US willing to discuss issues, demands raised by Pakistan after ties review completed

Mark Toner says US would discuss the issues raised by Pakistan in its review of ties, solve via a middle ground.


Huma Imtiaz April 13, 2012

WASHINGTON: With Pakistan finally completing its review of foreign policy, for its part, the US has indicated its willingness to discuss and find a middle ground to address issues raised by the Parliament.

Addressing reporters at the daily press briefing, State Department spokesperson Mark Toner said that the US wants to discuss the breadth of issues raised in Pakistan's parliamentary review.

While declining to address the issue of drone strikes, Toner maintained that the US would discuss civilian and counterterrorism cooperation with the Government of Pakistan.

Shahrukh Khan was delayed, not detained

On the subject of Bollywood actor Shahrukh Khan being delayed at a New York airport, Toner said that he was delayed while getting off of the plane, but had not been detained, and that the State Department had apologised.

He said that the Indian Embassy had reached out to them on the matter. Toner said that they respected Shahrukh Khan's work as an actor and as a humanitarian.

COMMENTS (9)

Ahmer Ali | 12 years ago | Reply

"While declining to address the issue of drone strikes, Toner maintained that the US would discuss civilian and counterterrorism cooperation with the Government of Pakistan" US leaders your this statement shows and proves that you are not ready/willing now and in the future to stop drones' attacks on Pakistan.If this is so then why do you claim and say falsely and untruly in your statements before the world thru media that we respect Pakistan's sovereignty????

MarkH | 12 years ago | Reply

@Thoughtful: You're not the only one. Though I'd find setting up camp on the grassy knoll more appropriate. Maybe I'll go with disowning. Less jail time.

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ