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court has barred a joint investigation team (JIT) from probing the alleged underhand transactions between real-estate developer Malik Riaz and the chief justice’s son, Dr Arsalan Iftikhar.

A two-member bench of the apex court on Tuesday ordered the JIT to suspend its investigations till the court decides a petition questioning alleged partiality of the investigators.

The bench also turned down a request from NAB Prosecutor General KK Agha for a larger bench to hear Dr Arsalan’s review petition.

Sardar Ishaq, counsel for Dr Arsalan, tried to convince the bench that some JIT members would have an apparent bias against his client since they were closely associated with Malik Riaz and were also previously affected by his father’s – the chief justice’s – rulings.

On the request of Attorney General Irfan Qadir, the NAB chairman had constituted a five-member JIT to probe Malik Riaz’s charges against Dr Arasalan.

Justice Jawwad S Khawaja, during Tuesday’s hearing, observed that apparently the AG had violated court orders by asking the government to “set the state machinery in motion” by only choosing NAB for this purpose and supervising the investigation himself.

The court adjourned the case till August 2.

Published in The Express Tribune, August 1st, 2012.

Our Publications

COMMENTS (10)

Mohd Butt | 8 years ago | Reply

Those preach must watch what the says as people will judge them by their words, arslan you got 900 million, by which magic? Under investigation, you can run but can not hide, what will you do when your father is no more CJ. Some uncles will oblige you? CJ must conceive that his son is a cheat and not businessman sorry for that but it s fact.

khaleeq nazar | 8 years ago | Reply

What is judicial terrorism?

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ