Deciphering the roadmap: US, Pakistan to push for Afghan endgame deal

Secretary Clinton, Gen Dempsey and CIA chief Petraeus to share ‘blueprint’ in Islamabad.

Kamran Yousaf October 19, 2011

ISLAMABAD: In what seems an unprecedented development, Pakistan and the US will push for a ‘deal’ on the Afghan endgame when US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton meets the country’s top civil and military leadership in Islamabad during a two-day trip beginning today (Thursday).

The significance of the visit, official sources say, can be judged from the fact that Secretary Clinton will be accompanied by US Chairman Joint Chiefs of Staff General Martin Dempsey and Central Intelligence Agency Director David Patraeus.

It is a rare instance for the secretary of state, who arrived in Kabul on an unannounced visit on Wednesday, and the US military and intelligence chiefs to undertake a joint trip to Pakistan. “This is the first time that senior US officials are coming to Islamabad together and suffice to say discussions will be on the Afghan endgame,” said a senior security official.

Another official disclosed that Secretary Clinton was arriving in Islamabad to clear up the confusion about her country’s “options and proposals” on Afghanistan. “Frankly, so far the Americans have not shared their roadmap on Afghanistan with us,” the official added. “What confuses us is that we don’t know who is in charge in Afghanistan. Is it the Pentagon or the State Department? This is complicating matters,” he said.

Sensing the importance of the visit, Pakistan’s top civil and military leadership have done their homework and prepared a joint strategy, it is believed. According to the strategy, the contents of which have been shared with The Express Tribune, Pakistan will inform the US that sustainable peace in Afghanistan can only be achieved through a meaningful political reconciliation.

(Read: Afghan war anniversary: 10 years on, the answers are blowing in the wind)

What this means, one official explains, is discussions with insurgent groups. “There is a need to first identify reconcilable groups,” he said. Pakistan might also insist that the US drop preconditions attached to negotiations with the Afghan Taliban. “Afghanistan is a tribal society and they never accept any preconditions and we understand that the US is also now convinced,” the official added.

The strategy also talks of Pakistan’s fears regarding growing Indian influence in Afghanistan. “Pakistan has no issues if the US thinks that by giving India a lead role it will bring sustainable peace in Afghanistan. But obviously that is not the case,” the official pointed out.

(Read: Karzai‘s great gamble)

Another area of concern for Pakistan is the Afghan National Army. Pakistan argues that a 400,000-strong Afghan army will disband into splinter groups when the international forces led by the US pull out of the war-torn country. Based on this assumption, Islamabad believes that the US needs to rethink its strategy.

It is unclear whether the US will endorse Pakistan’s point of view given the differences between the two countries on some strategic issues, such as how to tackle the Haqqani network. The US has so far remained adamant in its demand for a military offensive against the group.

The Pakistan Army has resisted US pressure, though the army chief, General Ashfaq Parvez Kayani, told parliamentarians on Tuesday that if he was convinced that an operation in North Waziristan would bring about peace in Afghanistan, he would do it tomorrow.

Despite differences, experts say the countries have mutual interests. “Pakistan and the US don’t wish to see Afghanistan used against any third country,” said Rustam Shah Mohmand, former ambassador to Afghanistan.

Published in The Express Tribune, October 20th, 2011.

Facebook Conversations

COMMENTS (36)

Observer | 8 years ago | Reply | Recommend

@DILU: Money spent for good causes is never wasted even if alqeda/ bad Taliban come back in power which is what Pakistan wants. India has already won the hearts of real Afghanis and the World with positive actions. Eventually the right will win over the wrong. PAkistan is in the wrong today. The reasoning that these Taliban were oncesupported by US does not rationalize continued support just as Pakistanis' explanation of potential revenge attacks if it goes after Haanis does not take away the fact that this is Pakistanis war and they must pay whatever price for past wrong judgements. US had simply made US ofa willing Pakistan during Soviet war. That is the way international politics works and the fact remains that it was Pakistani's responsibility to make a call not US at that time. Unlike this time, Pakistan had not been armtwisted then.

Dr Kadar Khan FRCS. FACS | 8 years ago | Reply | Recommend *General Ashfaq Parvez Kayani, told parliamentarians on Tuesday that if he was convinced that an operation in North Waziristan would bring about peace in Afghanistan, he would do it tomorrow.* Why was he then said that Pak Army was too stretched for an op in North Waziristan and that we have no time and resources to do it. I think the time has come to confront all these issues head on as the whole world considers us to be duplicitous liars, cheats and what not. Where's our pride?
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ

Load Next Story