India withdraws from Oxford Union debate, Pakistan awarded points by default

Indian speakers withdrew without offering any substantive explanation, says the Pakistan High Commission in London

The Indian delegation withdrew from a scheduled Oxford Union debate on India's Pakistan policy, resulting in the Pakistani delegation uncontested and effectively receiving the points by default, the Pakistan High Commission in London confirmed.

The High Commission noted that India attempted to replace its accredited speakers with lesser-known alternatives, which were not deemed sufficient to continue the debate under the agreed terms. 

It also highlighted that several Indian media analysts, who frequently comment on Pakistan, were absent. The withdrawal continues a series of diplomatic and academic non-participation instances by India since May 2025.

Key Indian speakers, including General MM Narwa, Dr Subramaniam Swamy, and Sachin Pilot, pulled out at the last minute. The Pakistani delegation, which included General (R) Zubair Mahmood Hayat, former foreign minister Hina Rabbani Khar, and Dr Muhammad Faisal, was present and fully prepared for the debate.

According to the Pakistan High Commission, all three Indian speakers withdrew Thursday morning without offering “any substantive explanation” for their inability to attend a debate.

Indian Delegation Backs Out Of Oxford Union Debate At Last Minute, Hands Walkover to Pakistani side

The Pakistan High Commission in London @PakistaninUK regrets to announce that the Indian delegation scheduled to participate in a high profile debate at the Oxford Union…

— Pakistan High Commission London (@PakistaninUK) November 27, 2025

The High Commission noted that the Pakistani delegation had already arrived in London and was preparing to travel to Oxford. It described the withdrawal as “a considerable embarrassment” for the Oxford Union and a missed opportunity for its members to hear a “structured, fact-based exchange on a critical regional issue.”

The statement highlighted that Indian members of the Oxford Union “significantly outnumber” Pakistani members, and even in a “friendly environment,” the Indian delegation “chose not to submit its policies to open scrutiny and a student vote.”

The High Commission said the decision reflected “a lack of confidence on the part of the Indian delegation in defending India’s Pakistan policy in an open, rules-based forum.” It added that while Indian officials often deliver “aggressive rhetoric through partisan media platforms,” their representatives were “unwilling to test those claims in a neutral and intellectually rigorous debate.”

Pakistan, it stated, “remains committed to reasoned dialogue, responsible statecraft, and peaceful dispute resolution,” and its speakers were prepared to argue their case “on the strength of facts, international law, and regional stability considerations.” The Pakistan High Commission also expressed appreciation for the Union’s efforts and confirmed its readiness to participate in future events promoting “informed, respectful, and substantive dialogue on South Asian peace and security.”

The Oxford Union has not yet commented on the withdrawal beyond informing organisers of the Indian delegation’s decision.