JUI-F steps back as tensions rise in Balochistan
Party withdraws from government engagements over policy disputes

A political rift is deepening in Quetta as JUI-F has withdrawn from all provincial government engagements, escalating tensions with the Balochistan administration.
The party has decided not to attend official meetings, including visits to the Chief Minister's House, signaling a sharp deterioration in its relationship with the ruling setup.
Addressing reporters, provincial leader Maulana Abdul Wasey, accompanied by Senator Kamran Murtaza, said the party would keep its distance from government activities for the time being. He indicated that the decision reflects serious concerns within the party over recent policy moves and what it views as a lack of consultation on sensitive matters.
The dispute largely revolves around the issue of madrassa registration. JUI-F leaders argue that any attempt to regulate religious seminaries without clear legal safeguards is unacceptable. Wasey described the matter as a core concern for the party and accused the authorities of overstepping boundaries, warning that continued pressure could trigger a strong reaction.
The party has also called on CM Mir Sarfraz Bugti to issue a formal apology, setting a deadline for early next month. According to the leadership, failure to do so may lead to a wider response, including public demonstrations across the province.
An important meeting of the party is scheduled on the May 2, where leaders are expected to decide their future course of action. Discussions are likely to include potential protest plans not only over madrassa-related measures but also over proposed legislation concerning mines and minerals.
With both sides holding firm positions, the political atmosphere in the province is growing increasingly tense, and the coming days are likely to play a decisive role in shaping whether the situation moves toward dialogue or further confrontation.


















COMMENTS
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ