We can't win Afghanistan war without winning Pakistan, says Panetta

US Secretary of Defence says it is important to reach out to Pakistan if US wants to dismantle Afghan militant havens.


Afp December 13, 2011

KABUL: US Secretary of Defence Leon Panetta said on Tuesday that it was important to reach out to Pakistan if the United States wants to dismantle Afghan militant havens.

"It's been said a number of times that ultimately we can't win the war in Afghanistan without being able to win in our relationship with Pakistan as well," said Panetta.

The US Secretary of Defence is visiting Kabul to discuss the situation in Pakistan and to reaffirm America's commitment to Afghanistan as Washington starts to withdraw combat troops and hand over security to Afghan forces.

"It's going to be important, as we continue to move and progress in our efforts in Afghanistan, that we continue to outreach to Pakistan. This has been a difficult and complicated relationship but it is an important relationship.

Pakistan shut the US supply line into landlocked Afghanistan on November 26 after the Nato attack on a Pakistani check post that killed 25 Pakistani soldiers, saying that the blockade could last weeks longer, and forced Americans to leave the Shamsi air base.

US officials have accused Pakistan of supporting the Afghan Taliban and its Haqqani faction, whose leaders are based on Pakistani soil.

"They have provided cooperation in areas that have been important to us and at the same time we've had some serious difficulties with regards to the operations that involve groups in the Fata (Pakistan's tribal belt) and groups along the border."

Pakistan called the November 26 attack deliberate. US commanders deny it was intentional. US investigators are due to submit a report on December 23.

"In the end Pakistan and the US do share the same concerns with regards to terrorism," said Panetta.

Afghanistan and the US troops’ withdrawal

The Pentagon chief says that violence is falling in Afghanistan, where the US has been at war with the Taliban for 10 years.

"I think 2011 will mark a turning point with regards with the efforts to Afghanistan," Panetta told journalists on the flight to Kabul.

"Troops have been able to reduce the levels of violence there. They are successful in securing some of the key areas in Afghanistan. There's greater success in the Afghan military and police."

The US has announced the withdrawal of 10,000 of its 100,000 troops by the end of the year, while 23,000 others will leave the country by the end of September 2012 after the summer "fighting season".

The number corresponds to the 33,000 "surge" troops ordered in by President Barack Obama in late 2009 in a bid to reverse the Taliban insurgency, defeat al Qaeda and quicken an end to the war.

Recent media reports, not denied by the Pentagon, say the focus of the US mission is turning increasingly to building up the Afghan army to take on more responsibility in the fight against the Taliban.

Panetta welcomed the "significant achievement" of a second phase of transition from Nato to Afghan security control, which was launched this month in conjunction with the planned exit of all Nato combat troops in 2014.

In the second wave, Afghan forces will take charge of six provinces, seven provincial capitals and more than 40 districts, including three in the southern province of Helmand, one of most deadly in the conflict.

More than half of Afghans live in an area included in either the first or second phase of transition, according to Karzai.

"That of course requires greater and greater efforts by the ANSF (Afghan National Security Forces) as they're moving to the lead," a senior US defence official said, speaking anonymously.

During his two-day visit, the former CIA director will also meet General John Allen, the US commander in Afghanistan, troops and US embassy staff.

The Pentagon chief, who made a brief stop in Djibouti before arriving in Kabul, will next travel to Iraq, Turkey and Libya.

COMMENTS (70)

Tauseef | 9 years ago | Reply

I think what he means is that Pakistan wont allow a stable Afghanistan that is free to choose India as its friend. We have too many and too strong a proxies there to allow for a peaceful Afghanistan.

PakJam | 9 years ago | Reply I am a Pakistani living in UK. India is a big country and I like most Indians. Both of my parents were born there. I have visited India in 2007 and really liked it. However my Indian friends should bare in mind that Pakistan is a reality. Nurturing a wish that one day Pakistan might become part of India again is really wishful thinking. We should really start thinking of collaborating together and fight the 'forces' which want to keep us enemies for their benefit. The only difference between our and your right wingers is, we wear green and your wear amber... nothing else.. Pakistan Zindabad... Jay Hind
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ

E-Publications

Most Read