23 terrorists killed in Lower Dir

Twenty-three terrorists were killed in clashes with the security forces in Lower Dir.

Afp July 06, 2010

LOWER DIR: Security forces killed at least 23 militants in an exchange of fire during a search operation in the country's troubled northwest, officials said on Tuesday.

The clash took place in remote Kilpani village of Lower Dir, the district where four bombers armed with car bombs and rockets attacked a paramilitary checkpoint killing one soldier early on Sunday.

A senior military official told AFP that police, paramilitary and army were carrying out a joint search in the village when a group of about 50 insurgents opened fire on them, triggering a gunbattle.

"Security personnel killed 23 militants and destroyed three of their hideouts in the village," he added. A senior police official in the area, Khan Razzaq, confirmed the incident and said that militants had managed to escape under the cover of darkness.

Security forces waged a major offensive against the Taliban in Lower Dir and the neighbouring Swat valley last year but says the region was back under control.

Security forces have fought against the Taliban in the lawless tribal belt on the Afghan border and parts of the northwest for years, but deadly clashes break out on largely a daily basis.


Ibrar Khan | 11 years ago | Reply It is difficult to completely wash out the militants from such remote areas. Cause these hides are situated on the Pak-Afghan border and the local people support and help the Taliban. Now that the government is laden with a few positive steps people are disgusted with the Taliban gradually. If the govt keep continue the development,it is impossible for militant to instal there feet again here.
Zainab Ali | 11 years ago | Reply It is important to limit the terrorists in a small area, so that they are not able to leave their hideouts and thus a final operation would wipe out the remains that are left to haunt us.
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ


Most Read