On this road, so far as I know, there are no notable remains going back any more than 500 years. But surely, lying under the cultivated fields and the foundations of modern housing, there would be some remarkable finds waiting to be uncovered. On this road, one monument dating to the reign of Akbar the Great, is Sarai Chhimba.
Now, in the 16th century, Multan and Lahore were both capitals of important provinces of the Empire. In order to facilitate the frequent traffic of important officials passing between the two cities, the emperor ordered caravanserais at a distance of roughly every 35 km — the length of an easy day’s journey. Sarai Chhimba, lying about 25 km south of Thokar Niaz Beg in south Lahore, was one.
Now, in the Middle Ages, sarais in the subcontinent were usually fortified. Consequently, Rawat (south of Rawalpindi) and Sarai Kharbuza (to the north), are erroneously believed to be fortresses rather than what they really are. Similarly, Rajo Pind across the Kahan River from Rohtas Fort is said to be a jailhouse, according to locals.
If it hadn’t been for the name Sarai Chhimba, this, too, would have been a fortress. The bulky gatehouse of its main entrance facing east, the massive peripheral wall with its vaulted basements and the impressive corner turrets have the very air of an impregnable fortress. The style is clearly reminiscent of the 16th century. The residential rooms for travellers are lined along the walls. The large compound was where their riding and pack animals were tethered.
The east gateway is the only way in or out, the one in the west is used as a house. The broad enceinte, taken over by poorly built houses, is a veritable village. But the worst part is that even the medieval walls themselves are now used as housing: the cavernous vaulted chambers below the perimeter wall are all homes. The residents have extensively damaged the ancient masonry to make new doorways or fit electric lights, fans and what have you.
In effect, Sarai Chhimba is no longer an historical monument. It is just another old building waiting to be vandalised by everyone. The residents of Sarai Chhimba have taken to destroying the edifice. Along the ramparts, there were once eight beautiful mock domelets, only decorative in function. Seeing them, I knew these peculiarly shaped domes had provided the model for the dome of the 18th century Sikh Guru Kotha in Wazirabad.
One resident was in the process of tearing down one of the four remaining domelets in March 2009. Upon inquiry, it turned out that he lived in this part of the sarai and the ‘useless’ thing stood in the way of putting charpoys on the roof! He was not bothered that the building was, by law, a protected monument which could not be altered in any way.
His reaction to my admonitions was not untypical. “All those important people in Islamabad were busy hacking away at the whole country; the sky wouldn’t fall if I pulled down one useless thing on my property.”
I also learned that most of the residents of the sarai are ‘newcomers’ of 1947. That, I suppose, takes away every sense of belonging to the land. First, their ancestors supposedly migrated from Arabia, Persia or Central Asia and then they from somewhere in India. They, therefore, do not belong to this land. So damn the land that is now their home. And with it, everything that belongs to it.
In January 2010, I was again in my ancestral village Uggi (Jalandhar). Our host Bakhshish Singh took us to see ‘Jahangir’. He said it was a fort, but it turned out to be a sarai. The building was under restoration. I noticed that they were using lime mortar, not cement as in Pakistan. Bakhshish was outraged by my suggestion that the fortified sarai be turned into a village as we do in Pakistan!
Published in The Express Tribune, January 21st, 2012.
COMMENTS (17)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@Homa, Vicram Bhai Afghanistan boudery line was up to Attock so we were not in india even that time. please correct it your geography.
@Bipul Rajput: Tathastu. Amen to that. @John B: I hope your will share your research findings with us. I would be very interested in learning more about the great temple, the glory of multan. @Ali T: Please see Vicram Bhai's comments. We, the subcontinent's natives accepted you as one of our own. Will the arabs accept you as their own? Will you be able to make arabia home? Will they even treat you as an equal human?
@Homa: " ... I would love for the glorious temple to be rebuilt at the same spot. ... "
We have to and we will.
@ John B: According to our family histroy as told by my grandmother, on certain days of the year, lots of pilgrim travelers used to come to prahladpuri for the big festivals held there (probably during the equinoxes, makar sankranti etc.). I would love for the glorious temple to be rebuilt at the same spot.
@Ali Tanoli: to @Homa - " ... This time u r bitter than me …. "
What exactly are you bitter about ? Your ancestors migrated to the sub-continent and made it their home. Nobody calls you an outsider. Will you be able to make Arabia home ?
And next time you talk about the so called injustices committed by India in Kashmir, Hyderabad, Junagadh, think about the cultural and numeric genocide committed upon Hindus by your brother Arabs.
@prashanth, u asked what good about Macca, Medina and iran dont ask from muslims this question and yeah for me indian land is also importent too but less than Mecca , Medina.
@Homa This time u r bitter than me ....
@Homa: Thank you. Narasingha of Multan is an added piece. By the descriptions left by various Arab travelers, it might very well be Narasingha. I am digging about the temple's contemporary history from other sources also.
@John B: while we are on the topict Multan's original name was Moolsthan which is Sanskrit for "Primordial Place". It was called thus because of its associations with the Mahavishnu tatwa, the Primordial Cosmic Force, and its earliest manifestations on Earth. Arab invaders could not pronounce the name moolsthan properly and it became multan. But the name is still sanskrit by nature with deep spiritual connotations. Most pakistanis would not even be aware of this cultural richness of the land's vedic past because of destruction of the hindu cutural legacy.
@prashanth: They are all very boring, insipid and ordinary places, thats what is special about them. They are mostly dry, waterless, arid, thirsty barren agricultureless desert regions without much tolerance for individual freedoms, difference and diversity. That makes them very special. @author: please continue telling us about our subcontinental history and the about the areas which we lost to the desert ideology. Im hungry to hear about them because i am an indian of seraiki ancestry. Arab lands dont matter to me, my stolen ancestral bhoomi does. @John B: my grandmother, who grew up in hindu multan, tells us stories about a fabulous and powerful sun temple in multan (destroyed long ago by the marauding foreign barbarians) called Prahaladpuri, built apparently at the spot where Lord Narasingha/Narsimh/Nrsingha, the half lion half man avatar of Lord Vishnu, is believed to have manifested to Prahalad, a supreme devotee of the Cosmic Soul in very ancient times. The festival of holi may have originated there since the festival actually commemorates the story of Prahlad, Holika and Hiranyakshipu. Also, it is believed that there were two glorious sun temples in ancient india, one in the west and one in the east. While the eastern Konark Sun Temple in coastal Orissa is still there and is today a symbol of classical India's cultural might, the western (Multan's Prahaladpuri Surya Temple) was completly looted and then destroyed -- you know by whom!
This is beyond tears. Such vandalism is not uncommon in India in spite of the efforts of Government. This is the price one pays for ignorance, illiteracy and greed!
@kaalchakra: Whats special about Mecca, Medina and Iran?
Please bang it into our heads, sir. We need to preserve our historical monuments.
Sir, although you write well and truthfully, you make too much of this land business. What is in a piece of land, one many ask? One is as good as another. As far as mattering is concerned, Mecca and Medina matter, and then the Arab lands, or Iranian - if you are a Shia. After that, this focus on land and land's history is unbecoming of a good human being.
Sorry to hear what is happening to the historical architectural past of present day PAK.
Whatever happened to the Hindu temple in Multan that housed the god ( made of aloe wood) of the ancient Hindus of the land who came far and wide in annual pilgrimage bringing aloe from Kumran?
I am dying to know about the vestiges of history of Multan of those times.
Sir, what can I say. I have ran out of adjectives.Enchanting as always.