Local fraudsters claiming to be historians will tell you this was the original Samarkand whence the inhabitants migrated to and settled in the better known city of the same name, in Uzbekistan, in or about the year 250 CE. Little do these charlatans know that Samarkand in Central Asia was where Alexander, in a drunken rage, killed his general Cleitos. This was the very man who had saved Alexander from an attacker in the thick of battle on the Granicus River in Turkey. But that is beside the point.
In 1994, my revered guru, Dr Saifur Rahman Dar led an archaeological mission to the Salt Range and concluded that the construction of what little remained of the fort, clearly dated to the early 13th century. Dr Dar was also given a coin by a local and the information that it was minted at ‘Darul Mulk Delhi’. The worn inscription was frustratingly limited to ‘Shah (illegible) Sultan’.
While the fort stood on the ridge, the coin was found from the flat area below, which was once the site of a residential area. Of the houses, however, nothing is now left. Both the remains of the fort and the coin give Samarkand a tentative date of the 13th century.
We must remember that in February 1221, Jalaluddin Khwarazm on the run from the Mongols passed through this area. Here, he befriended the local chieftain Rai Sangin of the Khokhars. With the Mongols breathing down on the man, I imagine he would have asked his host if there was a secret sanctuary to shelter from his tormentors. Rai Sangin may have taken him to the fortress hidden away behind the ridges.
Later that year, when Jalaluddin returned from his raid on Multan and Uch with some of the treasure of Nasiruddin Qabacha, he may have paid Rai Sangin the necessary funds to enlarge and strengthen the fort. Then, as the monsoon rolled around, the hills breaking out in a profusion of verdure may have reminded the Central Asiatic fugitive of his lost country.
Could it be that in a paroxysm of nostalgia, Jalaluddin sighed ‘Oh, Samarkand!’ and the name stuck to the newly enlarged fort? Conversely, it is also likely that seeing the greenery suddenly break out across the otherwise spare hills in the August showers, the man may have requested his host to call it Samarkand after the famous city.
Howsoever it may have got the title, the fort and the little built-up area below it did not remain long in use. The reason being the scarcity of water. As well as that, situated in the midst of mountainous country, impossible for wheeled traffic to negotiate, the fortress could only have served as a safe haven for fugitives like Jalaluddin. It was never destined to be a great and famous city, no matter what local sham historians may tell unsuspecting visitors.
Postscript: Just outside Maira Emma there is a well that delivers up sweet drinking water to this day and is the only source of water for the village. Among the limestone blocks that made up the well, there was one with a Kharoshti inscription. It gave the names which — since there were no royal titles — were believed to be of ordinary persons. Because it also mentioned the word sramanera — Buddhist lay brother — the stone revealed the religion of the person who ordered it. The year ‘Sam [Samvat] 58’ on the stone corresponded with the first year of the Common Era.
The stone was removed to the Lahore Museum and the first decipherment of the inscription was done in the 1850s. Thereafter, it was misplaced. It is now impossible to know if the stone was especially cut to be used in the well or if it was appropriated from the ruins of another earlier building.
Published in The Express Tribune, February 4th, 2012.
COMMENTS (15)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@Ali Tanoli The fact is Mughals had no place to go back while the British had. And anyday I will prefer a British over a south ashian when it comes to appreciating and preserving matters of historical significance.
@Ali Tanoli:
Mughals were also on run from their native country which at that time was under their powerful enemy, so they didn't return back
@Abod p. khan Is not it kuey yaar was Delhi Hind?? not central asia where today peoples dont even know that Mughals left and rules india... and my questian was Mughals came for what ever reason is but they did not went back and never steal and build central asia unlike socalled colonist or slavery came to india and looted it distroys dehlis our language made big holes in the relation of Hindu/Muslims....
@Ali Tanoli: Baghdad tresures in America and indian tresure in Britain but mughal never took to samarkand or Bokhara or Turkmanistan??? why is that Mr Khan??
I have replied to this query but for whatever reasons, it has not been published by ET yet. A concise explanation of your query is that, the Moghals and Ottomans left their old habitat for a multitude of reasons to find a new home in Sar Zamin e Hind or Turkiye for settling there. Samarkand, Bokhara or Ferghna remained as part of nostalgic faint memory. And their last wish remained to get a spot of land for burial in the ku'ey yaar.
The Europeans established colonies as sources for acquiring raw material and other goods, spices, cotton etc. Carpetbaggers had a heyday during that period. Some of their loot ended up as trophies, decorating the museums.
Indians are very happy to coments on lala salman jis articles i dont know why they have sumbunth.
@ Salman Rashid Sahib,
I deeply appreciate your contribution in reminding us Pakistanis of our rich heritage and history through your travel writings. Since you have mentioned Jalaluddin, will it be possible for you to locate the site of battle between Ghengiz Khan and Jalaluddin on the western bank of Indus River, upstream of Kalabagh? As I read long time back the place was known as Dhingot or Dinkot, a small village. I has seen the place marked as battlefield on the old military maps printed in British times. It is no more there on the current maps. It will be inresting for many people to know what the Tartar said seeing Jalaluddin jumping with horse in to the River from cosiderable hight that "such sons fathers should have" or similar words. A Monumemnt on the battle site with a short asccount could be great attraction for some people. In fact such monuments on battle sites which are in large number like of that of Alexanders battles and others could be a profitable buisness concern for our Toure Operators.
Salman Rashid Sahib .. please write about lineage and history of Khokhars.
@Abid P khan Baghdad tresures in America and indian tresure in Britain but mughal never took to samarkand or Bokhara or Turkmanistan??? why is that Mr Khan??
@Pakistani Muslim: And Takht e Taus was transported to Persia for safekeeping by Nader Shah. Outside the Blue Mosque, Istanbul one sees Egyptian obelisks. Inside Topkapi Museum, Istanbul, you see relics which were once in Kaaba. Tipu Sultan's "Cown" can be seen stashed in a glass cabinet in Hampton Court, England.
The list goes on.
Power resides in the barrel of a gun.
@ Abid P khan, you mean the stone is as safe as the Kohinoor is with the british ?
Thank you, sir.
I was unsuccessful trying to find pictures of the fort online. Please can someone post a link to the fort.
@Balma:
During the rule of BB, Puristan was the only country in the world which recognised the Taleban regime which had captured Kabul. Her henchman Naseerullah Baber (aka The Butcher from Khajji Ground), proudly represented the Taleban regime in negotiations with the Northern Alliance.
A bunch of journalists visiting Naseerullah at his house could not avoid noticing that half of the exhibits of Kabul Museum were stacked up in his living room! When asked, the reply was,"They are here only for safe keeping".
No need to take a cup of tea with Queen. The missing stone could very well be in safe care in a place nearer at home.
Stone went missing? Have you checked the British Museum or Albert and Victoria museum in London? :-)