Signing of a new visa regime between Pakistan and India was put on hold on Friday after Islamabad suggested that the agreement should be signed at the political level.
The accord was supposed to be inked at the end of two-day talks between the interior secretaries of the two neighbours on Friday.
However, Interior Minister Rehman Malik told journalists after meeting the Indian delegation, led by Home Secretary RK Singh, that the agreement on a relaxed visa policy was an historic development and should be signed at the “political level.”
Diplomatic sources said the Indian side came to Islamabad with expectations that the deal would be penned at the conclusion of talks. “Till last night, both sides were planning to sign the agreement on Friday,” said a source familiar with the development.
But, according to Indian media reports, Islamabad and I invite Indian Interior Minister Chidambaram to visit Pakistan to sign the document,” he added.
In New Delhi, India’s foreign secretary confirmed that the signing of the deal has been put off.
“We were ready to sign the agreement but some delay in the procedure led to a postponement,” Ranjan Mathai said on Friday.
Mathai said India had gone to the home secretary-level talks “fully prepared” to sign the new visa regime in accordance with the decision taken during April’s meeting between President Zardari and Prime Minister Manmohan Singh.
“But we also have reports that the Pakistani side referred to some delay in its procedure and the Pakistani interior minister’s desire for political participation” in signing of the pact, he said.
A joint statement issued after the talks attributed the delay to ‘some internal approvals’ required by Pakistan before the agreement is signed formally.
But it did confirm that the agreement had been finalised and would be signed at an early date.
Evidence against Hafiz Saeed
The issue of Mumbai investigations was also discussed during the talks with the Indian side asking Pakistan to do more to bring the perpetrators to justice.
However, Islamabad apparently refused to take action against Jammatud Dawa chief Hafiz Saeed for lack of evidence linking him with the attacks.
“We will look into the additional information provided by the Indians. But let me make it clear that we cannot take action merely on hearsay,” Malik insisted.
Nevertheless, according to the joint statement, the Pakistani side provided an update on the ongoing trial and investigations on the Mumbai terror attacks.
“The Pakistan side reiterated its commitment to bringing all the perpetrators of the Mumbai terror attacks to justice expeditiously in accordance with due process of law,” it said.
The two countries agreed to enhance cooperation between the National Investigation Agency of India and the Federal Investigation Agency of Pakistan on issues of mutual concern, including Mumbai terror attacks investigation.
On its part, India provided information on the ongoing Samjhauta Express blast investigation.
Release of fishermen, prisoners
Both sides welcomed the release of prisoners and fishermen, including those suffering from ailments, since the last round of home/interior secretaries’ talks.
It was agreed that those fishermen who have completed their sentences will be released by both sides within three months along with their boats, except where the boats have been lost, damaged or confiscated by the courts.
It was decided that prisoners, whose nationality status could not be confirmed either due to lack of information or due to the physical disabilities of the prisoner concerned, would be transferred to charitable institutions in India and Pakistan pending confirmation of their nationality status.
(Read: Visa matters)
Published in The Express Tribune, May 26th, 2012.
COMMENTS (24)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@Arijit Sharma
You lay claim to Pakistan as your homeland and many Pakistanis have their ancestral roots to India! So we also have a claim. I would personally love to visit India particularly Rajisthan, punjab, UP, etc...but being a Pakistani I always fear that it may be risky going to India. I have heard of several stories where Pakistani tourists have been labled as ISI agents by locals or indian muslim relatives who want to settle a personal score and the tourists have ended up in years of jail.
Finally, I will be able to visit my wife's birth place :)
i would love to visit Pakistan to try the food there. Pakistani cuisine seems to be awesome.
@Udaya Bose:
"May I say that that is a mistaken notion. Many Indians, Hindus if you are more comfortable calling them that, would be interested to visit Pakistan as tourists. To see Lahore, Peshawar, Mohenjo Daro Harappa, Taxila, Karachi and various other places. We don’t expect Hindu Indians to be harassed in Pakistan. All reports indicate Pakistanis are very hospitable. When we visit Pakistan, we would be there as Indians and not as Hindus."
Very positive attitude. You are most welcome. I wish other Indians also learn something from you.
@Allah Ditta: All most every Pakistani even jihadis want to visit India but I doubt that every Indian Hindu wants to do that… May I say that that is a mistaken notion. Many Indians, Hindus if you are more comfortable calling them that, would be interested to visit Pakistan as tourists. To see Lahore, Peshawar, Mohenjo Daro Harappa, Taxila, Karachi and various other places. We don't expect Hindu Indians to be harassed in Pakistan. All reports indicate Pakistanis are very hospitable. When we visit Pakistan, we would be there as Indians and not as Hindus.
@Polpot: "Indian Media has this story: the last minute change of heart is nothing but a tactic to extract concessions from india on Siachen"
The Indian defense minister A K Antony gave a clear unambiguous statement after Kayani stated that India has hardened its tsance on Siachen and another story in Express Tribune, Pakistan stated that India would be withdrawing its soldiers from current locations unilaterally. Antony said that India has neither hardened its stand nor softened it. The Indian position since 1999 when Kargill occurred is authentication of AGPL and delineation of border are pre-requisites to Siachen.
If Pakistan chooses to hold other confidence building measures hostage to Siachen thinking it can blackmail India - it is greatly mistaken.
@Allah Ditta: "MFN status was given to India and that proved nothing but an exit strategy for Pakistani elites. Newspapers write stories where Pakistanis want to open chains of shops in India and want residency permits"
MFN status is an obligation for Pakistan that it has failed to fulfill under WTO. If India chooses to take Pakistan to WTO, Pakistan could be compelled to grant this to India. So this is not a favour.
Also residency status is not linked in any way with MFN status , so it is unclear what basis you are making that connection.Please educate yourself on what MFN status means so that your comments can be better informed.
@Ramski: "Politicions trying to take credit which is not due to them. Shame on you."
What do you mean? Chidambaram did not want credit and stop it? If Rehman Malik from Pakistan wanted credit, he could have taken it by being the one to sign. This is not an issue of politicians trying to take credit. It is an issue of Pakistani politicians having big egos and being unwilling to deal with Indian civil service leadership even if it has been fully empowered with decision making powers by Indian government.
Lack of trust is the main cause between India and Pakistan .we expect good relations between these two. Our tries so that we can focus on poverty alleviation.we have more common things with India than any other country in th world, so let us build confidence from our side and sign the visa agreement, this is in favour of both countries people.
We are super rich, just for a petty signing of an already agreed upon regime, another meeting will be held. Indians wanted to sign it quick as they care more about their taxpayer's money.
India's message should be , if you want to sign the treaty now, come to India. Any one of you can come but on the Indian side it will be Indian home secretary who will sign it. India should not encourage this petty games.
Lahore bus yatra kargil
Indian foreign policy somehow demonstrates, how they are being driven by Global politics!!!
Again a big laugh Ha ha Ha!
A good time for India to suspend these talks.
Indian Media has this story: the last minute change of heart is nothing but a tactic to extract concessions from india on Siachen. ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Agreement on Siachen or nothing...thats Paks stand.
Why do you want to politically glorify and slow down everything?
MFN status was given to India and that proved nothing but an exit strategy for Pakistani elites. Newspapers write stories where Pakistanis want to open chains of shops in India and want residency permits. Visa regime is going to change anything. Most of visas will be issued to India Muslim and Sikhs. It is very unlikely that Indian Hindus will seek visa. One Daniel Pearl like incident to an Indian Hindu will stop all visas. Indian Muslim and Sikhs who will take advantage of relexed visa regime are in minority and will change nothing. Unless Pakistan take steps to woo Indian Hindus and make them comfortable visiting Pakistan, these two nations will never come close and be friendly. All most every Pakistani even jihadis want to visit India but I doubt that every Indian Hindu wants to do that...
A very disheartening development for the thousands of divided families yearning to meet their near and dear ones. Rahman Malik remains the bottleneck and exhibits poor competencies!!!
India comes confidently here to sign the treaty and they have 10 time more political parties there. We on the other hand, looked so cheap that we wanted to gain political mileage out of this. Indians must be laughing at us. Sch weak is our condition.
Politicions trying to take credit which is not due to them. Shame on you.
Sounds so familiar.
If Rehman Malik required Chidambaram to be present to sign, he should have made that expectation clear upfront. Why did he waste this team's time when all along he had no intention of signing?