School textbook distribution yet to be completed
Govt grants additional time weeks into academic year

The distribution of free textbooks at the beginning of the academic year has been delayed despite the classes having begun in schools across Punjab earlier this month.
Parents and students have been left scrambling with many forced to turn to the markets, where book prices have increased, placing financial pressure on already strained households.
Officials had initially expressed confidence that all students would receive free textbooks within the first two weeks of the academic session. However, according to several school officials, deliveries remain incomplete.
In several institutions, students are attending classes without essential course materials, relying instead on shared or outdated books.
The shortage has triggered a surge in demand in local book markets where prices have reportedly risen significantly.
Sellers attribute the increase to supply constraints and rising printing costs.
Parents on the other hand see it as exploitation during a time of need. Many complain that the absence of price regulation has allowed sellers to charge arbitrary rates.
Educationists warn that such disruptions at the start of the academic year can have long-term consequences.
"The first few weeks are critical for building learning momentum. When students lack textbooks, it creates gaps that are difficult to recover later," said an academic based in Lahore.
He added that the situation disproportionately affects students from low-income families who depend entirely on government support.
Adding to the complexity, authorities have extended the deadline for textbook provision. Sources indicate that the Punjab Curriculum and Textbook Board has been given additional time until late April to complete the distribution. However, critics argue that such extensions only highlight systemic inefficiencies rather than offering real solutions.



















COMMENTS
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ