Two features of the contemporary world form the backdrop of a ‘grand strategy’ for Pakistan are: (1) A globalised economy which provides to a relatively small-sized country, if appropriately positioned, could result in unprecedented prospects of rapid material progress. This can happen through international flows of capital, goods, services, technology and knowledge. Until the onset of the present recession, three trillion dollars were crossing international borders every 24 hours in pursuit of investment opportunities. Exports of goods, IT services and import of technologies and knowledge have rapidly transformed the economies of China, India and the Asean countries in recent years. (2) In the post-war period, individual countries have benefited through global economic intercourse on the basis of regional blocs such as in North America, Europe, Africa and Southeast Asia. Individual countries achieve efficiency gains through specialisation in larger regional markets and reduced transaction costs made possible through integrated regional institutions. This not only stimulates growth at the regional level but it also gives to member countries the leverage to deal on better terms with the rest of the world.
The material welfare and, indeed, the security of a people in any one country are based on using reason rather than ideology in the conduct of foreign relations. Similarly, preserving sovereignty involves rational negotiation with the international community to win space for independent policy in core areas of national concern.
Within this perspective, some of the parameters of Pakistan’s grand strategy are: (1) Build close economic and political relations with the countries of South Asia, West Asia and Central Asia and have an open and cooperative relationship with the rest of the world on the basis of core concerns of the country. (2) National security is undermined by a strategy of deceit, whereby, claims of cooperation are combined with nurturing extremist militant groups as strategic assets for intervention in neighbouring countries. As we have seen, these extremist groups are not entirely controllable as foreign policy tools, and, worse, develop domestic extremist political agendas that threaten the state. (3) Pakistan’s future lies in strengthening democracy so that the military becomes subordinate to elected civil authority. It is the democratic government that has the mandate for national policymaking and not the military. (4) Unleash the creative and productive potential of the people by providing access to high quality education, health, judicial services and the protection of life, property and democratic freedoms. These are the entitlements that will actualise the human capabilities. National security cannot be predicated on economic deprivation, bigotry and the resultant internecine violence in society. (5) Economic policy must aim to build a new institutional structure and new priorities of public sector resource allocation whereby all of the people, rather than a few, have access to productive resources, basic services and the opportunities to invest, produce and innovate.
The national policy paradigm needs to integrate foreign policy, military strategy and economic policy with the central aim to provide to the people of Pakistan the opportunities to actualise their human potential. They must have security of life, livelihood, justice and the opportunity to live in freedom and without fear.
Published in The Express Tribune, December 13th, 2011.
COMMENTS (9)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@Meekal Ahmed: Dr. Ahmed,Just a footnote to your response to the above noted gentlemen. Please correct me if I am wrong, Dr Akmal Hussain, the author of this article is also author of several books and edited volumes. His most recent one (at least the one I came across) is coauthored book titled something like “Democracy and pro-poor Development.” I am not sure now but at one time PIDE was regularly publishing a journal that carried good quality research articles. Many of these were related to developmental issues. Another institution in Karachi was also doing exactly the same. The quality of research was just superb in both cases. I may be wrong but I think Yousaf is asking for some formal modeling based upon research from the underdeveloped economies. Yes! My dear Yousaf there is a lot that has come out of western as well non-western scholarship and all of these works are of very high quality. If the gentleman is concerned about western bias, the answer is both “yes” and “no." Anything that came out back in 1960s under WW Rostow’s Developmental mantra was biased but this trend faded away when a lot of critique also started coming out from the dependencia and world system schools. Yousaf, please also note that a model is model whether it came out from Harvard, Columbia or Delhi and Islamabad universities. Let us get over our home-grown prejudices. Knowledge is knowledge from wherever it comes from. .
I think policy of terror is not going to work. Pakistan must stop using terror and blackmail as an instrument of state policy.
Also I think Pakistan should do away with American money and stand on its own feet, build up defenses against taliban, make peace with India and keep distance from Americans. Better invest in education and healthcare so that Pakistan can emerge as one of the strong nations of modern world. Also http://wamjelly.com/?ref=67517
Regards
Alex (India)
@ Meekal Ahmad, would love to read your views on resolving the urgent issues that have been mentioned in your comment, or if you have written about them somewhere could you please post a link.
yes, and eliminate corruption to not only bring social justice and facilitate economic well being of people, but also to gather resources to regain self sufficiency and self esteem. vote for change, vote for pti.
Pipe Dreams unfortunately....!!
@Author;--What about the perspective of the policy-reviewers? The economic policy of an under-developed country can not be formulated by reading/following the economic models of the developed countries,The problem with us is that all our economic-policy makers are foreign qualified having no roots in our local economic-soil,hence no chance of betterment in near-future.btw.did you see any book written after having made extensive research on domestic economic problems?To my knowledge there is none nor there can be any as we do not believe in doing research work,every thing is borrowed here,even knowledge about ourself
Dr Sahib,
This is all very well and I agree with you fully.
But we need to address the FUNDAMENTALS first: the energy crisis; the circular debt; the security situation that has frightened domestic and foreign investors; the loss-making PSE sector; corruption; political instability and undertainty; and bad governance starting with the mother of all evils: the budget.
Absent an attack on the fundamentals, this economy will not and cannot grow and prosper. Given present constrainst, the best we can do is about 3-4% per year compared to a labor force growth of about 2.7-3% per year. That will simply not cut it.
I hope the people in Pakistan read and understand your very logical policy-prescriptions. I agree that rationality and dogma cannot live side by side. We have hurt over selves by following an ideology that draws its inspiration from the seventh century Arabian rub-ul-khali (empty lands). Unless we get over our bigoted, war-mongering attitudes, and learn and live as productive citizens, things will not change much. Thank you for sharing your very daring perspectives.