Lawmakers make mockery of mandatory declarations

Give vague answers regarding accumulation of wealth.


Irfan Ghauri March 21, 2012
Lawmakers make mockery of mandatory declarations

ISLAMABAD:


Lax laws governing the declaration of assets by legislators have evidently turned the practice into a jest. While some senators did declare realistic values of their assets, others showed either complete incomprehension or alarming apathy by jotting down nonsensical answers such as “limitless” or “not applicable” in the annual declaration of assets’ forms for the fiscal year 2010-2011, released by the Election Commission.


Taking advantage of the absence of any mechanism to scrutinise these declarations, senators, who decided to disclose any at all, grossly undervalued their assets.

Pervez Rashid

Perhaps the most puzzling response comes from PML-N’s chief spokesperson Pervez Rasheed who crossed out all columns and wrote “non-applicable,” without stating any reasons.

In one column at the end of the form, Rasheed mentions that he has Rs124,000 cash, without specifying if it is in-hand or in a bank account.

Senator with ‘unlimited’ wealth

A senator from Fata, Rashid Ahmed Khan declared his fixed assets’ worth to be “unlimited.” He mentions owning coal and soap stone mines and agricultural land, but listed their cost and present value as having no limit. Under the remarks column, he writes: “it has no limit.”

He also mentions transferring current assets worth Rs500,000; to whom or the nature of the assets was not specified.

Rehman Malik

The federal interior minister wrote “no change since last declaration” in the three pages of the form provided by the commission. The form has columns to list the actual cost of assets, their present market value, and another column seeking an explanation for the appreciation or depreciation of the same.

Nayyer Bukhari

Senate Chairman Nayyer Bukhari scribbled under the value of his immovable property “as previous declared in 2010 (sic).”

According to the details he provided of his immovable assets, Bukhari owns a 1990 Chevrolet Caprice worth 0.5 million, 35 tolas of jewellery, Rs1.4 million in two cash accounts and articles of personal use worth around Rs0.25 million.

Chaudhry Shujaat

PML-Q’s president Chaudhry Shujaat Hussain declared the value of his 50% share in two residential properties located in posh neighbourhoods of Islamabad and Lahore to be worth just Rs5.2 and Rs3.4 million, respectively. He did not mention their current value.

The value of his agricultural holdings is also quite prudently stated. One stretch of 78 acres of agricultural land is worth just Rs3.76 million while another 12.5 acres of land is worth Rs4.5 million. Both properties are worth exactly what they were at the time of purchase, according to him.

He holds shares in stock markets worth Rs10.4 million and has Rs53.9 million cash-in-hand. However, he does not own a car, suggests his financial declaration.

Exceptions

While most lawmakers made a mockery of the exercise, some senators did provide reasonable details of their wealth.

Senator Tariq Azam, who retired this month after completing his six-year tenure, has mentioned the cost and present value of his assets both in Pakistan and abroad.

Similarly, PPP’s Abdul Hafiz Sheikh and Babar Awan, PML-N’s Ishaq Dar, MQM’s former senator Ahmed Ali are among those who have provided adequate details of assets owned by them and their dependents.

Most indebted

Senator Gulzar Ahmad Khan and his two sons Waqar Ahmad Khan and Ammar Ahmad Khan top the list of indebted lawmakers. Their collective debt amounts to Rs3.13 billion.

Published in The Express Tribune, March 21st, 2012.

COMMENTS (8)

p r sharma | 12 years ago | Reply

Mandatory Declaration should have a clause possessing the assets in the names of wife/ close relatives. To fight against corruption media and social activists/general public should exert pressure to make legislation that any undisclosed asset/income (per income Tax return) be confiscated immediately . there should also be a provision to award 5% of asset value to the person/group/NGO who provide evidence of such undisclosed assets. Also such person should be debarred from election as well as holding any govt.post. In present day democracy public elect their representatives( law makers) but they may be asked to have opinion of the people whom they represent on important legislation to curb corruption. This is most important . Simply blaming the politicians and leaving them uncontrolled will not serve the purpose. It may take time but surely honest persons shall emerge in public life to be true representatives of people of Pakistan.

FJ | 12 years ago | Reply

May be typo error. They forgot to add "0s". Human error :)

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ