The recently concluded meeting of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) leaders in Beijing confirmed the desires of both China and Russia to reinforce their ties with Pakistan, not only in the bilateral sphere, but on the multilateral plain as well. Summit related events also revealed growing unease in both capitals with the foreign policy trajectory of the Obama Administration. Not only has Washington virtually abandoned the much hailed ‘re-set’ in its policy with Russia, but some of its recent decisions demonstrate the absence of an understanding of Russia’s concerns, as evident from the Chicago Nato summit’s declaration that its ballistic missile defence (BMD) had achieved “an interim capability”. This raised fresh questions as to its true purpose, as the recently completed Deterrence and Defense Posture Review stated that “the supreme guarantee of the security of the allies is provided by the strategic forces of the alliance”.
Beijing and Moscow are also convinced that while developments regarding Iran’s nuclear programme and Syria’s human rights record are worrying, US strategic objectives in both countries could have adverse implications for them. Consequently, the Vladimir Putin-Hu Jintao meeting made it clear that SCO countries were strongly in favour of “all parties refraining from remarks and actions that could lead to the escalation of confrontation” on Iran. Similarly, a Chinese foreign ministry spokesman confirmed that both countries “oppose external intervention in the Syrian situation and oppose regime change by force”.
More significantly, the Beijing summit was used by China and Russia to press the SCO’s claim to play a bigger role in Afghanistan, an impression confirmed by President Hu Jintao when he stated that the organisation favoured managing regional affairs within the family while “guarding against shocks from turbulence outside the region”. President Hamid Karzai took advantage of the summit to enhance his own options, confirming that the two countries were working on an agreement for the “creation of a strategic partnership”, while urging China to “play a very significant role in bringing Afghanistan and Pakistan together towards a cooperative environment in the war on terror and radicalism”. Clearly, China, which is already involved in a number of large projects, especially those in energy and copper, is set to move into the country in a far bigger way, including through the training of security forces.
Pakistan can find some comfort in the summit’s deliberations, as well as from recent visits to Islamabad by China’s foreign minister and by President Putin’s special envoy. While China used the occasion to reaffirm support and solidarity with Pakistan — pointedly asking the world to recognise its “huge sacrifices” in the war on terror — Russian envoy, Zamir Kabulov, came with an offer of economic help. The symbolism of these visits — especially at a time when Pakistan has been under tremendous pressure from the US and faces daily accusations by American leaders — was not lost on the region and far beyond. Pakistanis were not mistaken in seeing these gestures as reassuring, more so when viewed against the backdrop of American threats — many of which were made by senior officials while visiting India, revealing extreme insensitivity towards Pakistan’s concerns.
Symbolism can, however, take you only so far. Pakistan has to seize the new opportunities but not merely to fend off American pressure. It needs to recognise that genuine improvement of relations with Russia, along with further deepening of our ties with China would serve our interests well and also respond to the desire of many Pakistanis. But this will not be easy as relations with Moscow remain burdened by the legacy of a difficult past and misgivings about some aspects of our Afghan policy. Nevertheless, a genuine effort must be undertaken, for it would be in our interest as well as that of the region.
Published In The Express Tribune, June 13th, 2012.
Correction: In an earlier version of the story, Shanghai Cooperation Organisation was mistakenly written as Special Communications Organisation. The error has been rectified.
COMMENTS (42)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@Riaz Haq: "No alliance is permanent. Pakistan has been a US ally since its independence and yet US is seeking to use “India card” against it."
In Pakistan's zero sum world US may be using India "card". Most others would see these as two independent relationships governed by US national interests. It gives Pakistan free weapons which India resents. It gave India the nuclear deal which Pakistan resents...As you indicated as you mentioned, the tilt was much more pronounced in favour of Pakistan in the past but US has been systematically alienated by the safe havens provided to those militants who attack US soldiers while supposedly claiming to be a US ally on the global war on terror.
It is unclear how it would be in Russian national interest to back Pakistan against India. In recent times in fact they have grown closer since they have two more forums to co-ordinate and co-operate their economic strategies e.g. G20 and BRICS.
Anything that starts as "Pakistan must....." ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++=
Is not worth reading...it would'nt happen.
@gp65: "Do you think Russia would support Pakistan AGAINST India who has been an ally for 60 years? "
No alliance is permanent. Pakistan has been a US ally since its independence and yet US is seeking to use "India card" against it.
http://www.riazhaq.com/2010/01/impact-of-growing-india-us-military.html
A very interesting article.
USA is trying to build a permanent influence in central Asia. Getting bases in Afghanistan from Karzai government cannot camouflage the fact that its been defeated there.
USSR would love USA to bleed there the same way as it did. USA is bankrupt already and its only its military might which is keepin the $ afloat.
@Author
At what price this support...lets not kid ourselves Russia and China will demand something in return for all their support...just hope it is something we can deliver...cause these two countries are a lot less indulgent that the US when it comes to not getting their way...
It is very good analysis. Writer has correctly indentified Russia's interest in improving relations with Pakistan. Read this essay by Dr.Stephen Blank.
http://www.jamestown.org/single/?nocache=1&txttnews[tt_news]=39462
" It is disappointing but not surprising that our freinds from across the border love not only to trash any good suggestion coming from our highly capable and experienced retired diplomats, but also to engage in snide personall remarks."
Just one question: when are you going to start developing your own economy, industry, agriculture and infrastructure for your people and stop depending on outside nations (which simply put are using you?) When is Pakistan going to get rid of their ludicrous foreign policy and concentrate on development for its own people.
good article. only for those who know some thing about international politics PLUS history dating some rough 100 years or so.
@Vikas: Hahahahahahahahahahahah!
@Babloo: "How much more deeper and higher can the friendship which is “higher than Himalayas and deeper than Indian Ocean” get ?"
On second thoughts, if the relationship keep on going deeper and deeper, they both will emerge in other side of the earth. But wait, there is America on the other end of the hemisphere. May be they have to detour towards Africa when go enough deep!!!.Shallow Analysis. Now my question is, What if the Russian President asks pakistan to take a stance on Chechen Rebles fighting in the Caucuses. You either support them or oppose them, point blank. One cant oppose both the camps. Same with Thailand in their fight agianst rebels in the southern provience and Philipines against Abu Saef Rebels. And also Turkey, Syria and Iran against kurdist Rebels. Take a pick Rgds P
I was also wondering why the author has mentioned SCO as Special communications Organisation instead of Shanghai Cooperation Organisation. SCO's main players are China & Russia. While China is keen to give permanent membership to Pakistan it opposes India's membership. While Russia's position is it is willing to concede the demand of China for Pakistan's permanant membership provided India is also accomodated. That is why the issue is still not resolved. But the fact of the matter is both of these countries cannot take the bull (USA) by the horn because they have their own interest to safe guard with US when it comes to reality. In short all these publicity about taking more active role in Afganistan will remain only as propaganda nothing will change in the ground since USA will maintain minimum forces & bases in Afghanistan even after 2014. So the best option available to Pakistan is to sort out the issues of NATO supply & to act as a responsible nation with zero tolerance towards terrorism whether it is from Haqqani or TTP
Its scary to think that these ill informed individuals are making the foreign policy of this unfortunate country! God help Pakistan & Pakistanis. If you have FRIENDS like these you do not need ENEMIES.
@Hina "we need to look at other options"
It is like a beggar speculating about his place of duty where in he has many options to beg anywhere in the downtown, The best option is not to beg at all. It is USA which spoiled Pakistan with its pocket money. By now this has almost become an habit for Pakistan to look for pocket money from anywhere in the world. Does not matter whether it is Peru or Paraguay. I think it should learn from Bangladesh how to stand on its own feat and how to hold its head high and how not to look for options. It is ironic that for many Pakistani businessmen Bangladesh has become an option to survive!
I am surprised to see that almost 99% of the comments are highly biased anti-Pakistan. one can easily understand after reading these comments that they are from across the border. ET should balance out the comments between favour and against.
China and Russia are not Islamic, so why this infatuation with these two countries? One among these is a perfect stranger and almost bankrupt, infact saved by massive Indian arms purchases. Their record too against their own Muslim minority is not that clean. Pakistan going to these infidel countries for saving citadel of Islam is ridiculous. It reflects badly on Pakistan's own reputation among rich Islamic countries, and shows it as some kind of an outcast.
The author is clueless about emerging equation in the region. Whatever that new emerging equation may be, but the so called Sino Pak relationship is well over and now a history. It is only the Pakistanis who are parroting the age old "deeper than..and higher than...." Sino Pak relationship slogan out of habit. Be China or Russia, it pays to ignore a cornered Pakistan, as it would do more to favor these countries on its own. Here is what happened on the eve of SCO summit. Chinese vice premier Li Keqiang told foreign minister SM Krishna that Sino-Indian ties would be the most important bilateral relationship in the 21st Century. Li's remark to Krishna, on the sidelines of the SCO summit in Beijing, is significant not just because he is slated to take over as China's premier from Wen Jiabao after the transition process starting July this year is over. But also since it virtually echoed US President Barack Obama's statement earlier to Indian Parliament terming the ties between the two democracies as the "defining partnership of 21st century". Time Of India.
The mistake regarding the full name of SCO must be the work of the paper; I have seen this kind of mistake being made by newspapers often. The Ambassador has been too long in this business not to know this. The recomendations made in the article deserve to be viewed seriously and should not be dismissed merely because of pakistan's mistakes in the past. there is grwoing understanding in the country that we need to look at other options and the author has rightly pointed out to them.
"India card" is already in play against China and Pakistan.
India is being co-opted by the United States. There is a burgeoning US-India relationship in almost all spheres. Indian Prime Minister Mr. Manmohan Singh summed it up well when he said to former President Bush on his visit to the White House in 2008, "The people of India deeply love you."
Given how upset Pakistanis are with the US, it's unlikely that Pakistani leaders will yield to pressure from a US-India alliance....they will probably respond by moving closer to the Chinese & the Russians.
http://www.riazhaq.com/2009/05/godfathers-vito-corleone-metaphor-for.html
Hello....Are you listening? When will Pakistan learn to be independent? Always looking for someone shoulders and hand outs in its perennial war with India. Are you not tired of being beggars in all your existence as an "independent" country? Get rid of your addiction to foreigners. What a shame, it was the US before, now you want Russia to replace it. Grow up.
A drowning man will clutch at any straw and there is no harm in taking comfort from events at the SCO. However to expect Russia and China to play the role of financial benefactors is foolhardy.
@Vikas: Haha...right on Vikas Bhai.
@Vikas: I now very well ouput of ambassdors; In riyadh saudi arabia where pakistani community is more than 10million they have not able to create school buildings on the other hand Indians have many schools with huge buildings.Pakistanis cant get admissions in schools. I am sure a village school teacher can serve better if given chance.
very hurt to read such a shallow analysis from an ambassador! it looks like we pakistanis are hungry to get any recognition from whoever possible, it shows that we pakis have absolutely no moral, ethical, or constant view of ourselves or that of our partners. Rather like pure opportunists we change camp on the flip of hat. The tone of the article justifies that like beggars, we are looking here and there for any little help that others throw at us on our face. Russia and China could not care less for us, they are only looking at their own advantage as US pulls out.
Best thing Pakistan could do for its own sake 1. Suck it up it's false ego on kashmir and move on. This will probably lead to solve all issues with India. 2. Review education curriculum to stop brainwashing young generations from being "all non-Muslims r evil".
Point 1 is probably more easier but point 2 is quite impossible
From the 50s to the 80s US supported you against India. If you think Russia will replace that you are mistaken. Russia and India had deep ties in the past and they continue to have that.
It's hard to believe the author was formally a diplomat - his articles lack substance and seem to grasp at straws rather than the objectivity which a true diplomat should have.
Always the other side is greener is the thought process in PAK.
PAK has been seizing to someone else whether as an opportunistic partner or foe. She has to learn that she has nothing in common with the world and nothing to offer either, and people will come to her if she shows her own independent thinking and achievement
Now, what can PAK offer to the world today ? Why should others let her seize their coat tail, knowing well her past?
Truthful answers to these two questions will shape the future of PAK.
haha!! - is the Bear coming back to Afghanistan?! Or is it the turn of the Dragon this time!! We really do live in interesting times!!
China and Russia always side with the US on all major issues though they may vote against the US in the Security Council on minor issues like Syria. If the US or Israel attack Iran's nuclear facilities tonight, these two "Great powers" will only watch from the sidelines.
Plus, remember sir that China and the US have a bilateral trade of around $500 Billion. Plus total EU-China is around $550 Billion. That, sir, is why China will always prefer the US over Pakistan. Frankly, we are not that important.
Both Russia and China accuse you of terrorist links!! Without understanding why the world is pointing fingers at you...if you keep changing allies (good luck!) you shall meet the same fate. The fact is Russia does not that kind of patience which Americans have shown to you nor do they throw money like americans. Please write something more practical.
How much more deeper and higher can the friendship which is "higher than Himalayas and deeper than Indian Ocean" get ?
Sir, its the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO).
a new block is must to save the region from US monster
The author is painting a very rosy picture. He has conveniently refrained from mentioning that the Chinese also asked us to do more regarding harbouring of terrorists in FATA during their Foreign Minister’s visit. They both support US presence in Afghanistan and have voiced concern about US withdrawal.
Another important point of note is that while we have shown extreme concern regarding the killing of 24 Pakistani soldiers and not willing to move on with the Americans, we strongly believe that the Russians have forgotten that we aided in killing of thousands of Russian troops in the Afghan war.
"The recently concluded meeting of the Special Communications Organisation (SCO) leaders in Beijing ..." It is Shanghai Cooperation Organization not "Special Communication Organization"! Do moderators busy themselves with just weeding out comments?
Moscow will never forget the death of 30000 troops of Red Army in Afghanistan no matter what you do. Secondly whatever support Islamabad is getting from Moscow is against Washington. Moscow will never support in any matter against New Delhi. If
Dear Ambassador, SCO stands for Shangai Co-operation Organization and not Special Communication Organization as mentioned by you. No doubt why Pakistan's diplomacy is so poor.