However, that point aside, the fact remains that the conduct and actions of those elected to public office should be open to comment and criticism from society in general and the media in particular. In fact, if the latter weren’t holding public officials and functionaries accountable for their actions through this kind of feedback, it would be failing in its job of being a monitor and watchdog of the various pillars of the state. Also, it has to be pointed out that in the world of media and public relations, especially in this day and age, there really is no such thing as bad publicity. And even if an individual, who is in the public sphere, is made the subject of a satirical skit on a popular television show, then that amounts to publicity. Of course, such satire should be within the bounds of reason and good sense and should not make personal attacks on the said individual or malign or slander him. The problem in Pakistan is that the Pemra’s own guidelines on this are too vague and wide in scope, and in effect allow the state to include just about any kind of programming into the ambit of what’s not kosher.
Published in The Express Tribune, September 28th, 2011.
COMMENTS (4)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
Satire with in limits is ok but some of our channels exceed all the limits of decency any one who can abuse government he is considered good anchor freedom requires greater sense of responsibility unfortunately that is missing Pemra should have thought it earlier