Conspiracy always appears to be on the mind of self-proclaimed whistle-blower of the Memogate scandal, Mansoor Ijaz. But this time, he claims to be a victim to it, rather than aiding it through memos.
Through an application submitted by his counsel, Akram Sheikh, to the Supreme Court on Saturday, Ijaz accused “the establishment, the Gilani government and other interested parties of having struck a deal on brushing Memogate under the rug”. “There seems to be a convergence among the US and the Zardari-Gilani government on the memo issue,” Sheikh stated.
He said his client should not be blamed for refusing to travel to Pakistan, where Interior Minister Rehman Malik was ‘lying in wait’ for his client to ‘fall prey to his plot’.
Although Ijaz seems adamant to stay off Pakistani territory, he seems equally determined to maintain a role in the case. Referring to his importance as a witness, Ijaz stated in this application: “I still have hard evidence in the memo scandal,” adding that “the applicant holds valuable equipment/evidence which would settle this controversy, ie BlackBerry handsets, computers, data records, emails and notes of conversation with Hussain Haqqani, etc”.
“This aforementioned equipment/evidence is the only hard evidence to settle the controversy and if it ends up in the wrong hands, there is every possibility of tampering and destruction of the same,” he said in the application. He was unwilling to “violate the chain of custody that requires his own person” to deliver and explain the content of all the evidence available directly to the commission.
He said the Supreme Court mandated the commission to record the testimony of any ‘relevant witness’ and to collect evidence from Pakistan and abroad. According to Ijaz, the commission’s argument that the cost of travelling and Haqqani’s movement abroad were added hurdles in recording his testimony, does not hold weight – because parties were willing to bear their owns costs.
Haqqani could travel abroad subject to SC’s permission, which had asked him not to leave Pakistan without its consent, Ijaz said.
Published in The Express Tribune, January 29th, 2012.
COMMENTS (10)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
Dear Spymaster the drama you have created ends NOWHERE . . . .!!!!
And the dog ate my homework
Mr Ejaz is a CIA agent and should have come to Pakistan to prove his innocent. I am afraid his dishonesty and treachery is for all to see. Since he is an American citizen he may, he thinks, beyond reach but my advice for him is to be very careful - I am no supporter of the PPP government.
Hussain H also wrote against army/isi. Why blame him for commentary when msny politicians do the same here in Pak. A concept emerged where one to one meetings are by coas with President, pm and US generals and fate of 180 million people is decided with no record
Mansoor Ejaz:
You are a small fry in Pakistan's politics.
I will advise you to limit yourself as you do not stand anywhere, neither in Pakistan, nor in US.
Keep on doing commentary job for women wrestling in US.
as long as he can say something about zardari,,interested parties will remain interested just think if he was saying something that would have been supportive of this govt,or cud have proven innocence of zardari??
The government, establishment, bla bla every one is trying to rig the country....They will make the people fool by creating such issues in media and would avoid other issues like inflation, population growth, water crises, energy crises, etc. A few years back I was quiet and optimist about the country's future, but now I think pessimism has take its place. Believe me the same government is coming in the next election atleast as a collation partner, and we will hear democracy, democracy, democracy, democracy,.............
Why all of a sudden this rich American double agent so much interested in the internal affairs of Pakistan? Where was he when the whole world was donating for flood victims in Pakistan? What was this rich man's contribution then or before that? In fact at that time he was writing and talking against Pakistan, army, and ISI. All his statements not just a part be examined by the courts.
This is what I have been saying all along and had been proven correct again. Both the Establishment and the Government have things to hide. Establishment thought it can have the upper hand. The Judiciary controlled by the Establishment played along.The government played the masterstroke.by setting up the Parliamentary committee. MI also came out that he shall expose the Establishment. So, no one is interested.
I agree a deal has been struck, otherwise the Gilani Govt wouyld fall and AAz implicated in this natteer.I am sure evidence will appear eventually.