There has been an active anti-American industry in Pakistan, which has instituted hatred against America in popular perception. All this while, Pakistan, as state policy, was aligned with the US on the battlefield and was sacrificing on the fronts, as well as in its cities inside its territory. In contrast, the Americans have been tardy in how they have gone about contesting this space and managing perceptions. They have either been too arrogant with their couldn’t- care-less approach, or too transparent with their attempts to win over some focal power brokers without worrying about how the public space was being lost. Such is the cavalier abandon that tends to ride America’s policy formulation.
The rubs between America and Pakistan are many: the failing venture in Afghanistan with its rather poorer cousin called ‘relative gain’ replacing the much vaunted ‘finite victory’ that should have been the goal of a superpower; the incapacity of the political structure in Afghanistan to withstand the aftershock of a departing America; a Pakistan that will not bid against the Haqqanis on America’s behalf; and an environment in a drift that sees another American expedition coming to a close, while the promised dialogue with the Taliban faltering before it even got going.
America will have a lot to answer to history for its current misadventure: taking its ‘eyes off the ball’ via the Iraqi diversion; a mismatch of policy within the US establishment that never let a unified approach take effect in Afghanistan; and, mishandling a key coalition partner in Afghanistan. Many trillions later, it is the junior partner Pakistan that must carry the blame.
What of the Haqqanis? One, Osama, Mullah Omar and Haqqani, arrived in Pakistan from Afghanistan — they weren’t nestled here from the start. Two, the Pakistani military had a war imposed on them not of their making; Pakistan owned another country’s war despite intense domestic opposition to it. Three, the war spawned heinous sublets when splinter groups assembled under the banner of the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) and threatened Pakistan’s state and society and continue to do so. Four, Pakistani troops deployed in Fata equal the cumulative force from 48 nations that is fighting the same extended adversary in Afghanistan. Five, the operations in Swat, South Waziristan and the continuing battles in Orakzai and Khyber agencies; frequent forays into Pakistan by the TTP fugitives from their Afghan havens; and, a sprinkling of unilateral American assaults, all form the operational scene relentlessly engaging the Pakistani military. Pakistan, never ready for such a form of war, has nevertheless, learnt the ropes quickly. In a mosaic as complicated as this, the Haqqanis are a minor irritant.
In 2010, US President Barack Obama unveiled his vision for Afghanistan. It centred around dialogue as the most prudent option to end this war. That is also when the Kerry-Lugar-Berman bill was arranged for $1.5 billion to come Pakistan’s way to provide it succour in the face of the war that it had been subjected to. The pittance came with unstinted additional pressure to ‘do more’. More for the way the war was heading to a closure than the monies involved, Pakistan did not find it prudent to initiate a new front in North Waziristan, especially since the intent was to seek peace. There was no way that Pakistan could push itself into a war that was likely to keep it embroiled even after the US had finished its war. It is naive of the US to expect Pakistan to open more fronts in North Waziristan. Instead, Pakistan will wait for the conditions to become conducive for the foreign elements to return to Afghanistan. Then it shall be for their own country to deal with them as it pleases; Pakistan is not about to fight another nation’s war, anymore.
Published In The Express Tribune, June 13th, 2012.
COMMENTS (30)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@DB
The level of terrorism is down in Pakistan today because in part of the fight against TTP but also because of the influence of the Haqqanis.
By this ligic, handing over Pakistan to the Haqqanis will ensure evelasting peace. So, when is the new President being sworn in?
Right on. Not.
@US Centcom: The US and Pakistan need to work on common issues that can bring about peace in the region and also uplift the Pakistani education and economic system.
But I am afraid things are not going to be easy!
Lust of power and the desire to win a war brings strange bedfellows together. Pak-US and Pak-china both fall in the same category. Pakistan was more than a willing partner in Afghan war. Terrorists/ Mujahids from all over the world we being trained in Pakistan and then pushed into Afghanistan. Entire population of Pakistan considered these Afghan Mujahids their esteemed guests. These very esteemed guests are bringing the trouble to Pakistan. Guests have a strong lobby now in Pakistan. Guests are dreaming to become owners now. Story is very similar to East India company which came for trading and ended up becoming the owner.
Dear @US Centcom:
It is much more imperative from Pakistan's point of view that the drug dealing, corrupt terror network of the Norther Alliance which is sitting in Kabul be dismantled. They are a threat to their own people and to Pakistan with their declared intentions of taking over parts of Pakistan for Greater Afghanistan.
Thank you
Conspiracy theories have been circling the air ever since the beginning of the WOT. The thing to realize is that we are approaching a crucial phase in the WOT. It is extremely important for both nations to be on the same page for the sake of achieving our common objectives. We simply cannot allow our common enemies to gain the upper hand by failing to overcome our differences. At the end of the day, we are two partner nations working towards a common goal of defeating terrorism. Therefore, it is not unusual for one partner to strategize and make recommendations against the common threat. The intelligence has clearly pointed towards the terrorist groups like the Haqqani network in the past. And it’s in the benefit of the region to see terrorist groups like the Haqqani network dismantled and stopped from infiltrating the region with their acts of terror. And yes, we have asked Pakistan to do more on its sides of the border, but that only goes to show that the U.S. fully respects Pakistan’s independence and sovereignty, and doesn’t doubt Pakistan’s ability to uproot the elements of terrorism. Our nations are hard at work in trying to resolve our differences, and we have no doubt that our common interests will prevail over everything else.
Finally something that is balanced....
Excellent As usual from Sir Shahzad Chaudhry
Pakistan will not give up on Haqanni network and USA will not cease the drone strikes. War of nerves I say. Pakistan does not have the technological or Military might to turn it in its favour. Result - a lost generation sacrificed on the altar of false pride.
"Pakistani military had a war imposed on them not of their making; Pakistan owned another country’s war despite intense domestic opposition to it."
There might have been intense domestic opposition to it. But the military was in its favour. The military didn't have a war imposed on it. They joined the war on terror to get all the military aid they could get from US.
Writer is spot on and made straight points. If US after over a decade, its very silly to think its haqqnanis who control afghanistan. They may be one of the groups operating in Afghanistan, certainly not that powerful. This is more to do with saving face and blame everything on Pakistan. It also looks that placing Pakistan in non ally camp is part of exit policy of US as it has served its purpose during the war and post war everything has to be blamed on Pakistan.
@Ejaaz: Perfectly agree with your analysis! If and when USA and NATO leave Afganistan, the chaos and war will spill over to pakistan.Terrorists and Jihadis dont turn a new leaf. They blackmail by guns and bombs.
Unfortunately these intermediate pass individuals who learn only how to most effectively blow-up and destroy things keep missing the point, for good or bad we are in this situation, historical perspective aside, what do we do from now on. Ally ourselves against America (and pretty much the entire western world) for these mindless terrorists we seem to feel are the cornerstone of our misguided strategic depth policy or get their help and get rid of them once and for all so everyone can rest easy. I don't even understand why we have our forces posted in FATA, we should just tell the Americans look we dont have the capacity, if you think you can do it be our guests....we will certainly loose fewer of our young brave men who still believe in patriotism and haven't yet become property grabbing star officers.
Your rating just fell by 50 points.
First Things First, Pakistan and Pakistanis should Pray HARD that OBAMA wins, if any republican wins, well well,
people of pakistan will have very very hard time.
Right on!
The Author after penning such good articles has decided to undo the credibility he had gained.
You ignore the previous policies of the Pak Govt which have infact supported the radical Islamist groups in Afghanistan during the 1990s, which is the whole cause of all this trouble. You either ignore it or fail to give it importance, I think the latter. But, it is important.
Pakistan did what it deemed necessary, US did what it deemed was congruent with its interests. If you are going to blame the US, at least acknowledge the contributions of Pakistan's policy in its instability?
@kaalchakra, same goes to you.
Dear Air Marshal, Your thinking seems to flawed in the sence that the group cannot return to Afghanistan in a meaningful way till 2024. Strategists fom the other side of Durrand Line would need to keep them gelled and under control till they a clear shot at Kabul, something that could prove difficult, if not, illusional.
The whitewash begins; the brainwash continues with forked tongue!
Pakistani generals, retired and functioning are too clever by half.
"Pakistan is the epitome of how an Army should wrest a country. It deserves a research by the discovery channel. It's a paragon for all the armies and generals in the world"
All the rantings have come down to this: "Pakistan will wait for the conditions to become conducive for the foreign elements to return to Afghanistan. Then it shall be for their own country to deal with them as it pleases"
In short PAK wants Haqqani, Omar and company to stage a run for Kabul with PAK aid.
Bad news is it is not going to happen; nothing is going to stop US to go after Haqqani , GLoC or not; instead there will be AFG -PAK proxy and AFG-PAK war and PAK will get sucked into her own grave. The cry of bomb won't help as PAK will be squeezed.
PAK is a softer target than AFG from the militant perspective.
I would suggest that the recent rhetoric concerning the Haqqani network has more to do with shaping the American public's opinion than trying to coerce Pakistan into action. The American's are changing their policy towards Pakistan and are moving you out of the "ally" category into something more appropriate --- what that is may still be up in the air but the recent rhetoric seems to be part of advising the American public that change is in the wind.
Alas, it isn't another nations war ... and you Sir are deeply mistaken if you expect the foreign elements to return ... or if you believe that would make a difference ... the leaders might be foreign but the army isnt ... as in the past with Afghan/Central Asian warlords, they have assembled an army in Pakistan and intend to stay here ...
Good Heavens! Is this just the Air Marshal talking, or the ISI? If this is the level of 'Two-Star' Pakistanis thinking I can only feel sorry for our country.
Its quite silly to think that Haqqani Network will simply leave Waziristan and move back to Afghanistan after US leaves. More likely is that Pakistan will accept that FATA is ruled by warlords and refocus itself on Kashmir issue.
We haven’t realized that what we considered tactical US engagement has taken a strategic dimension with US-Afghan strategic agreement that would allow US to maintain reduced presence until 2024. This means US won’t allow Taliban to take over Kabul and Northern Afghanistan. And Pakistan would be held liable for the civil war post 2014 withdrawal. So if we play it right, we could milk US for another 10 years, but that requires some fine skills, not crude ideas like the use of DPC mullahs as a tool of diplomacy
Lies, half-truths and more lies!
The Pakistani Army is not doing any favor by fighting in war against terror. They are being paid for it. Pakistan has been playing double game and now they will be paying the price. Good luck retd. air-vice marshall.
Air Marshal Saab ji: Everyone knows that it is not a matter of opening another front. It is a matter of defeating America. Haqqani will get us Afghanistan eventually. Unfortunately, the amreekis have figured our lying and no longer trust us. We may get afghanistan but we are not going to get amreeki dollars again. Maybe the goodies will now flow from china and russia but they have never been as free with their money as the amreekis. So when the blow back from our Taliban friends starts reaching our beautiful hills of Islamabad we may not have the amreeki funded budget to ward them off. We should all get used to growing fistful long beards and shalwars above the ankles right away. For that is coming our way for sure.