After three days of deliberations by the jurors at Southwark Crown Court in London, Judge Jeremy Cooke was informed on Monday that they could not reach a decision they all agreed upon.
He told the six men and six women to try to reach an unanimous verdict but said he would now accept a majority verdict of 10-2.
They still did not reach a decision and so were sent home to resume their deliberations for a fourth day at 1000 GMT Tuesday, the 20th day of the trial.
Butt, 27, and Asif, 28, have both pleaded not guilty to charges of conspiracy to obtain and accept corrupt payments, and conspiracy to cheat at gambling.
Prosecutors allege that the pair conspired with British agent Mazher Majeed and bowler Mohammad Aamer to deliver three intentional no-balls during the Lord’s Test between Pakistan and England in August 2010.
Over three weeks of evidence at Southwark Crown Court, the jury has heard that there are huge sums to be made by fixing parts of matches, known as spot-fixing, for gambling syndicates.
Butt and Asif were charged after allegations about their involvement in spot-fixing appeared in the now-defunct News of the World tabloid, owned by Rupert Murdoch, shortly after the Lord’s Test.
Cooke finished his summing-up of the case on Thursday before sending the jury out to start their deliberations.
Majeed and Aamer face the same charges as Butt and Asif but are not standing trial alongside them.
Published in The Express Tribune, November 1st, 2011.
COMMENTS (7)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
I do not follow this case very much. But I have an issue with the verdict.
It is a common law practice in criminal proceedings that the verdict is unanimous. If the jury cannot reach such a verdict, the judge should declare mistrial and the prosecution must try again.
Settling for majority decision of jury in a criminal proceedings will only open a can of worms. What is that majority. 6 to 5 or 10 to 2? Who is correct in determining what majority is good.
Forget the richer Indian Players(in terms of white money), even James Bond (C Daniel) couldn't afford such a suite. :)
It is not that cold in London ... what are they at?!
10-2. Doesn't look too good for the cricketers?? Jail time maybe reduced but not altogether done away with.
who cares what they are wearing?
Nice suite! I wish them good luck!