Intelligence agencies at PTI rally fight over turnout

Operations Department official says he has to keep count low, as low count will keep the Punjab govt happy.


Asad Kharal/taha Siddiqui October 31, 2011
Intelligence agencies at PTI rally fight over turnout

LAHORE:


For any political gathering to be successful it is not the speech that counts, but rather the strength, which sends out a message to policymakers.


Intelligence and law-enforcement agencies have a whole network of people at every such gathering to ascertain the numbers. What follows is the account of such officials whose names have been withheld at their request.

“I just got a call from the chief, and he asked me to give him my estimates for the number attending the PTI rally,” says an official of the Special Branch. “When I told him it is around 75,000 he told me to go and find a neutral observer,” he adds and laughs, talking to his counterpart in the Punjab Police’s Operations Department.

In response, the Operations Department official says he has to keep the count low, since his department head knows that a low count will keep the Punjab government happy. “But I got a call from the CM Secretariat, and they are now quoting figures of 60,000 themselves,” adds the police official.

The Special Branch had set up a survey van at the back of the stage where Imran Khan spoke. With an elaborate technological system recording every angle of the rally with CCTVs installed all around the location, and even on top of Minar-e-Pakistan, the screens showed a flood of people.

Biggest public gathering?

A senior photographer of an English daily, while sharing his experience with a young journalist, claimed that the PTI rally was the largest public gathering at Minar-e-Pakistan since former prime minister Benazir Bhutto’s arrival in Pakistan in 1986. People belonging to all walks of life – young and old, rich and poor – were seen at the venue, which was at full capacity.

Drone strike’s victims attend

A sizeable number of people came from Khyber-Pakhtukhawa and tribal areas, some of them being direct victims of US drone strikes.

“We have come voluntarily to participate in this meeting because we think Imran Khan has right policies,” PTI president in the Mohmad Agency Sajid Khan told The Express Tribune.

PTI’s tehsil Safi organizer Jam Dad Khan said: “I have lost my two uncles to drone attacks .We are supporting Khan due to his anti-American as well as anti-drone stance.” He added that Imran Khan is gaining popularity in K-P and Fata.

Published in The Express Tribune, October 31st,  2011.

COMMENTS (65)

mansoor | 13 years ago | Reply

@Salahuddin: Very cynical. Every democratic country in the world is run by Establishment to some extent.RAW support Bollywood to make stereotypical exaggerated films about Pakistan Army..Oscar of 2009 was given to the film (The Hurt Locker) in honor of american forces in Iraq we could argue that why didn't they make any film about the Abu Gariab Prison where they humiliated iraqi prisoners. Get real...the corruption is cancer and Imran is focusing on that.

AAmir | 13 years ago | Reply

@Samina Razzaq: totally agree with you the same thing i am asking that in the whole jalsa and in his previous statements he always blamed musharraf and other parties and their supporters for all the current situation in this country, what about Mian Azhar who was one of the right hand of Musharaff and his histroy everyone knows, .what about Hamid Nasir Chatta who was the minister from Q league during Musharaff regime..i can see a different between words and practice..and specially before leaving to China IK told media that if Nawaz Shareef will declare his assets then we can make alliance with him, even after pure personal critics on him during his jalsa at lahore...i think if i will judge him then i will not only judge him on his personality but also with people with whom he is going to make alliance and who will be with him..and this matters alot..

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ