Kishanganga Dam: Court of Arbitration ruling favours Pakistan, says minister

Naveed Qamar says the Indian media is downplaying the significance of the interim order.


Express September 26, 2011

ISLAMABAD:


As confusion reigned over the interpretation of an international tribunal’s ruling on the Kishanganga Dam being built on the Indian side of the Line of Control, Water and Power Minister Naveed Qamar tried to portray the decision as “a victory for Pakistan”.


Referring to the diametrically opposing interpretations of the ruling on Saturday by the Netherlands-based Court of Arbitration being run in Indian and Pakistani newspapers, Qamar asked the Pakistani media to ignore the Indian newspapers’ view on the matter, as they have been trying to downplay the significance of the decision.

In an address to workers of the Islamabad Electric Supply Company (Iesco), Qamar reiterated Islamabad’s stance that the Court of Arbitration’s order meant that India had to stop construction on the project. In a press release on Saturday evening, the government had said that the court’s ruling meant that any Indian construction activities now would be “at their own risk”.

“We believe that interim order points out that CoA has advised India to stop work on the dam till the final decision,” he said. “After the detailed decision is delivered, we will examine it with our legal team.”

“India will have to demolish the dam structure if the final verdict denied Indian right of waters on River Neelum,” he added.

Power tariff hikes

The minister also appeared to be preparing the public for a move towards a more market-oriented system of determining prices for electricity in the country, pointing out that the government had no control over international commodity prices such as oil, which are frequently the single biggest cause of tariff increases.

“We have no control over increase in power tariff on account of fuel adjustment,” said the minister.

Qamar was referring to a recommendation by a special cabinet committee on energy – of which he is a member – to raise power tariffs across the country by an average of 12% over the current fiscal year. “However, no final decision has been taken on gradual increase in power tariff,” he said.

Among other recommendations of the committee include a proposal to reform the power sector, by making the state-owned power distribution companies more professional and better-managed.

Qamar said that the Pakistan Electric Power Company (Pepco) – the firm created by the government to manage the finances of the power sector – would be dissolved by October 30 as part of the reform process.

Diamer-Bhasha Dam

Qamar also denied that the United States had refused to finance part of the construction of the Diamer-Bhasha Dam, despite news in recent days that the Washington had ruled out all financial assistance to Islamabad until the government takes action against militants based in North Waziristan.

“The matter was taken up at the recent Pak-US energy dialogue where US representatives informed us that they will take up the issue of funding before the Congress for decision,” he said, adding that the US has already disbursed funds under the Kerry-Lugar Act for Pakistan’s power sector.

Published in The Express Tribune, September 27th, 2011.

COMMENTS (2)

Santosh | 12 years ago | Reply Naveed Qamar's statement is misleading. The court limited itself to saying that India should not undertake any actions that cannot later be undone, depending on how the court rules. Mr. Qamar is asserting that this means that “We believe that interim order points out that CoA has advised India to stop work on the dam till the final decision,”... This is a leap of logic pattern all too familiar in Pak - witness, notions of strategic depth and the infamous "defence of East Pakistan lies in the West". I am astounded as to how Pak leadership can get away with such outrageous statements. But what's truly disappointing is the lack of media oversight into holding Paki ministers and generals accountable for their words and action. This instance will not matter in the long-term since the court will rule next year one way or another. But, Paki media turning a blind eye to such intellectual fudging is a dangerous trend, and one of the primary reasons for Pak suffering.
John B | 12 years ago | Reply The Hindu in India does not jeopardize its journalistic reputation it has earned over hundred years. PAK politicians should stop raising the expectations of the ill informed locals and say the truth when chance occurs. Demolish the dam in Indian side, if ruling goes in favor of PAK? Such crazy talks should be avoided. As long as India guarantees and proves scientifically the spill over and its out flow water volume are nearly similar and it is for non consumptive use, the arbitration will be in India's favor. The issue at arbitration is the change in engineering plan at the base of the dam due to silt accumulation which the PAK argued and lost in Paris. If the outflow water volume is lower than what is promised in Indus water treaty, then India has to compensate to PAK, and that will be the outcome. This is not a new issue. From Niagara electricity project to Aswan dam the clause exists.
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ