Saudi Arabia cautious on hosting Afghan-Taliban talks

Saudi Arabia wants Taliban to renounce its ties to al Qaeda before talks can proceed.


Reuters January 31, 2012

RIYADH: Saudi Arabia has shown its reluctance to host talks between the Afghan government and the Taliban without concessions from the Islamic movement, including renouncing its ties to al Qaeda, sources in Riyadh and Kabul said on Tuesday.

An Afghan official said on Monday that talks would be held in the Islamic kingdom this year, but on Tuesday the Afghan ambassador to Riyadh, Saeed Ahmed Omarkhail, said no formal approach had yet been made to the Saudi authorities.

"The kingdom has a role and has been involved in these issues in the past. The Afghan president has asked Saudi Arabia to hold talks in the past but there is nothing new," Omarkhail said.

A Saudi source with strong government connections and a senior Afghan government source said Saudi Arabia was taking a cautious approach to the talks.

Al Qaeda has in the past carried out high profile bombings in Saudi Arabia and has vowed to overthrow the US-backed royal family.

Saudi Arabia's objections to the Taliban's links to al Qaeda were cited by US diplomats as the reason proposed talks failed to move forwards in early 2010, according to a US diplomatic cable released by WikiLeaks.

It said Saudi intelligence chief Prince Muqrin turned down a request from Afghan President Hamid Karzai to host talks because the Saudis "would not support such talks until the Taliban renounced al Qaeda".

"The major problem that Saudi has in mind is that the Taliban are heavily linked to al Qaeda, and secondly it's next to impossible for the Taliban to formally cut ties with al Qaeda," said an Afghan official.

Other potential sticking points include the Taliban's use of the title "Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan", which Saudi officials believe precludes the movement from recognising other legitimate power structures in the country, said the Saudi source.

Face-to-face

A senior Afghan government source said negotiations would not be possible without a Taliban ceasefire and face-to-face meetings between the two sides.

Ambassador Omarkhail in Riyadh said any move to hold talks in the Gulf Arab kingdom would not be possible until after the Taliban had established a representative office in Qatar.

"After that there will be agendas set for talks," he said.

The Taliban announced this month they would open a political office in the Qatari capital Doha to support possible peace talks with the United States.

The US special envoy to Afghanistan and Pakistan, Frank Ruggiero, visited Riyadh this month but Washington is expected to leave any new moves on talks in the kingdom to the Saudis.

Saudi Arabia has had some influence in Afghanistan since it supported mujahideens against Soviet occupation forces in the 1980s. It has maintained a close relationship with Pakistan and supports both countries with large aid donations.

"What matters to Saudi Arabia is Pakistan. Bringing peace to Afghanistan will help very much in bringing peace back to Pakistan," said Jamal Khashoggi, a Saudi commentator.

Saudi Arabia has taken a more assertive role in foreign policy in recent months after last year's Arab uprisings, which transformed its immediate neighbourhood and threatened to alter the power balance with regional rival Iran.

Riyadh orchestrated a Gulf Arab plan to ease a power transition in Yemen, and led Arab League efforts to isolate Syria over its crackdown on mass protests.

However, it has been frustrated before by the complex process of mediating between warring Afghan factions.

Two decades ago a Saudi prince took Afghan warlords inside the Kaaba in Mecca and had them solemnly swear to end the fighting that was destroying their country.

That peace was broken before the warlords left the building as a Saudi official who was present received a phone call from Kabul saying that one side had just started shelling the other.

COMMENTS (1)

You Said It | 12 years ago | Reply

This reminds me of the time that our good defence ministry announced that China would be building a naval base at Gwadar, and China responded by saying they had not heard of any such proposal. Pakistan and Afghanistan share this in common: our politicians and their lackey bureaucrats rush in to please Saudis and various other masters, and forget to check whether the other party is willing. I guess that explains our respective status wrt to these overlords.

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ