But then, what was the reason for Ijaz’s exertions during that blighted week of May 2011? Do we know the dramatis personae — the full cast — and not just the political adventurer, Mansoor Ijaz and the unlikely ‘fall guy’, Husain Haqqani? And why did Ijaz blow the whistle so soon by rushing to print? In a rolling story, one can only go by some facts and some conjectures.
One, the memo does exist as a monumental testimony to a crude conspiracy hatched and abandoned in haste. Two, linguistic analysis shows it was not drafted in Islamabad but in the United States, probably by the author of the Financial Times’ op-ed piece. Haqqani’s prose is much more elegant, though one cannot rule out his having ‘tweaked’ it. Determination of his contribution depends on whether the transcript of alleged ‘conversations’ with Ijaz is genuine or an audacious forgery.
We enter the world of conjecture as we ponder the plot further. The OBL curtain-fall was read and projected as a moment of the Pakistan Army’s ultimate humiliation. Presumably, short-sighted friends of Pakistan’s elected government saw in it an opportunity of all times to stage a coup against the army and the ISI with anticipated assistance from Washington. Ideas flew across continents and a mysterious ‘WE’ became the putative authors of a quixotic offer that took in even the skilfully concealed desire to place Pakistan’s nuclear programme under American control. Mansoor Ijaz also sketched the penumbra of the dark plot by suggesting preposterously that Jahangir Karamat and Mahmud Durrani were also on board and available for a new security and foreign policy team. The message to Washington was that the ‘We’ of the memo was a tactical euphemism for Zardari. With its global experience of civil and military establishments, Washington did not take the bait. End of the plot; time for a whistleblower and his inscrutable new motives.
Where does this leave Husain Haqqani? He has always maintained a lobby in Pakistan to advance his limitless ambition and used his intellectual and other gifts to establish a degree of control on President Zardari’s mind that, historically speaking, has brought sovereigns and empires to grief. He can, therefore, ride the storm. But there are several reasons why his present innings should come to a close.
He is much too controversial to handle anymore Pakistan’s most difficult international relationship. I have a large notebook containing extracts on the art of diplomacy from numerous sources, but the one that comes to my mind readily is not from Machiavelli, Metternich or Kissinger, but Spock saying in Star Trek : “I must acknowledge, once and for all, that the purpose of diplomacy is to prolong a crisis”. Surely neither Zardari nor Husain Haqqani would want to do that to the troubled Pakistan-US relations.
Robert Burns once wrote: “Oh would some power the giftie gie us / To see ourselves as others see us / It would from many a blunder free us, and foolish notion.” Right or wrong, most Pakistanis believe that Haqqani has worked for total American hegemony in Pakistan and that he has personally directed a media campaign to trash Pakistan’s China policy. Grossly oversized in his influence, ambition and reach, he has not only completely outgrown the traditional role of an ambassador but has also hobbled Pakistan’s foreign ministers, foreign secretaries and the cabinet. Husain Haqqani should now rise transparently to his full and complex stature by getting elected to parliament to cut Pakistani military and intelligence services to size and leave professional day-to-day diplomacy to lesser beings. Alternatively, he can give himself a sabbatical and write a bestseller.
Published in The Express Tribune, November 23rd, 2011.
COMMENTS (16)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
Mr. Hussain Haqqani is at best a very unreliable, very ambitious, mercenary sort of person and without any scruples, loyalty, ideology or principles like Mr. Rahman Malik. Mr. Zardari is paying the price of fighting with a mercenary army, who are very greedy for rewards if there is a victory and who run at the first sign of a defeat.
@buttjee:
Corruption is endemic to societies maturing in capitalist economies without a completely representative democracy and evolved institutions to put a check on it. Today's Asia is not therefore different and corruption is quite visible in the two representative but politically different societies like China and India that continue to grow and prosper despite the scourge of corruption. And the sooner the political economies evolve to the stage of Japan, South Korea, Singapore and Taiwan corruption will be part of the underground economy, as we use to term as "Black" in India and Pakistan 50 or even more years ago.
I remembered reading this article in Time magazine in 1967 and went back to it and discovered nothing has changed in these 4 and half decades later as Asia plays catch up with the post industrial economies of the West
US.http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,840959,00.html
But what Pakistan suffers from a problem that is ten times larger, and could end up destroying Pakistan itself as it exists in territorial, ethnic, economic boundaries. And further dictate the socio-economic conditions of the areas it comprises for a few generations down the road.
If Pakistan moves into the gray area of being in the stage of the sixth Khillafat, now being announced from such irrelevant places till yesterday like Tunis. Whose political victors while ascending to power through the democratic process are at the same time supportive of sectarian strife in Bahrain in its support of the Bahraini Monarchy. It will have terrible consequences for the general population seeking a better economic future while socially coming to terms with the twenty first century.
So what are the choices for a Pakistani American viewing the current Pakistani situation unfold where the Hizb e Tehrir is lurking in the background that would be Pakistan's undoing of the ideological foundations of the nation for which it was created
One can only be supportive of the largest political tents available that is not limited to ethnicity and nor to sectarian or religious cover.
@Abbas from the US: Sitting in US, away from Pakistan you may not be aware of the state of affairs in your country today. During the last 3 1/2 of PPP rule almost all the institutions and autonomous corporations have been brought to a state of bankruptcy due to bad governance and unabated corruption. Don't you think this is already enough for this poor country that you are asking for another term for this horrible Govt.
@ abbas from US. Sound reasoning. For a change, Pakistan's leaders have made an excellent choice. Sherry Rehman is intellectually superior to Hussain Haqqani and has the additional advantage of an ethical framework that is the essence of diplomacy, notwithstanding numerous about diplomats.
@ Meekal Ahmad, Sir The quotation from Spock was the only rude thing I could afford to put down the main characters. Not Machiavelli,not Metternich, not Kissinger but the stuff of Hollywood's science fiction. The founding fathers of the Pakistan Foreign Service never lacked gravitas or dignity. They made mistakes but ensured a professional reputation for Pakistani diplomacy that these upstarts have destroyed.
@ abbas from US. Sound reasoning. For a change, Pakistan's leaders have made an excellent choice. Sherry Rehman is intellectually superior to Hussain Haqqani and has the additional advantage of an ethical framework that is the essence of diplomacy, notwithstanding numerous about diplomats.
@
Arif Q : professional jealousy? A much acclaimed Oxford educated former Foreign Secretary who has held numerous ambassadorial postings vs an opportunist par excellence, who has dug his own hole and jumped into it. No sir. You are wrong.
Good shot, Mr. Diplomatman.
Sir,
I was happy to see you did not use the word "crisis" until you quoted, of all people, Dr Spock.
Hussain Haqqani may have numerous contributions to Pakistan but, by law, when you investigate some allegation, not to mention the level of alegation and its consiquences, you do not give credit to accused about his past good deeds. Also, when someone poses himself as to be a stakeholder rather than representing a stakeholder, he loses the credibility. Hussain Haqqani has definitely way overstepped his moral as well as constitutional obligations if he is involved in this memogate. I will not be surprised to find out years later that Zardari was the actuall sourse of this conspiracy. Whoever was the source and used Haqqani, he himself would compromise Haqqani at this point. Haqqani took the risk to star in Washington, just couldn't anticipate how vulnerable the partners (Ijaz, Zardari, Others) can be sometimes. Afterall, everyone saves his back. Poor Haqqani!
On finishing reading your brilliant article my sense of dread and anxiety has gone up a notch.
I wrote this Op-Ed piece on Saturday, November 19 but it had to wait in a publishing queue till November 23. Apparently, Pakistan's Prime Minister demanded Ambassador Hussain Haqqani's resignation on November 22 and promptly accepted it. The delay in tendering resignation by him has deepened the crisis and there may well be a continuation of political moves to weaken President Zardari for allegedly being the "boss" in Hussain Haqqani's conversations with Mansoor Ijaz. The episode is already an addition to the excited agenda of the political parties to force a fresh election.
Khan Sahib, all was going well till the last para where you seem to expose a sense of professional jealousy. You can disagree with the honorable Haqqani but have the grace to acknowledge his remarkable contributions as Ambassador in extremely difficult times. That too would be called diplomacy.
Only a low life would conspire to write a secret memo to the leaders of another country. As the experts say, the memo was written in the US and not by HH. Why would sombody conspire that and keep a recording? Mansoor Ijaz has spoken against ISI and demanded the US govt to call it a terrorist organization. The same ISI gen Pasha goes and meets MI on public expense. The timing and cooperation between MI and Pasha is fishy to say the least. The best way HH can serve US/Pakistan relationship is to come back and work in the media.
Any Pakistani representative that is now deployed to repesent Pakistan's interest must also be representative of the power center of the Presidency and the Prime Minister's office. Failing that if this representative is limited to representing the power center of the Armed Forces/ Intelligence agency and the establishment it would be concluding a diplomatic failure even before the assignment. Pakistan's relationship with its most important foreign partner cannot be relegated to an appointment from the Pakistani diplomatic corp, who would take a lengthy period of time to establish rapport between the Foreign Office and the American officials who can react instantly to rapidly changing situations within Pakistan, Afghanistan, India and Iran and not to forget China. Any time wasted by the new Ambassador who if viewed with suspicion in establishing personal contacts and relationships with individuals like Secretary of State Clinton, Senators Kerry, Senator Lugar, Genral Pattreus and other important members of the current Administration will be Pakistan's loss. Meanwhile President Zardari and Prime Minister Gilani have to work politically to revive the failing fortunes of the PPP in reclaiming another mandate to conforont the inevitable at a better time then the current situation allows for.