In Delhi — in many ways still a refugee city, although the multilingual capitalist class has burrowed away at the edges — everyone is an expert on Pakistan, of course, and much of it is driven by the black-and-white shrieking about a neighbour which it believes is really run by the army and the civilian government is only a ‘mukhauta’ or a mask.
But as we have seen in past weeks, the united colours of Pakistan are so much more varied and interesting. Whether or not Pakistan’s army chief has threatened the ruling class to operate within prescribed limits, it’s clear that the Zardari-Gilani government has decided to create a few rules of its own.
In Delhi, a sneaking admiration for the people shoring up the fort and refusing to let the rulers buckle, is fast gaining ground. It doesn’t matter that Nawaz Sharif’s petition in the courts actually helps the military, his implacable enemy, skewers the PPP, or that the courts have taken on a political role that far exceeds their jurisdiction or that both Mansoor Ijaz and former president Pervez Musharraf are planning a comeback to add to this chaos.
It’s clear in Delhi too that a coup, like in 1999, is hardly possible. In fact, quite the contrary. Both Gilani and Zardari may yet go down fighting, but to witness the courage with which they have tested themselves and their country’s all-consuming fear of the army by refusing to buckle so far is testimony to the people’s overwhelming yearning for democratic normalcy.
What is unfolding in Pakistan, really, is the stuff of which novels are made of. In authoritarian societies like the former Soviet Union or the former Czechoslovakia, it was easy to distinguish the extremes: The establishment that declared its writ with vigour and the tiny-but-rebellious underclass which sought to undermine the state from within.
But somewhere in that vast, faceless, majority were men and women who went about earning their daily bread but refused to succumb to the grey, enveloping fear. They were never important enough for the gulag nor for the sweet imprisonment of privilege. But imagine how they battled their fears within, on a daily basis and kept the flame alive. Right versus wrong. Personal choice versus collective good. It was their accumulated tiny victories that shored up people like Andrei Sakharov.
In our part of the world, the similarities end quickly. India accepted former prime minister Indira Gandhi’s emergency from 1975-1977 because of middle-class obsessions like trains running on time or, cleanliness is next to godliness. Just like in Pakistan, when the people hardly resisted the peremptory bundling out of Nawaz Sharif in 1999 because they were fed up with the all-consuming corruption during his era.
Both countries have learnt quickly. India will no longer accept an Anna Hazare-like figure, despite his apparent fondness for a Gandhian simplicity, because we know of his authoritarian streak that dismisses dissent.
As for Pakistan, you can’t but admire President Zardari’s panache as he recently flew to Dubai for a day and returned home, dismissing rumours that he was opting for a sinecure. Then there was Gilani, joking about Imran Khan and sacking the defence secretary in the same breath.
Whatever happens in Pakistan in the coming days, one thing is for sure: India’s people are keenly aware of the sophisticated courage on display in the ongoing eyeball-to-eyeball confrontation between the government and the army. And you must know that we’re cheering for you.
Published in The Express Tribune, January 23rd, 2012.
COMMENTS (22)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
Whatever the political future is I hope that there are more cheers than jeers from both sides of the border.Why is it so difficult to understand that our well-being is synergetic, that there are more good people than bad,that every individual is more good than bad,that we need not be best buddies but we surely can be adult mature accomodating neighbours?
Ms. Malhotra while commenting on Annaji, relies on the success of Indian politicians and their journalists. While she understands the authoritarianism of Anna, turns the other way to understand the feeling of Indians? Everyone other than Politicians and Journalists are authoritarians?.
I as Indian agree. I am rooting for PPP (Zardari/Gilani/Adnan?) have impressed me. I agree PPP must not get elected in the coming elections. The govt failed to improve pakistani's lives. But they are standing up to the Army/Courts. Just because this govt is unpopular does not mean, it can be kicked out by illegal means (judicial coup).
@ayesha khan
Very well said.I doubt, how many of young Indians know about JP and his movement. Please write more whenever you find an issue interesting and relevant at the present time..
Ms Malhotra is bang on as far as the courage part is concerned.
Mr Zardari has displayed this courage in the past too. He was incarcerated for a decade, much of it in solitary confinement under Musharraf, but he did not cut a deal and run away to Saudi Arabia.And he is not lounging around in London either, a la the Commando and the Only Truthful Stupidisco fan around.
In short, even the Goebbelsian campaign against the government can not hide the fact that the present civilian government of Pakistan has displayed extraordinary courage indeed.
@ayesha khan: - well written - are you the same who writes articles here occasionally too ?
Pakistan stands by the truth... and NOT by this treacherous government. If MEMO is real, which by the looks of it, looks VERY real, then Zardari and Co. should pack up and leave, if not hanged for treason.
Ms Malhotra Are you sure you are cheering? I am afraid you may be jeering (laughing in your sleeves)
I wish our masses could understand this fact.
Although your facts are not right but Thank you.
"India will no longer accept an Anna Hazare-like figure.."
Yes but they will readily accept figures like Rahul Ji and Kapil Sibal.
Does anyone else think that comments these days are more intelligent and interesting than the articles ?
I agree with some of the above insightful comments. The author is seriously misreading the events. I hope her views are her own and not that of Indis'a foreign policy makers.
"India" is cheering; I am already scared.
How 'admirable', huh.
A typical army coup is unlikely to happen in PAK but an army sponsored political establishment front is in the making and everyone around the world knows it. The PPP is holding on with US support, and what is India cheering for is stability in PAK, whether it is PPP,PML-N,PTI, or COAS.
It is a fact that no political party can survive in PAK without compromises with COAS party, and as such the author's view that Zardhari govt is resisting pressure from COAS party in the name of democracy and worth cheering is very naive.
"In our part of the world, the similarities end quickly. India accepted former prime minister Indira Gandhi’s emergency from 1975-1977 because of middle-class obsessions like trains running on time or, cleanliness is next to godliness. "
Not factually correct. Jai Prakash Narain started a jail bharo andolan that lakhs of people participated in. Indian Express ran newspapers with empty editorial space. Well known singers like Kishore Kumar refused to succumb and sing in Indira Gandhi's jalsas and as a result were blacklisted. Vajpayee, Advani, Morarji Desai, Sushma Swaraj, Arun Jaitley, Laloo Prasad Yadav - these were just FEW of the people who courted arrest resisting emergency and went to jail.
This is the reason Indira was compelled to hold elections in 1977 within 2 years of declaring emergency. Very different from Pakistan where dictators have ruled for a decade at a stretch 3 times over. In Arab countries ofcourse , the dictators ruled for over 3 decades at a stretch. Please do not compare these countries and Pakistan with India in this regard.
yes zardari is great
Ms. Malhotra. This government has about 11% or less approval of the public. Meanwhile army has around 50% approval rate. The people of India are a tad out of touch. The civil-military power relations is a real issue;but, this Government is not the right representative to take on this issue.