Five interrelated policy challenges need to be addressed at the individual country level on the basis of regional cooperation within the SAARC framework: (i) Rapid implementation of free trade and investment envisaged in the South Asian Free Trade Agreement needs to be undertaken. Inspite of commendable recent progress, South Asia remains the least integrated region in the world. Intra-regional trade as a share of total trade in South Asia remains at about five per cent, which is the lowest for any region in the world. Other measures of integration such as cross-border investment; cross-border movement of people; sharing of ideas; communication as measured by telephone calls (only seven per cent of international telephone calls are regional, compared to 71 per cent in East Asia); and transfer of technology and royalty payments are all extremely low. Achieving greater economic integration will require substantially improved regional connectivity and overcoming interstate tensions and mistrust; (ii) The process of economic integration and the welfare of people should not be held hostage to the resolution of interstate disputes. Indeed, as economic integration is undertaken, new constituencies for peace will emerge that will facilitate the resolution of interstate disputes. Nevertheless, the core issues of cross-border terrorism and outstanding territorial disputes such as Kashmir must be addressed to establish the basis of lasting peace; (iii) Inspite of impressive economic growth rates in the last two decades, mass poverty persists in South Asia as this region is home to half of the world’s poor population. Therefore, it is necessary to change the structure of the existing elite-based economic growth process which induces increasing income inequalities and constricts the poverty reduction effect of growth. A new inclusive growth process needs to be undertaken whereby the middle classes and the poor can have access to productive resources, high wage employment and equitable access over factor and product markets. Saarc can provide the framework for sharing and pursuing best practices in this regard; (iv) Strengthening democracy by making it more participatory. This involves creating institutional structures for decentralised governance from the federal to the provincial/state, district and down to the grassroots levels: the purpose being to enable people to participate systematically in decisions that affect their economic and social life, their physical security and the life-support systems of the natural environment; (v) Climate change and the expected intensification of existing water stress in some countries of South Asia, food shortages and rising sea levels threaten the stability of economies and societies in South Asia. Regional cooperation to undertake joint adaptation and mitigation measures to face this crisis are therefore necessary.
The future of South Asia is delicately poised like a dewdrop on a blade of grass. We need to draw upon our civilisational wellsprings of innovativeness to chart a new course for ourselves and the world.
Published in The Express Tribune, November 15th, 2011.
COMMENTS (10)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
Looks like Economics and Business and by extension the Bania is going to have the last laugh. What say the members of the ghairatmand martial race?
@Ahmed:
You are absolutely right. In the 1000s China has had a bigger economy than India, but India had a much bigger economy then China during the 0000 to 1000 AD.
@Author,
The question to be asked is if this economic integration is needed then why break up India in 1947? Why should India push for an integration beyond a certain point? The area it has lost doesn't seem to have affected its trajectory much nor has impacted the sheer number of resources it has natural and otherwise. Why should India opt for it? If it should then what was the reason behind Pakistan?
Border disputes which are hampering economic cooperation are only present in south asia. Nowhere on earth do neighbours not trade and continue being poor because of some 60 year old dispute. 63 years have gone past. perhaps in another 37 years, we will have moved on.
India and China had been the real engines of the world economy for the most part of human history. India was always about 25 % of the world economy. That is quite like the US today. But for that trade and investment and people-to-people exchange the vital. How can that happen if we are still fighting with the unfinished business of the partition ? Surely we can start but soon there will be a terror attack by some state-sponsored proxies and everything will fall flat. The problem between India and Pakistan is very fundamental. We understand our combined potential. But we are not ready to combine as a unit to realise those potential. On the contrary we invite outside powers to get involved in our differences and thereby increase our bitterness for each other. These figures are all very rosy but will never have any real use. For southasia to realise its destiny it will never be India and Pakistan. It may be India or Pakistan.
According to historical economists (fascinating area of study, by the way), India and china accounted for 75% of the worlds economy for thousands of years. Except for the decline during colonianalism. Sometimes India was larger. Some times chins was larger. it now is just going back to the norm. So nothing novel about all this at all. Yawn.....
Ahmed
The author is telling nothing new or earth shaking. South Asia - the undivided India and surroundings accounted for 25% - 30% of the Global GDP for thousands of years. China accounted for another 25% - 30% of the Global GDP too during this period. Persia, Arabia, Mesopotamia accounted for another 15%-20%. The rest of the world accounted for the remainder. America was not even discovered then.
The last 200 years of European colonialism ( a blink of eye in 5000 years of recorded history) was when Indian share fell and fell from the glorius 25%-30% to negligible. 5000 years worth of Indian wealth was looted in less than 200 years by colonialists.
So it is not surprising to see India and China going back to their original shares of Global Economic might.
South Asia together with China, could become the greatest economic powerhouse India the third largest Rapid implementation of free trade South Asian Free Trade Agreement transfer of technology and royalty payments are all extremely low economic integration and the welfare of people
AND
disputes such as Kashmir existing water stress
Now tell me ,Why in the world we talked about SOUTH ASIAN ECONOMIC INTEGRATION??? To Solve Kashmir and Water issue ?
Why can't you guys ever remember DURAND LINES and Nothern Alliance ? when you talked about Economic integration ,Pakistan have had given real HARD TIME to Afghan Transit ? Why in the world India should TREAT you better than you treat Afghan? Because Indian work hard to get this prosperity and now you want SHARE of this prosperity?? Why We are still living in fools Paradise.
Sir,
If South Asian countries doesn't keep China at arms length and have Oile and Water relationship, South Asia will never achieve what it is capable off.
Before anything can happen, Pakistan needs to set aside its animosity towards Afghanistan, India and Banglsdesh which are the anchor countries. Territorial soveriegnty can achieved only through econmic superiority.
I cannot believe that after seeing the utter failure of EU right before our eyes people are still pressing for economic integration, common currency and such mumbo jumbo. EU/Euro/Eurozone has been the biggest economic failure of mankind which will take down with it a lot of hard earned wealth of people. Please wake up and desist from publishing such wishy washy articles.
Well said Dr Sahib and eloquently put. But SAARC has been a deep disappointment. All they do is talk.
We were never able to take the old RCD very far. Just gup-shup and lots of entertaining and travel at government expense.
I have come to the conclusion that we are a non-serious people and eloquent words form people like you are either not understood or simply ignored.
Actually both.
Sorry for being so down-beat and cynical but keep the light burning.