Suo motu hearing: Court criticises Mastung attack report

Balochistan home department’s report has no statements from the survivors.


Shezad Baloch September 27, 2011

QUETTA:


The Balochistan High Court criticised the provincial home department’s report on the sectarian attack in Mastung and said the Balochistan government is pushing the province towards destruction and should “clarify its policy”.


On September 19, 26 Shia pilgrims on their way to Iran were disembarked from a passenger bus and shot by a group of armed men in Mastung.  Banned militant outfit Lashkar-e-Jhangvi claimed responsibility for the attack.

The division bench comprised Chief Justice Qazi Faez Isa and Justice Hashim Khan Kakar. The Advocate General of Balochistan Amanullah Kanrani appeared before the bench and submitted a report on the attack on behalf of the Balochistan government.

The provincial home department in its report said security has been increased on highways to protect pilgrims. “Pilgrims will not be allowed to travel to Iran without obtaining a no-objection certificate, the report said, adding “The Hazara community will be provided adequate security if they inform the home department about their journey to Iran or any other area of Balochistan.”

The committee recorded the statements of three people, including the driver and cleaners. However, there were no statements from any of the survivors. The chief justice asked why none of the survivors had been spoken to.

When the court was told that the case had been handed over to the Crime Investigation Department, the chief justice asked why the Levies were in control of Mastung when they couldn’t investigate the case.  “It is not the investigators’ fault, but that of the provincial government. The provincial government is pushing Balochistan towards destruction and it should clarify its policy,” the chief justice said.

Earlier, the Supreme Court Bar Association President Asma Jahangir had said that high courts cannot take suo motu note of incidents like Mastung killings. Responding to this, the bench issued notices to Jahangir and the attorney general and asked for comments from the Balochistan bar and high court bar associations over her statement.

The court approved the request of Hazara Democratic Party to become a party in the case. The hearing was adjourned till October 4.

Published in The Express Tribune, September 27th,  2011.

COMMENTS (2)

Fouran | 12 years ago | Reply Really shocked!!! Citizens should obtain NOC for traveling in side the province in which they live.
Aftab | 12 years ago | Reply

The esteemed court may not allow imposition of obtaining NOC for pilgrims visiting Iran. Everyone knows the sarkari procedure of how difficult it is to obtain an NOC, the bribery involved in it and unnecessary questioning by Home Department. Even if NOC for visit is made mandatory, the procedure should be very clear, duly announced in leading newspapers in order to avoid misery to citizens of Pakistan.

The court must ask the provincial government to eradicate the lawless elements instead of pretending to provide security. A peaceful and safe Balochistan is for the interest of all inhabitants of this province.

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ