Drone programme will not change Afghan outcome: Expert

Michael Krepon notes that the US drone programme has resulted in greater anger among Pakistanis than that for India.


June 15, 2012

WASHINGTON: The US drone programme, which conducts aerial strikes against suspected militant targets in tribal areas, will not only ultimately fail to influence the outcome of an Afghan settlement, but also severely tarnish America's image in Pakistan, an American expert stressed in a newspaper opinion piece.

Michael Krepon, who is the Director and co-founder of the South Asian Program at the Stimson Center, noted in The Washington Post that Afghanistan's future matters more critically to Pakistan than to the United States.

"Afghanistan's future matters much more to Pakistan than to the United States. This elemental truth is forgotten in US deliberations about how best to leverage Pakistan to achieve a political settlement in Afghanistan," he noted.

About the unmanned predator drone strikes, which the US regularly carries out against militant targets, the expert noted they have only succeeded in casting the US in a more negative light than even longtime arch rival India. "These strikes will ultimately fail to influence the outcome of an Afghan settlement, but they have already succeeded in making the United States more hated in Pakistan than India."

Islamabad has repeatedly denounced drone attacks on its tribal areas as counterproductive to the overall fight against terror, and that such unilateral actions violate the country's sovereignty and provoke militancy.

Human rights activists have also condemned drone strikes for the high number of civilian casualties. The Obama administration claims drones are important in taking out al Qaeda linked militants.

In the Post, Krepon wrote that Pakistan wants a government in Kabul that, after most of US troops withdraw in 2014, will be friendlier to it than India. He said Pakistani resolve is rooted in the assumption that, if India gains a strong foothold in Afghanistan, then Pakistan's largest and most resource-rich province, Balochistan, would be ripe for an India-supported insurgency.

COMMENTS (17)

G. Din | 11 years ago | Reply

@Bilal: "@cautious you are Indian correct,,, People like you are doing their best create difference b/w Pakistan and US. and we know it very well." No one needs to do anything to create animosity between Pakistan and any other entity in the world. Pakistan has the proven capability to accomplish that all by itself. You tried your best to create hatred between India and US for better part of your existence. Were you successful? Tell us, do you have any meaningful relations any government/state/country/people in this world? Even those entities you yourself created, the Taliban of various shades, are now attacking you. No matter how hoarse you might cry, even the "deeper, higher, wider, narrower friend" would much rather no one sees them standing beside you. Pakistanis are consumed with self-hate which comes out in the form of terrible relations with everyone else and even between themselves! For your information (if you did not guess) I am also a proud Indian. Does that change any facts?

Freeman | 11 years ago | Reply

@Cautious: @Iron hand:

You both never came to Paksitan so you don't know about the Pakistani's so you have not right to comment about what Paksitani think about America.

You both have mind set about the Paksitani's but remember these days will over soon for Paksitan and you people who are war mongers and killing supporters of innocent people will see the result of this illegal drone killing soon.

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ