Benazir Income Support Programme: Does the cash flow to blue-eyed voters?

Published: February 4, 2012
Lawmakers accuse the government of using BISP as a political tool: The Express Tribune looks at the data, and weighs the arguments.

Lawmakers accuse the government of using BISP as a political tool: The Express Tribune looks at the data, and weighs the arguments.


The numbers don’t make sense at first glance.

Punjab, with more than twice the population of Sindh, has two-thirds of the number of families considered eligible for income support in the latter.

Multan, the prime minister’s hometown, has almost half the population of Lahore, stronghold of the opposition Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N), yet has twice as many families receiving Rs1,000 monthly stipend from the government.

The apparent anomalies have led to resentment, and accusations of nepotism, not just from the opposition, but government’s allies too.

Lawmakers say that districts and constituencies considered strong-hold of the ruling Pakistan Peoples Party have a disproportionately high number of people considered eligible for cash handouts.

The opposition openly accuses the government of using the Benazir Income Support Programme (BISP) as a political tool since its inception in 2008.

Many lawmakers are also questioning the authenticity of a Rs5 billion poverty survey conducted by the BISP last year. The results of the country’s ‘first ever’ poverty survey have yet to be made public.

Provincial data

When the BISP official data, available with The Express Tribune, is plotted on a provincial map, the findings lend credence to opposition’s claims at first glance.

Punjab, the most populous province but ruled by the opposition PML-N, has the lowest ratio of beneficiary families – 1,974 families per 100,000 people – of the four federating units. Sindh, the stronghold of PPP, has three-and-a-half times that ratio – 6,829 families per 100,000 people.

Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa and Balochistan, where PPP is part of coalition governments with its allies – the Awami National Party (ANP) and the Pakistan Muslim League-Quaid (PML-Q) – trail Sindh with 5,155 and 4,858 beneficiary families per 100,000 people respectively.

Both Gilgit-Baltistan, an autonomous territory, and Azad Jammu and Kashmir, a self-governing state, have governments aligned with the ruling PPP and have 2,400 and 1,518 beneficiary families per 100,000 people receiving income support respectively.

Constituency-level data

A closer inspection at some of the districts further corroborates the opposition’s suspicions. Districts where the ruling party or its allies have majority of the constituencies (coloured blue in the corresponding map), fare better than where the opposition holds sway (coloured red).

District-wise ratios of beneficiary families to per 100,000 people are also given.


When asked about apparent disparity in the data, a BISP spokesperson said that given the socio-economic variance across the country, the number of BISP beneficiaries is not proportionate to the population of any district.

“Poverty scorecard is a scientific instrument and it identifies eligible families based on their poverty score, rather than any other consideration” said the spokesperson in a written reply.

The programme declares those eligible for Rs1,000 monthly income support who score less than 17, out of a total 100 points, in the Poverty Targeting Survey Programme (PTSP).

Poverty varies in different cities according to distribution of resources – hence the poverty level in Thar cannot be compared with that of Lahore, Rajanpur cannot be compared with Rawalpindi and Benazirabad cannot be compared with Karachi, he added.

A cross-check with district-wise Human Development Index (HDI) scores, a standard means of measuring well-being globally, lends at least some credence to the spokesperson’s claim. Punjab has a higher HDI compared to other provinces while Karachi and Lahore, which has a low ratio of beneficiary families compared to Multan, have the highest HDIs amongst the districts compared. There are anomalies, though, like Khairpur and Larkana.

Contracts to survey firms

The BISP spent Rs5 billion on the poverty survey, the PTSP. Of this, Rs2.5 billion have been given to organisations conducting the survey and Rs1.75 billion to post offices. The programme owes Rs733 million to these organizations in lieu of the exercise.

The survey was largely conducted by the Rural Support Programme Network – in Upper Punjab, AJK, Sindh, K-P and G-B. Other independent firms were contracted for surveys in southern Punjab and Fata while the Population Census Organisation was awarded the contract for Balochistan survey. The government’s allies are raising questions over the survey.

“I questioned the procedure adopted by the BISP for awarding contracts for PTSP and details of amount paid to each organisation for survey but they never replied, which is a breach of lawmakers’ rights,” said  ANP Senator Zahid Khan.

Terming the survey “as controversial as the BISP,” Khan said that several senators will move against the BISP in the courts [for] rampant corruption and nepotism.

The programme awards all contracts using the World bank’s guidelines for ‘quality and cost based selection’ of these firms, said the BISP spokesperson.

It is a very rigorous process and the BISP secured World Bank’s approvals at every stage of the award of process, he added.

Published in The Express Tribune, February 4th, 2012.

Facebook Conversations

Reader Comments (6)

  • Feb 4, 2012 - 11:25AM

    Raising questions about the PPP Governance is a “Sinister Plot against DEMOCRACY”. :)


  • Topak Khan
    Feb 4, 2012 - 11:53AM

    If you don’t know jack about survey costs, how to calculate poverty, disparity across provinces and districts and then PLEASE do not write about BISP. I am not saying BISP targeting should not be analyzed. but this piece is just making an issue because it wants to make BISP an issue. instead of making it sound like another corrupt scheme of politician act you should advocate making the data public


  • Mirza
    Feb 4, 2012 - 1:46PM

    BISP is a great scheme to support poorest of the poor. It is not based upon population or democracy but on poverty. Southern Punjab and rural Sind are more poor than the urban elites hence they get a bigger share. Punjab in general and large cities in particular are much better off than the rural population of the country. Where should the charity go? Not to Islamabad, Lahore, Karachi but to the most poor areas. Stop the blame game of hater mongering please.


  • Shaheen
    Feb 5, 2012 - 8:27AM

    Food security in Sindh is 72%. Considering the recent floods and rainfall, the poverty in Sindh, NWFP & Punjab have increased tremendously. Any BISP payments should be plotted against the poverty clusters which are not in big cities or in Central Punjab or Islamabd. The poor analytical reporting of tribune reporter will damage the onjective journalism which Tribune espouses. Please no politics on poverty, poor people at least needs sustainance. Development disparity existing in Pakistan is worst form of discrimination against the underpriviliged people.


  • Ahsan Mlk
    Feb 6, 2012 - 9:37PM

    According to BISP’s own figures:

    Each family gets Rs.1000 per month. (to total 4million people only)
    Rs.100bn given out over 4 years out of which “administrative costs” = Rs.26bn.

    And even if all was fair and square, what good does a 1000Rs. do in these times of poverty?

    Its a bad idea right from the start. The 100 billion Rs. could’ve been used in better projects eg. electricity sector to benefit the whole 180 million people!

    Incompetent .Recommend

  • Muhammad adil
    Mar 8, 2012 - 11:31AM

    Plz tell me how can i check on the internet that my amount is added to my account from b.i.s.p or i m selected for this scheme?


More in Pakistan