Supreme Court to resume Reko Diq hearing as Balochistan fights international arbitration

Provincial government contends its agreement with TCC is ‘void, illegal and unlawful’ .


Faisal Shakeel January 30, 2012

ISLAMABAD: The fight over mining rights of Balochistan’s gold and copper reserves is being waged at home, and abroad.

While the provincial government contests international arbitration, the Supreme Court has set February 2 for resumption of proceedings against the Tethyan Copper Company’s (TCC) right to extract reserves worth billions of dollars.

Objections to arbitration

In its preliminary objections to the International Chambers of Commerce in London (ICC), the Balochistan government has declared its agreement with TCC ‘unlawful,’ The Express Tribune learnt on Sunday.

The objections have been raised by a team of local and international lawyers including former British prime minister’s wife Cherie Blair, Arthur Marriot, advocate Ahmar Bilal Soofi and Balochistan Advocate General Amanullah Kanrani. Balochistan government and the TCC developed differences over the valuation of the gold and copper reserves in Riko Diq area of district Chaghai.

The team of legal experts raised objections after the TCC moved the ICC against the Balochistan government for rejecting its application for mining lease, upon the completion of the feasibility study.

The TCC has also filed a request for arbitration at the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes, against the federation.

The lawyers also dispute the jurisdiction of the ICC in taking up the matter. Until the Supreme Court decides the case against the legality of the agreement, it would not be in order for the ICC to take up the matter, the lawyers submitted.

The lawyers argue that the joint venture agreement between the Balochistan Development Authority and the TCC was ‘void and illegal’ because it entailed statutory independence of the licensing authority, and was against public policy. The lawyers say it was not a ‘concession agreement’ as popularly projected in media.

“It is in fact an agreement having an unlawful consideration to restrict the operation of an existing law – the 1970 Mining Rules,” the objections stated.

To TCC’s contention that it has a right to mining licence after completion of feasibility study, the lawyers submit that, in any case, the agreement did not guarantee grant of mining licence as a matter of right or in derogation of mining rules.

The lawyers add that the TCC could not have opted for international proceedings for it did not get approval of the Supreme Court.

The court, in its May 25, 2011 order, had allowed the Balochistan government “to expeditiously decide Tethyan’s application for grant of a mining lease and submit a report.”

Taking up the case again

After it adjourned the matter, members of Jamaat-i-Islami and the Workers Party, through their lawyer Raza Kazim, had asked the Supreme Court to take it up again, saying the TCC wanted to bypass the apex court.

The international arbitration tribunal would have no option but to give a decision in favour of TCC, which could lead to claims of billions of dollars in damages, if the court further delayed the proceedings, Kazim had submitted.

He asked the court to declare the agreement between the Balochistan government and TCC ‘illegal.’ His application would be taken up on February 2, according to a Supreme Court notice.

Published in The Express Tribune, January 30th, 2012.

COMMENTS (10)

Waqar Hasan | 12 years ago | Reply

Little do most Pakistanis know that SPD has the paraphernalia to mine and extract gold and copper ores from Reko Diq and elsewhere.This agreement,if implemented,will drastically benefit TCC but wont bring Pakistan much in terms of revenues.Balochistan govt is in a financial quagmire and it is virtually impossible for the provincial govt to even make a 25% initial investment for the project as the agreement entails.TCC will grant loan to the govt at 25% interest rate to make that investment.Furthermore,TCC is not ready for the extracted ore to be refined in Pakistan.This project is supposed to create stupendous employment in that region but that wont be the case if the agreement goes ahead.Dr Samar Mubarakmand must head this project.The issue of sharing revenues with a foreign corporation simply wont arise if the project is conducted indigenously.I hope the SC manges to protect this enormous asset of ours.Pakistan wont get anything but 2% royalty for this project if TCC gets the license.

TN, Advocate | 12 years ago | Reply

@ahmad: Hope and pray that rosy figures are correct. We have been listening to Thar coal reserves -- 175 billion tons BUT WHAT GOOD IS IT TO US? Let's be realistic about our natural resources! We don't have necessary funds, experts and equipment to develop gold or mega coal mine. TCC litigation won't let any donor agency come near Reko and we would end up like Steel Mill fiasco. Remember we were getting rid of Steel Mill for so called peanuts but ended spending Rupees 22 billion and now need another Rs. 8-10 billion to waste. The giant projects can only be run by private sector! Govt has miserable failed to run PIA, Railway, Steel Mill to name a few.

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ