In this leaked off-camera footage, Bokhari and Lucman openly discuss and plan the interview questions with the interviewee — controversy’s new child — Malik Riaz. The two Dunya News anchors (Lucman has since been ‘suspended’) blatantly jettison their professional integrity by letting Riaz control the content and flow of their supposed ‘interrogation’. In fact, in the video, Bokhari admits that the interview is “planted”, but cautions that “no one must know about it”. Ironically, there are few who probably don’t know about the interview by now, since the leaked footage has spread like wildfire on social media. The general public is disgusted by the power struggles in the country, which also embroil high-profile journalists. It’s a shame that those who supposedly question and point fingers at others on the nation’s behalf have sullied consciences and unclean hands themselves.
Let’s not fool ourselves — we need to really understand that completely bias-free journalism doesn’t exist anywhere in the real world. Whatever we see on our screens — often posited as the revelation of the ultimate sach — is tainted with subjectivity on many levels. This is a fact that needs to be accepted because in the world of journalistic inquiry, objectivity is, more often than not, a myth.
But what really complicates matters is that the media in this country (and in many others too) is a muddled game of money and power — media houses are often funded by big businesses and may even have strong political connections. Thus, it’s no surprise that several prominent journalists are actually hand-in-glove with businessmen and politicians. In fact, the ‘hard talk’ we see on TV channels, is in many cases, favourable airtime for powerful people. And now this leaked video has proven that anything will get a slot on TV if the price paid is a good one.
In India, where a troika of power exists between journalists, businessmen and politicians, a similar incident took place a couple of years ago. In 2010, senior journalists Barkha Dutt and Vir Sanghvi were implicated in a scandal after tapes of their phone conversations with an influential corporate lobbyist Niira Radia were released. In a phone conversation with Radia, Sanghvi offered a completely scripted interview to India’s business magnate Mukesh Ambani. So, what explanation did Sanghvi give to clear his name? That he was merely ‘stringing her along’ to get information out of her.
Bokhari, too, aired an explanation — but one which was predictably unconvincing — to silence her detractors. But there was one important rhetorical question she raised: which journalist or anchor doesn’t have connections with politicians, generals, judges and businessmen? It’s not the partisanship of the journalists in our country, however, that is bothersome. It’s rather the act that they put up — the feigned interrogation, the exhibition of moral uprightness, the zeal for truthful inquiry — that’s highly unethical.
This isn’t the first time that TV anchors have been shamefully exposed on social media and certainly won’t be the last. But soon, this incident will lapse from public memory. Sadly, American philosopher George Santayana’s saying — “those who do not learn from the past are condemned to repeat it”— fits our condition aptly. And so, as we conveniently forget, we now wait for another video, another scandal, another expose.
Published in The Express Tribune, June 16th, 2012.
COMMENTS (21)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@observer:
Maria looks young and must be looking for some guidance from the big neighbour with vast experience in such matters. The thing to do both for the school educated ones and the so called elite in Pakistan to day is to ape India in everything. It is "in India, they have done this", "In India they will do this", and "In India they would have done this". No escaping from this dependence.
What exactly is the issue here?
Looks like people are getting all stiff about Malik Riaz being coached and being asked easy questions.
All you need to do is, Summon him to the Court. Ask him the same questions, even tougher questions on oath.
Convict him, if he is lying.
But be prepared. May be he is telling the truth. Then what?
@Maria Waqar
In India, where a troika of power exists between journalists, businessmen and politicians,a similar incident took place a couple of years ago.
There are so many things India has-Secularism,a Constitution, regular elections, civilian supremacy etc- which Pakistan refuses to copy .
Why this sudden desire to ape India?
@Ejaaz: I agree Primary job of all corporations is make money all over the world.media in our country is famous for that. U can predict who will say what? Some media personal have strong hatred for minorities whether nationalities and religious. I can quote some examples One comedian passed inappropriate remark against Lord shiva. I am Muslim and expect every one to respect my beliefs but I respect every one's belief as strong as mine. One anchor is very good but he is hypernationalist and presented three programs on Mumbai attacks. Even When kasabs father came on TV he continued to deny him being Pakistani. One anchor presented a program a night before election of Pindi against man from Lal haveli. Anchors speak against Ahmadi openly and deny them even basic human right
Basically pakistani society is hicjaked by the ruling elite. All the institutions have failed. Even some paid journalists sing democractic songs. My question how come a person becomes president with 10 years in Jail? When the Govt of the same person was kicked in 90's on corruption charges...That their horses eat JAMS & walnuts. How he entered again ? NO LAW TO CHECK from any institution either from SC, Election commission, or agencies. In this scenerio I can only say Good-luck pakistan
@ Author:
"But what really complicates matters is that the media in this country (and in many others too) is a muddled game of money and power — media houses are often funded by big businesses and may even have strong political connections."
I kinda started liking your articles since you wrote "I’m still proudly ghairatmand", although I myself like to be a pragmatist and realist, but still being "proudly beghairat" is something I couldn't subscribe to. Again you produced a good article for the enlightenment of the ignorant, but for the astute readers there was nothing new. After watching the subject interview and the off-air content, I started feeling some kind of sympathy with Mubashir and Bukhari (in-spite of my dislike for the guys) as there was nothing strange accept for the calls of PM's son and Maryam Nawaz
@Rise n Shine:
"Coming to the Pakistani media, the only thing about it that i find really offensive (and its not the fervent nationalism) is the disrespect shown toward Hindus and Hinduism. Its one thing to dislike a country, whatever the reasons be, quiet another to spew the kind of supremacist bigoted venom that the mullah’s and anchors do."
You should have given some thought and tried to find out the reasons why Pakistani media is so disrespectful to Hindus. Here are the few reasons:
1- Because of the uglier attitude displayed by the Indian media as well as the general public, predominantly Hindus, towards Pakistan and the people of Pakistan.
2- The role of India in breaking Pakistan during 1970's and her current involvement with TTP and BLA.
3- India's consistent failure to resolve any dispute with Pakistan through peaceful means, instead she chose to linger on by using deceitful rounds of talks to gain time in the hope that the issue will die down with the passage of time.
Like every Pakistani I was also shocked after watching this interview, the reason was that every Pakistani believes that Media is the only SYSTEM who might cares about the public, the representatives of media are might not corrupt. But now everyone could immagine how immaculate media is. Now to whom should we listen, to whom should we belive? I think the only and the last support for us is the cheif Justice and the Supreme court. As the writter has mentioned that we will forget this irksome truth about media after few days but what if we do not ?
Good and balanced attempt to expose media stalwarts/tycoons who claim to be "Larry King" of the country
@Asad: 'the' bigotry, not 'and'. Sorry.
Are we saying that we are shocked and amazed that a TV talk show was 'tweaked' and the anchors and the guest had come to an understanding on the format involved ?? I doubt it.
@Asad: So constructive criticism is off the table, and you accept and endorse and bigotry and hate mongering of your media.
@Rise n Shine: If you don't like it you don't have to watch it.
good article.
I am surprised that so many are surprised on this set up. Most interviews with imp people are arranged and the questions are conveyed and approved by them. Even in the US election debates between candidates all questions and positions/angles and other details are approved prior to each debate. If the candidate has a bald spot he does not want to show that, the shorter candidate does not want the other to come close, etc. In all this talk the truth is lost in the interview. Was he telling the truth or lies?
Some just do not know how to wash their dirty laundry in their own backyard. There are more Lucmans and Bukharis in the fold.
Who cares if the interview was scripted? That is to be expected. The real question is what is true and what is false in what Malik Riaz is saying? How come the Chief Justice who can sit on judgement of everything corrupt in the country had no clue how his son accumulated nearly a billion (and that is with a B) rupees in just four years? How come the Chief Justice never asked his wife and his son where the money was coming from for all the trips and all the shopping in London? And that after the last dictator had already pointed it out and even Aitzaz had brought it to the Chief Justices notice. And now these PCO judges want to cover their corruption by passing a gag order? By a short notice that say that the judges are at no fault? Why does not the Chief justice explain what was he thinking about the wealth of his son? Does it say anything about the CJ's judgement?
Great piece!
I think this is the case because media is not seeking to be 'protected'. There is no lobbying by media personalities to work 'against the tide'. I believe that even those voices that do in fact want to show case the truth are 'silenced' by the above mentioned power politics and would 'play along'. Or maybe I am being too optimistic. Maybe in fact, every body just wants their piece of the cake. However, if a lobby did exist that works against this power politics within the media- our media would be in a much better shape.
Right on the 'buck' you are. Sadly. In India the media seems to possess more power than the politicians. Before any elections here, be it local, state or national elaborate rate cards are printed and forwarded to different political parties. Many newspapers offer positive editorials for a price. It seems every inch of print space or air time is up for sale. The same is true for many networks and newspapers in the US. Coming to the Pakistani media, the only thing about it that i find really offensive (and its not the fervent nationalism) is the disrespect shown toward Hindus and Hinduism. Its one thing to dislike a country, whatever the reasons be, quiet another to spew the kind of supremacist bigoted venom that the mullah's and anchors do.
That how our society has become unfortunately. We don't seem to get moved by anything. Be it suicide bombings, be it scandals a.k.a gates, be it governance. We will all be dying for holding our political "leaders" banners some months later knowing that these politicians looted us, stripped us off the basic necessaries of life.
We seem to care a lot more about our "leaders" & their children than our country & our countrymen and even our own children.
This country will change only when people living here stop forgetting things.