What’s in a name?
The entire situation is a ludicrous one. Human rights activists have pointed out that NADRA cannot determine the religion of a person; what the person says should be the final word on the matter. To add to the problem, NADRA now says the record listing Mahmood’s religion as ‘Islam’ cannot be changed. Any other religion can be altered but Islam. It seems impossible to believe that a clerical error cannot be rectified and that Mahmood is ‘stuck’ with a faith he says is not his.
A name is, of course, no basis to decide an individual’s religion. There are many names shared by Muslims, Christians and those of other faiths everywhere in the world. Granting Mahmood the status he seeks as a Christian should not be made into an issue. The evidence we have so far indicates a simple error was made, with no malice involved. Surely, it is possible to rectify this and as the activists have suggested, allow the MPA to declare for himself what his religion is. This is a basic right which no citizen should be denied by any other individual or authority.
Published in The Express Tribune, April 24th, 2012.
COMMENTS (4)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
1734511806-0/Untitled-design-(5)1734511806-0-270x192.webp "saim ayub breaks brian lara s odi record")
1734587529-0/Express-Tribune-(1)1734587529-0-270x192.webp "pakistan to host another icc event")
1734468458-0/Copy-of-Untitled-(50)1734468458-0-270x192.webp "salman agha shares man of the match award with saim ayub in touching gesture")
A most effective means of mass civil protest is to gum up the works. Just imagine what would happen if merely ten thousand ordinary everyday Pakistanis decided to file with NADRA to change their religion from "Christian" or "Muslim" to "Spy". Just think of how daunting the task of investigation would be for the "agencies"!
Religion is a private matter and NADRA should not record it - unless it helps Pakistan become prosperous.
Indonesia has the largest number of Muslims in the world. For the first 50 years after independence it was ruled by Sukarno, Suharto and Megawati. Please note that all these 3 names are in fact Sanskrit based names. IT does not make those people Hindu. In India it is a practice among syrian catholics to have oneAnglicized name and one Sanskrit based name. Again , no-one questions their Christianity. Agree with the author that it was ab initio wrong of NADRA to assign Islam as a religion simply based on his name. But an error can happen. It is einexplicable that NADRA feels the error cannot be corrected. SO here too I agree with the author. But I have a further question. What if a Muslim chooses to convert to Christianity or Hinduism or becomes an atheist. DO they not have te right to do so.I thouht there was no compulsion in religion as per Quran?
What if someone is an ex-Muslim and is now an atheist or agnostic? Why can't he/she have the records changed. Why has the government decided that no Muslim will be allowed to change his/her religion officially? Why must atheists be forcefully kept Muslims by the Government in the records?
I thought there was supposed to be no compulsion in religion, than what is this severely oppressive policy of the state?