Iraq veering towards 'Lebanonisation'

Published: December 14, 2011
Certain political parties who claim to speak on behalf of sect believe Lebanonisation of regime is in their interests. PHOTO: AFP/ FILE

Certain political parties who claim to speak on behalf of sect believe Lebanonisation of regime is in their interests. PHOTO: AFP/ FILE

BAGHDAD: Eight years after the fall of Saddam Hussein, Iraq is veering towards a “Lebanonisation” of its political system, with power permanently distributed along strict ethnic and sectarian lines, experts say.

For two governments in a row, the posts of president, premier and parliament speaker have been parcelled out to a Kurd, a Shia and a Sunni, all with deputies of the other two groups, a path analysts warn is dangerous.

“What we fear is a Lebanonisation and unfortunately, this is what is happening,” said Mowafaqal Rubaie, a former national security adviser, referring to Lebanon’s codified distribution of power.

“Certain political parties, who claim to speak on behalf of a sect, believe that a Lebanonisation of the regime is in their interests.”

For nearly 80 years, Iraq was ruled by its Sunni minority which did not cede power to the country’s Shia majority until after the 2003 US-led invasion.

What followed were years of horrific sectarian violence which peaked in 2006 and 2007, when tens of thousands of people were killed.

A year ago, Iraq’s political leaders all but made the new system official after more than eight months without a government following elections in March 2010.

They agreed to a government of national unity with the same outlines of one that emerged following the country’s previous parliamentary elections in December 2005.

Jalal Talabani, a Kurd, would retain the presidency with a Sunni and a Shia as his deputies; Nurial Maliki, a Shia, would remain prime minister with a Sunni, a Kurd and a Shia as his deputies; and Osama al-Nujaifi, a Sunni, was named speaker, with Shia and Kurdish deputies.

Such an agreement is similar in construction to Lebanon, where power is shared between 18 religious communities in a quota system that applies not only to ministerial posts, but also to top officials.

For Ihsanal Shammari, a political science professor at Baghdad University, “there are great similarities between the nature of the regimes in Iraq and Lebanon – the divisions are the same, based along ethnic and sectarian lines.”

“The only difference,” Shammari said, “is that here it is not written in the constitution like in Lebanon.”

The Lebanese constitution dictates that parliament seats be split between Muslims and Christians.

And the Taif Agreement that ended the 1975-1990 civil war says that the president must be Maronite Christian, the speaker of parliament Shia, and the prime minister Sunni, codifying an unwritten rule that dated back decades.

“Unfortunately (in Iraq), these quotas do not simply concern the three main posts – they have spilled over into government departments, and have had a snowball effect to the point of affecting who is chosen to work in parliament and government ministries, as well as the security forces,” Shammari said.

As a result, many Iraqis now complain of being kept out of employment in their chosen profession as a result of their ethnic or religious background, details that were taboo, at least officially, in Saddam’s Sunni-dominated regime.

Wissam al-Faili, an engineer of Kurdish ethnicity, was hired to work in the water resources ministry when its minister was a Kurd.

“Now, the minister is a Sadrist (a member of the bloc loyal to anti-US Shia cleric Moqtadaal Sadr), and the majority of the employees are now Shiite Arabs,” the 39-year-old said.

According to Ahmedal Sammaraie, a 36-year-old Sunni Arab working in the electricity ministry, “politicians, and even people in general, are not loyal to the country, unlike before 2003.”

“The sectarian and political quotas are present everywhere, and affect even the smallest of issues like groups of pilgrims (bound for the hajj in Mecca, Saudi Arabia), for which Shias are entitled to twice as many spots as Sunnis,” Sammaraie said.

And, much like Lebanon, neighbouring countries play major roles behind the scenes.

The fragile accord that led to the formation of Maliki’s unity government reflected the balance of power in the region, with the United States and its ally Saudi Arabia on one side, and Iraq’s neighbour Iran on the other, according to experts.

Also like Lebanon, little in the way of legislation is passed through parliament – key issues such as a law regulating the energy sector, or reform of the mostly state-controlled economy have languished, while permanent ministers of interior and defence have yet to be named.

“All the political parties have allegiances with foreign countries, and they have more (allegiances) than with their homeland,” said Shammari. “These links are the principal reason for the (political) deadlock.”

Rubaie, the ex-national security adviser, adds: “We cannot talk amongst ourselves, because we have allowed our neighbours to interfere.”

Despite this, he remains optimistic – the withdrawal of US forces due by year-end marks “a golden opportunity resolve the issues between us.”

“This is a great chance to avoid transforming Iraq into a second Lebanon.”

Facebook Conversations

Reader Comments (4)

  • Farhan
    Dec 14, 2011 - 6:00PM

    Why not US let Iraqis to rule their homeland? When US prefers some countries of region to interfere in Iraq and try to block some others, how the situation will improve?

    Just like Afghanistan, all the neighbours, including uncle sam, are playing politics in poor country.


  • j. von hettlingen
    Dec 15, 2011 - 4:21AM

    The sectarian conflicts will be intensified by the country’s wealth. Iraq has billions of barrels of oil, yet the resources are divided across sectarian lines. Most known resources are in the Shia populated areas of the south and the Kurdish north, with few resources in control of the Sunni population in the centre.
    Both President Talabani, the Prime Minister Maliki, had spent years in Iran while they were exiled by Saddam Hussein. As the two and the Shia-dominated government are at Iran’s bidding, Iraq could turn out to be another Lebanon.


  • antanu
    Dec 15, 2011 - 5:20PM

    Thats where Saddam was good…he understood the ground realities and ruled the country with iron hand to stay it undivided on ethnic lines.Of course he was an autocratic ruler but then which ruler is not? Today more than 50% of US population wants to end its wars…but who cares?It still keeps preparing new targets. WHICH RULER IS NOT AUTOCRATIC?


  • Straight_Talk
    Dec 18, 2011 - 11:02AM

    Iraq has to sort it out within itself. No country helps without interests. So lets not involve others or else Iraq should get ready to be dominated by outsiders.


More in World