Sadly, the authenticity of this phenomenon is being questioned by the ruling PPP in more or less the same terms as were employed against the emergence of the PPP in the late 1960s. After Imran Khan’s impressive demonstration of support in Lahore, observers like me argued that it was qualitatively different inasmuch as it brought out the middle class, the youth and women. But the same evening, a particularly pugnacious PPP lady, who wears a smug, superior and often supercilious mask at TV talk shows, rubbished the Lahore gathering as a musical concert; not even a political meeting at all. Imran Khan continues to draw large and exuberant crowds.
The unexpected success of Imran Khan’s new wave public meetings has predictably triggered off a flood of applications for membership from established politicians, including the ‘electables’ enjoying autonomous vote banks. This development mirrors a similar process in the PPP after Zulfikar Ali Bhutto had demonstrated his rapport with the masses. Inevitably, it has raised for the Tehreek-i-Insaf the same problem it once did for the PPP: would this large influx strengthen the pristine purposes of the party or substantially modify them as a trade-off between conceptual orthodoxy and electoral success.
The PPP was launched as a platform for progressive forces. Together with like-minded people from his own class, Bhutto attracted leftist groups of various ideological hues. Once he consolidated his grip on power, the PPP was inundated with traditional politicians, especially from the feudal classes.
Domestically, the party carried out a botched-up nationalisation campaign and then struggled with its negative fallout. Externally, Pakistan stood with Third World leaders with anti-imperialist postures as well as with a ‘Muslim’ constituency inspired by King Faisal of Saudi Arabia. Benazir Bhutto retained the rhetoric but realigned the party with forces of democracy, neo-liberal economics and human rights that prevailed upon the ‘East’ in the Cold War. The Musharraf dictatorship forced her to seek western support, conditional in nature, to make a fresh bid for power. In a conversation in Dubai, not too long before her life was tragically cut short, she shared with me some preliminary ideas on how she would re-synthesise various strands in the new PPP. She had the intellectual calibre and diplomatic skills to carry out this formidable task but her death left the party in the hands of people who do not feel the need to do so. The PPP has already lost its exceptionalism and runs the risk of being derided by the nation as addicted to corruption and as a handmaiden of alien interests.
Imran Khan needs to broaden the base of his party if he wants to bring about fundamental changes in state and society. Many of the newcomers will not only seek his ticket but also a political ethos to which they are accustomed. Zulfikar Ali Bhutto never quite succeeded in balancing clashing tendencies in the PPP. The next few months will show if Imran Khan has in place mechanisms to do so and preserve the party’s core values.
Published in The Express Tribune, November 27th, 2011.
COMMENTS (11)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
Sir,
Most respectfully, why do we have to bring in our "dear and great neighbour", as Zia called them, every time?
I am not so old as to remember the very early days but I do know that Bhutto turned to the IMF and so did Zia, BB, NS, Mush and the present lot.
Since every government that I can recall did (and failed), I was suprised that you would only mention BB as having "re-aligned" herself to neo-liberal policies.
That was my point, respectfully submitted.
Who cares about what India, Turkey or Brazil were doing at the time?
I am honoured by the splendid comments that highlight aspects missed out or inadequately hinted at in a piece decreed not to cross the 700-word limit.The present PPP leadership has nothing to offer except a mythology of martyrdom whereas the Party underwent great changes, admittedly none to a logical conclusion. My text notes that even Mr. Bhutto failed to reconcile the contradictions in it. @Meekal Ahmad, Sir: People like me can testify that she grasped the need to carry out the kind of realignment I mentioned even before it became policy in neighbouring India.You understand much better than I do why India was successful and why Pakistan failed under Benazir Bhutto and Musahrraf. The present lot is not even trying.
All talk of Pakistan,making a about turn for better is point less untill this country does social and strucural adjustment.-+There has been so many false move,it is no use rehashing them,every one with an ounce of common sense knows it,focus should be what can be set right on short term and what needs long term solution,to start,base policy on reality on ground and realism,mainly,policy towards India and USA,if you realise the common link is terrorism.So if one can put a reasonable check on extremist,you can than focus on economy and trade,with economy on sound footing,other ills will be drastically less surmountable,India turned around once economy was put on realistic footing away from Sociaalitic Uthopia,the corruption,mis goverance,population control and communal tension next.So there is way out if you have a game plan,look USa employs the same game plan what every NFL team team on every sunday,then next week different game plan,that why USA is first world country and we are stuck in Islam,mosque and "Janat and Janhum" in brief I have said what can be a game plan for Imran Khan,a minimum platform.,I mean no disrespect for Islam or Pakistan,Friends warn,enemy strikes,I'm a well wisher of both Pakistan and Tribune Express.Thank you
BB realigned herself with "neo-liberal economics"?
So did ALL of them if you mean going begging-bowl-in-hand to the IMF in particular and other multilateral insitutions!
And since all the programs were abandoned half-way (except for Mush's time -- or so it was claimed), what kind of realignment was it after all?
In cricketing terms it would be playing a "half-cock" shot. Neither fully on the front nor the back foot. Often gets you into trouble. The results speak for themselves.
True Bhutto's nationaization hurt, especially the Robber Barons and they went into a long sulk. But it suprised me to learn from Dr Pervez Hasan's book (My Life, My Country) that the PSDP (Public Sector Development Program) touched a historic 10% of GDP in his time even if he did not live to see the big projects he launched come to fruition.
Today our PSDP is about 3% of GDP and it shows.
About Imran, yes, he needs to broaden the base. The risk is that in doing so he will take on all the discards and tax-cheats that he purports to be against. Simply saying he will only take on "clean" people who "declare their assets" is not only naive and exposes his lack of intellectual depth but an insult to any intelligent thinking person.
Very well written article and you've raised some very valid points. Let's hope for the best.
@Noor Nabi: IK is sufi in orientation based on his philanthropic interests and spiritual past. So less worries there. But breaking the military-mullah alliance will take a bit longer. I think we should address the socio-economic conditions that are worsening the trend rather than fixing the ideology in the short-term. If we just focus on sound development economics, many of the issues will be addressed along the way.
Great analysis. I think balancing the needs of urban vs. rural politics and idealism vs. pragmatism of electioneering is what PTI has to strive for in the days ahead. I guess you can't change the system without penetrating the system, at least for the first time around!
Imran Khan, if he can win the requisite number of seats through a fair election, deserves a chance to lead Pakistan. The salvation of the country, however, lies in abandoning its ties with Salafism and breaking the military-mullah axis that has bedeviled its past as well its present. If Imran is unable to crack this nut then no matter what he does it will all be in vain.
Time alone will tell whether Imran Khan has the ability to successfully chart his changed political fortunes.