Bonn conference: How significant is Pakistan’s absence?

Officials believe decision will not be a major setback as few tangible results were expected at Bonn.

Kamran Yousaf November 30, 2011


Pakistan has already agreed to the draft of the Bonn conference, even though it is boycotting the key international gathering to be held in the German city from December 5.

However, Islamabad’s decision to stay away from the conference, which has been a year in the planning, is being seen as a setback to international efforts that seek to stabilise the war-torn country before Western forces pull out from Afghanistan by 2014.

A senior government official, who was supposed to be part of the Pakistani delegation at the conference, said Islamabad’s absence will only have a symbolic value. “We have already agreed to the draft of the Bonn conference,” said the official, who asked to remain anonymous. He maintained that Pakistan initially voiced concerns on certain points of the proposed draft but those reservations had been addressed.

Without going into details, the official pointed out that the government’s main area of concern was that the conference not be used as a forum to point fingers at Pakistan. “We have been assured that no such thing would be part of the final draft,” he said.

Conference not expected to yield major breakthroughs

Pakistan’s decision will also not be a major setback because few tangible results were expected at Bonn, despite the attendance of US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and other government ministers.

The conference was organised with the expectation that Washington and Kabul would have pinned down by then what their strategic relationship would look like after the departure of foreign combat troops, but talks on this have dragged on inconclusively.

Foreign ministry officials opposed boycott

Sources have said that senior foreign ministry officials were in favour of attending the Bonn conference. The officials were of the view that Pakistan must attend the conference at least at the ambassador-level, sources added.

Foreign Minister Hina Rabbani Khar was to lead the Pakistani delegation at the conference to be attended by 90 countries as well as representatives from the United Nations to finalise a roadmap for post-war Afghanistan. “We should have attended the conference and used it to convey our concerns on the Nato attacks,” said a foreign office official while speaking on condition of anonymity.

It is believed that the security establishment has pushed for the boycott after the inadequate response from the US over the Nato air raid. The decision to boycott the Bonn conference was originally taken in the emergency meeting of the cabinet committee of defence just hours after the Nato attack. However, the announcement was delayed for a couple of days in the hope that Washington might come up with a convincing response to pacify the anger.

(Read: Aftermath of NATO air strike)

Published in The Express Tribune, November 30th, 2011.


alami musafir | 10 years ago | Reply Pakistan's absence has been described thus: "The Bonn meeting will seek to chart a course for Afghanistan after the NATO withdrawal, but a boycott by Pakistan has dealt a stinging blow to hopes for a roadmap." (see These remarks completely contradict the tone of the above article which seeks to belittle Pakistan's importance. The precarious economic state of the West makes it likely that, given the opportunity, they will cut and run in Afghanistan (as they did after the Soviets were defeated), leaving Pakistan and Afghanistan to pick up the pieces. Pakistan must not oblige them. Not until they pay in advance for the postwar reconstruction and nation-building of both Afghanistan and Pakistan, in gold dust (much harder to counterfeit than tungsten cored fake gold bars). Currency is just coloured paper, very easy to debase. Around five thousand five hundred metric tons of gold (equivalent to 317 billion dollars) should cover it. Reconstruction contracts should be given to local firms, who can of course import machinery from the most competitive supplier. But emphasis should be on developing local expertise. The added advantage of this scheme is that it would kickstart the global economy as well as end the Afghan war permanently without endangering the West. So yes, Pakistan should boycott Bonn and all other Afghan meetings until the gold is delivered.
Babar F. | 10 years ago | Reply

Ha ha! The conference was to set the road map for future of Afghanistan and U.S. strategic relationship in the areas. Did no one get the tone set by the U.S & Afghan by bombing Pak troops what the future Strategy and Road map will be like? Why do Pakistan has to attend when the conference is all ready to turn their guns at Pakistan just to seal the humiliation we face by helping them out in the first place. All troops must go home NOW, this was a sham from the day one. Pakistan got along due to the inherent Muslim nature of "feeling guilty" even when CIA & FBI are involved in all sorts of self-serving magic tricks around the globe 24/7/365.

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ


Most Read