Tripartite commission: Crucial security talks kick off today

Published: May 13, 2012
Gen Allen discusses agenda with Gen Kayani ahead of the meeting. PHOTO: REUTERS/ FILE

Gen Allen discusses agenda with Gen Kayani ahead of the meeting. PHOTO: REUTERS/ FILE


Top military commanders from Pakistan, Afghanistan and the International Security Assistance Force (Isaf) will be joining their heads today (Sunday) to work on a foolproof mechanism to enhance coordination at the Durand Line in order to avoid a repeat of the deadly Salala strikes.

It will be the first meeting of the Tripartite Commission since the November 2011 Nato air raid on Pakistani border posts in Mohmand Agency in which two dozen troops were killed.

The huddle in Rawalpindi will be attended by Army chief Gen Ashfaq Parvez Kayani, Afghan military chief Gen Sher Muhammad Karimi and Nato/Isaf commander Gen John Allen.

Gen Kayani and Gen Allen met in Rawalpindi on Saturday to set the meeting’s agenda. “Talks focused on operations in border areas and coordination mechanisms to avoid untoward incident,” said a statement issued by the Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR).

However, officials told The Express Tribune that the possibility of reopening Nato supply routes also came under discussion. The vital supply routes for thousands of foreign troops stationed in Afghanistan were plugged following the deadly Nato air strike.

Sunday’s meeting is taking place two days after Nato Secretary General Andres Fogh Rasmussen hinted that Pakistan could miss out on the key Chicago summit later this month, if it did not reopen the Nato supply lines.

However, Islamabad has sought to play down the statement – hinting that an invitation for the Chicago summit might come in the next few days. Last month, parliament had spelt out tough conditions for the government to allow Nato forces to transit their supplies through Pakistan.

The scheduled meeting of the tripartite commission gives an indication that tensions between Pakistan and the US are easing and there seems to be a tacit understanding between both countries to resume supplies. An announcement, to this effect, is likely ahead of the Chicago summit scheduled to be held on May 21-22. The issue would top the agenda when the Defence Committee of the Cabinet, meets next month.

Published in The Express Tribune, May 13th, 2012.

Facebook Conversations

Reader Comments (4)

  • syed baqar ahsan
    May 13, 2012 - 10:29AM

    Now is the time to show patience, do not scam to threat,might is right,arrogance and kick&carrot attitude,also fever by budget makers(the most easiest thing to make by raising basic commodity price).”””Do not annoy the Chinese,Russian and Iranians by participation in NATO system””””.Its time to show sincerity and commitment to neighbours.Americans are here to bully each one of us.


  • syed baqar ahsan
    May 13, 2012 - 10:35AM

    Must keep in mind NATO is also fed up being used by American objective only,sir Kayani.


  • May 13, 2012 - 11:01AM

    The APOLOGY is the bone of contention. With sophisticated state-of-the-art technology, it does not make sense how could the NATO forces attack Salala, Additionally, the NATO has been operating for ten plus years and yet they run afoul of the agreed terms.

    This was a deliberate attack and is presently full of excuses. The Americans want to blackmail us for their loss in Afghanistan. They have not been able to go all out to defeat the Taliban, hence putting the blame on us.

    No supply routes to be opened until the GOP does not learn to rely on self-help for the economy. NO aid, loans, grants, handouts, gifts, or presents. PERIOD.

    Salams to Pakistan


  • Muhammad Ahsan Khan
    May 13, 2012 - 8:33PM

    “untoward incident,” is not created only by Nato Forces, Pak Army or Afghan Army; but also by Afghan Taliban, Pakistani Taliban, some Al-Quaida Jihadis as well as the Jihadi Groups controlled by ISI.

    So. the “Tripartite Commission “ will not succeed to prevent the so called “untoward incident” unless the other parties collaborate.

    Why not an All Parties commission?


More in Pakistan