Jake Paul criticises Billie Eilish over law enforcement comments amid ICE debate
Jake Paul drew attention after posting comments about ICE and law enforcement following Billie Eilish’s Grammy speech

Jake Paul has sparked online discussion after sharing a series of posts about law enforcement and immigration enforcement that directly referenced comments made by Billie Eilish at the 2026 Grammy Awards.
On Saturday night, the 29-year-old boxer and influencer posted on X that people who criticise Immigration and Customs Enforcement should not rely on emergency services. “If you don’t like ICE then you can’t call 911 when you’re in trouble,” Paul wrote. “If you don’t respect law enforcement agents then you shouldn’t depend on them.”
He later directed a post at Eilish, referring to her as “Billie Eyelash” and writing, “When Billie Eyelash gets her home broken into it’s not gonna be f-ck ICE I can promise you that.” The posts received thousands of comments and millions of views within hours.
Paul’s comments followed Eilish’s acceptance speech at the Grammy Awards on February 1, where she said, “No one is illegal on stolen land,” before ending with the words, “F-ck ICE.”
Eilish and her brother Finneas also wore “ICE Out” pins on the red carpet. Other artists, including Bad Bunny and Kehlani, used the same phrase during their speeches.
Paul, a visible supporter of President Donald Trump, was photographed later that day at the Winter Olympics in Milan sitting next to Vice President JD Vance while watching the United States women’s hockey team compete. His fiancée, Dutch speedskater Jutta Leerdam, is competing at the Milano Cortina Games.
Online responses to Paul’s posts also referenced his own past interactions with law enforcement, including a 2020 incident in Arizona where he was charged with criminal trespass and unlawful assembly during protests against police brutality. Those charges were later dismissed.


















COMMENTS
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ