Key US senators urge review of Pakistan funding

'US incredibly patient with Pakistan, despite certain undeniable and deeply disturbing facts,' the senators say.


Afp December 06, 2011

WASHINGTON: The United States must "fully review" its ties with Pakistan and consider cuts or new restrictions to military and economic aid, Republican senators John McCain and Lindsey Graham urged Monday.

A joint statement from the veteran American politicians conveyed the depth of feeling felt by many of their contemporaries in Washington about the need to re-evaluate a decade-long strategic relationship that has foundered this year.

"The United States has been incredibly patient with Pakistan. And we have been so despite certain undeniable and deeply disturbing facts," they said.

"The time has come for the United States to fully review its relations with Pakistan. We must assess the nature and levels of our support."

McCain serves as the top Republican on the Senate Armed Services Committee, while Graham is a member of that panel and is the top Republican on the committee that allocates US foreign aid.

"All options regarding US security and economic assistance to Pakistan must be on the table, including substantial reductions and stricter standards for performance," they said.

The senators then cited alleged support from Pakistani army and intelligence officials for the Haqqani network "and other terrorist groups" blamed for attacks on US targets in Afghanistan "that are killing US troops."

Such actions require that "US policy toward Pakistan must proceed from the realistic understanding that certain actions of Pakistan's military are contributing to the death and injury of our men and women in the military and jeopardizing our national security interests," said the senators.

Ties between Washington and Islamabad plummeted after a US commando raid killed al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden in the Pakistani garrison town of Abbottabad, just two hours drive north of the capital Islamabad, in May.

Relations slid to a new low last month when Nato air strikes killed 24 Pakistani soldiers on the Afghan border, prompting Pakistan to boycott the Bonn Conference on Afghanistan's future.

Islamabad officials have also refused to cooperate in a US investigation into the November 26 incident. President Barack Obama offered condolences and assured the Pakistanis that their troops were not deliberately attacked.

McCain and Graham also offered their "deep condolences" over those killed in what they called an "unfortunate and unintentional" strike and predicted the investigation would "clarify the circumstances of this terrible tragedy."

"The Pakistani government's response to these events, however, has been deeply troubling and has added to the continued deterioration of our relationship," they added.

They were referring to Pakistan's decision to prevent Nato supplies from reaching Afghanistan, ordering US intelligence officers to leave the country, and boycotting the Bonn conference, and reports that Islamabad may have decided to suspend all bilateral counter-terrorism agreements.

"Such steps by the Pakistani government would mark a new low for our relationship," they warned.

Bruce Riedel, a former CIA officer who led an interagency review of US policy toward Pakistan and Afghanistan in early 2009, on Monday said the United States should give greater weight to containing the Pakistani army.

Speaking at a panel discussion in the US capital, he said that for now, Washington was "not doing enough on the containment part. We're slipping and sliding into it, but I think without a coherent framework."

According to Riedel, the Pakistani army is gradually installing a new military dictatorship, without even needing to resort to a coup.

"The new military dictatorship that is emerging in Pakistan will be very different from its predecessors," he said.

"The facade of civilian government is likely to continue to go on... with very little real power. The media will continue to be very active and alive, except when they criticize the military."

Facebook Conversations

COMMENTS (58)

Phannay Khan | 8 years ago | Reply | Recommend

@MarkH: If your argument is so correct then tell me whats going on financially in the USA itself? OWS? 14 Trillion debt crisis? Downgrading of Credit rating? Printing Money to support wars ? Pension funds disappeared? Before talking about the rest of the world as GOD, one has to look at ownself. And the reality is the picture is quite bleak financially. Is not it This reason that US is invading rest of the world to gain from it financially? Unfortunately, It hasn't worked well either for it.

MarkH | 8 years ago | Reply | Recommend

@Fareedi: That's not what it means. It means you're just going to die without any compensation, perks or anything positive that could be a gain anywhere. Keep turning your back to the concept that you're not a victim but instead someone who will be fighting this war with or without the US. You're just making it easier for the militants to put a bullet in that back and those conditions are their preference as well.

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ

Load Next Story