At a time when Pakistan’s relations with its ‘strategic ally’ appear to have entered a deep chill, with threats and warnings being hurled with alarming frequency and intensity, Afghanistan and India have concluded a strategic agreement, which can only add to our worries and woes.
The Foreign Office has done the right thing to adopt a detached view, remarking that as sovereign states, India and Afghanistan can do whatever they like. The reality and complexity of international relations, however, do not permit any state the luxury of such philosophical approaches.
In this context, I cannot help but recall the seething anger with which Soviet officials had reacted to Pakistan’s role in bringing together the US and China. Characterising it as a “game changer in global politics”, Soviet officials had warned that it would neither “be forgotten nor forgiven”, a reaction that then appeared highly exaggerated, but the Soviet assessment was correct. As Henry Kissinger has written, “the re-entry of China into the global diplomatic game and the increased strategic options for the United States, gave a new vitality and flexibility to the international system”, while the Chinese leadership described it as an instance of Beijing “utilising contradictions, dividing up enemies, and enhancing ourselves”.
This event, more than anything, galvanised the Soviets to respond to India’s urgings for a formal understanding. Within weeks, the two had entered into the Treaty of Peace, Friendship and Mutual Cooperation, which proved, to our dismay, that while we may not have appreciated the significance of our action, it pushed Moscow inexorably into Delhi’s embrace, providing the latter the carte blanche to do what it had always intended.
The timing of the Indo-Afghan Treaty could not have been worse, with unprecedented pressure being mounted on Pakistan. While much of it may be on account of our mistakes and failures, some of it can also be ascribed to the turf war currently underway between the White House and the American intelligence-military combine. The latter, it is rumoured, does not share Obama’s desire to see an end to American combat troop presence in Afghanistan by 2014. In such a scenario, Washington is likely to find fault with whatever Islamabad does. Are reports of US surreptitiously encouraging Kyrgyzstan to stand in opposition to Pakistan in the forthcoming UN Security Council election, evidence of this attitude?
President Hamid Karzai’s description of Pakistan as “twin brother” notwithstanding this treaty, providing for India’s growing involvement in Afghan security and military matters, will be viewed as evidence of India’s ambitions and therefore a cause for grave misgivings here. Our reaction must nevertheless be measured; this is a time for quiet diplomacy, not for public recriminations. In fact, the need is for identification of its “red lines”, as well as determination of what we may have done to push Karzai into India’s warm embrace, which was being suggested to him for some time. Why should Karzai accuse Pakistan of “pursuing a double game” in his country?
We need also to impress on both Afghanistan and India that any initiative which adds to Pakistan’s concerns, or is aimed at ‘squeezing’ it out of Kabul, would only add to existing tension in the region and further complicate an already messy situation in Afghanistan. Nor should it be in anyone’s interest to smother recent tentative moves in Pakistan to reach out to India.
Incidentally, the Indian prime minister’s promise “to stand by the people of Afghanistan” after withdrawal of foreign forces, brought back echoes of similar assurances given by President Brezhnev and other Soviet leaders to those Moscow had installed in Kabul. History knows of no crueler fate than of those with such soaring ambitions in Afghanistan!
Published in The Express Tribune, October 12th, 2011.
COMMENTS (29)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@Tariq Fatemi
what we may have done to push Karzai into India’s warm embrace,
A. Hosting OBL,Quetta Shura , Haqqani Network perhaps.
B. Rabbani's assassination maybe.
C. Ambitions of strategic depth probably.
History knows of no crueler fate than of those with such soaring ambitions in Afghanistan! Do we count a strong desire to control Afghan territiry for the fabled strategic depth as 'soaring ambition'.
Aamir : It is you , your own worst enemy. It is your attitude which sees enemy everywhere is the problem. It is your attitude which was buggered up by your estd is the enemy, my friend. Look inward and you will solve your problems,
If I got it right, you mean Afghanistan and India should have prior approval from Pakistan before they can choose who should be their friends. Looks like years of cohabitation with US has rubbed off a kind of super power arrogance.
I am confused, who is our enemy now ? India or Afghanistan or America ? or all of them ?!!!
@ashok sai: I don't really agree. While Pakistan may be clearly supporting the Haqqanis & other terror outfits, Taliban certainly is weighing its options if it will favor Pakisstan or not. Remember Pak will be more closer to Haqqanis & ironically, though, Haqqanis are anti US, they do want a major share of the pie to decide Afghanistan's fate which doesn't go down too well with Taliban.
While it is clear that Afghan is being used by all, irony is that Afghan itself has a little say in deciding who needs to make a mutual use of it & how much. The war on terrorism can tangentially take a different shape in the event US decides to make Afghan its ally & start rooting out terror from Pakistan first. Hope that day doesn't come but if it comes, Pakistan will have little to do alternatively. On the other hand, for India, it is very important to have a staretegic alliance with Afghanistan. Everyone who has tried using Afghan has always got a bad deal & hence instead of using it, make it a partner. Pakistan is just doing / trying to do the same what Russia did once - Use Afghanistan. One must remember even Taliban has said that it will consider if needs to go against US or not in the event US goes against Pakistan militarily. China will engulf Pakistan to the extent that Pakistan can only make a foe out it like what it did with US. There is a clear misdirection from Pakistan's stand point on what it really wants to do. Diplomacy is not just about confused / philosiphical statements, it is also about making others think of what your actions are which I don't is the case in Pakistan's policies at all.
@Khalid Masood:
Pakistan is not a failed state, but aspires to be one.
Oops : Pl read the last line in my recent comment as "We are not interested either"
This article would be funny if it was not written with serious intent.
India hasnt' committed to landing to troops in Afghanistan. India hasn't committed Military support to Afghans either.
What India is doing is providing bunch of money and improvement of Afghan infrastructure. Building alternative roads to Sea and to other supply roots. Improving governance capability.
Perhaps India also has a small intelligence outpost in border areas of Afghanistan.
The only reason for Pakistan to worry is because it can't play its 'strategic depth' game with another sovereign country anymore. Pakistan somehow assumes Afghanistan is its property and it has the right to rule it by proxy.
People keep saying Afghanistan is graveyard of empires. It's been a graveyard for Pakistan too. above 30,000 Pakistanis have died because of Policies of Pakistan.
Only when the Pakistan Army gets over it's India-centric philosphy and abandons the dream of strategic depth, will we see some peace & progress in the region. The problem is not Al Qaida,TTP,the Taliban or even Kashmir, but Indo-Pak relations & how we view each other.
@Khalid Masood: Everyone in Pakistan is an armchair general. Pakistanis have been dreaming about India's defeat / collapse / defeat / ruin / defeat / break-up / defeat / ... since the partition. Not sure what's in the Pakistani air, but whatever it is that you smoke causes you to call out "Crush India" and these days "Crush USA" every few years. You only have to see the current state and size of Pakistan compared to the hopes at Independence 64 years ago to realize how much damage such irrational day-dreams have done to the country. Well, enjoy your day-dreams -- there's not much else to cheer about in Pakistan during the long load-shedding hours -- so I wish you good luck with them...
This whole "graveyard of superpowers" thing is a joke, Afghanistan is a relatively new country, it was created by the Durrani Empire in mid 18th century, before that Afghanistan was mostly under the authority of non-Afghans...like Mughals, Turks, Indians, Persians, Arabs, Mongols etc...even Sikhs took some of Afghan territory in pre-modern era conflicts, like KP & FATA, which were later consolidated by Britishers....and btw Afghanistan did not beat USSR in 80's on its own, it was backed by more than 200 countries, including US, western Europe, Israel, China, Arab & other muslim regions etc.
Indian Army men are not on the soil of Afghanistan so far but hundreds of RAW spies and agents are operating there. I know some Indian Para Military Units are there in Afghanistan to protect road building teams and other Indians working at many places.
Indian is not superpower but aspires to be a superpower................ PANCHOON SAWAR DEHLI SAY AAYE............:)
@Khalid Masood who says "India – Welcome to Afghanistan…………the graveyard of superpowers…….Now it the turn of Indian to get and and get ruined"
So, you agree that India is a Superpower. That's funny.
@Khalid Masood: "India – Welcome to Afghanistan…………the graveyard of superpowers"
The superpowers were occupiers. India is there at the Afghan request and helping them build roads and schools. Despite repated requests from NATO, India has refused to commit its troops to Afghabistan for fighting. The only role it is willing to play is train the Afghan military.
So given that it is not doing ANYTHING against Afghan interests, your wishful thinking is likely temain exactly that - wishful.
"History knows of no crueler fate than of those with such soaring ambitions in Afghanistan"
How true! And how short our memories! Pakistan had such soaring ambitions in Afghanistan at one time that the Pak generals used to refer to Afghanistan as just another province of Pakistan !
The indians are in it for the mineral resources and infrastructure projects I.e to make money ..
@Sal: what does it say about the state of Pakistan that Indian training for Afghan security forces, will cause havoc for Pak in KP and Balochistan and cause Pak to break up. If Pakistan is really such a fragile state, then it doesn't deserve to be a nation.
Fortunately, your argument is all wrong - the only thing that Indian training for Afghan security forces does is to strengthen Afghans so that they can fight and defeat the terrorist Taliban who have destroyed Aghanistan. If Pakistan is bothered by this, then it is obviously not a friend to the Afghans. Pakistanis need to let go of their recidivist mindset of treating Afghanistan as their client state.
what is use to moaning over the tardy steps taking by in seated government....write down solutions ...war?a shuman type of bold declaration??or making Afghanistan a client state??just like Pakistan to America ???military or diplomatic tools??when how and where???uni lateral or multi lateral....
Stop acting ignorant all of you. Everybody knows India is hell bent to divide Pakistan. Even in the 1970s India did it. They already are creating mess in balochistan. They r already training the afghans and the northern alliance. The problem is they will then have access to khyber pakhtunkhuwa and balochistan and create havoc and nationalist agenda there to separate khyber and join it with Afghanistan. the US also creates havoc in it's enemy states eventhough it's a superpower. Why wouldn't India do the same when it's also becoming an economic power?
India should worry about none and continue to confine itself to Development Aid and building infrastructure that will benefit Afghans and impact them positively. Once jobs are generated for local people they will seek the benefits of education for their children. It is the Taliban who stand to lose lose in such a situation. If Pakistan allies itself with a much reviled Taliban rather than a large Investor like India it will be disastrous. India will be seen on the World stage as investing resources to benefit Afghan people while Pakistan will be seen as a spoiler and an spokesperson for terrorists. Common sense not EGO can convert it into an opportunity that is a win win for all.
History knows of no crueler fate than of those with such soaring ambitions in Afghanistan! Indians will do well to remember the lessons of history and avoid treading the Afghan quicksands. They should stick to humanitarian and development aid,
USSR collapsed before the Communist regime in Kabul. NATO, US, Iran, India, Russia and Central Asian won’t allow Taliban a free hand in Afghanistan. At least the Northern half of Afghanistan will remain independent of Pakistan’s influence.
India. India. India! We can't let go of our obsession and paranoia. Let Afghans choose their friends. We have much too much to offer that Indians can't. Advantage of Geography, history, ports, shared culture etc. Afghans will sit down with us, if we give up our strategic depth and assets that only seek to control them. Do we want to be dominated and treated as somebody's backyard?
Pakistan is making a mountain from a mole. Not even a single army man from India will land in Afghan.Pakistan can be very assured of it.
India - Welcome to Afghanistan............the graveyard of superpowers.......Now it the turn of Indian to get and and get ruined............
Pakistanis to sit back and watch the show..........