How many more massacres?

Pakistan is struck with amnesia about the Hazaras every time a massacre takes place, this one will be forgotten too.


Editorial September 21, 2011

The massacre on September 20 of a bus full of Hazara Shia near Quetta is another grotesque reminder of the slow, but steady, erosion of the religious state in Pakistan. It is not only the Quetta Shia who are the permanent target of terrorists. The Turi community — formed through historical migration from Afghanistan to Kurram Agency in the Tribal Areas — tells the same tragic story of Pakistan’s abandonment of its afflicted communities. The main road that links the agency’s headquarters Parachinar with Peshawar and the rest of the country has been more or less closed since 2007 because of the Taliban and their allied militants in the area. Unfortunately, the government has not able to keep it open for more than a few days, despite a much-heralded agreement earlier this year between the various tribes of Kurram. As for the September 20 massacre, the Lashkar-e-Jhangvi, whose leader Malik Ishaq was recently released from a jail in Punjab, claimed the attack, which resulted in the cold-blooded execution-style killing of 29 Shia pilgrims on their way to Iran.

Pakistan is struck with amnesia about the Hazaras every time a massacre takes place. The one on the last Eidul Fitr was forgotten; this one will be forgotten too. In the last three years, 230 of them have lost their lives as citizens of Pakistan. When Pakistan was supporting the Taliban regime in Afghanistan starting 1996, it began offering the sacrifice of its citizens to Mullah Umar and his renegade state as proof of its loyalty. And the killings didn’t begin in the 1990s but much before, around the time of General Zia’s Islamisation when the s0-called jihad against the Soviet Union was in full swing. The state tolerated the killing of the Shia by the Taliban in Mazar-e-Sharif, and did nothing when the Taliban regime that it supported in Kabul went after the Hazara in their heartland of Bamyan. In 2001, following America’s invasion of Afghanistan, al Qaeda fighters escaped to Pakistan and found shelter here, thanks in part to a network of sympathisers. When this happened, many of the homegrown sectarian killers found a readymade host in al Qaeda with its virulently anti-Shia ideology. In 2003, when the Shia were massacred during Ashura in Quetta, the local Shia leaders showed pamphlets issued by all major madrassas of Pakistan which had declared their sect as heretical.

The main sectarian organisation called Sipah Sahaba circumvented the ban placed on it by splitting into several smaller parts, and as it did this, the state did nothing. One splinter was the Lashkar-e-Jhangvi and the other was the Jaish-e-Muhammad. The first has joined al Qaeda as a member of Brigade 313 where Tehreek-i-Taliban and Jundullah are featured together with members of al Qaeda. The Lashkar and Jaish are both products of south Punjab, based in Bahawalpur and Rahimyar Khan respectively with links to the madrassa network headed by a well-known seminary in Karachi.

Pakistan’s turning away from the international community, as symbolised by its pulling out of the IMF programme and its escalating estrangement from America, could well place it in a completely isolationist corner. In fact, if that were to happen, it will only further encourage the forces of obscurantism and extremism, which have already made their significant presence felt across the length and breadth of Pakistani society. In this context, the assassination in Kabul through suicide bombing of the leader of the Tajik community in that country, Burhanuddin Rabbani, also on September 20, could further push Pakistan into this isolationist corner, not least because the rest of the world assumes, rightly or wrongly, that most Taliban attacks inside Afghanistan originate from Pakistan. Those who think that terrorism started in 2001 because Pakistan joined America’s war on terror, should know that attacks on Shias have been happening since the 1980s and since that period non-state actors have been involved in them, and that most of these have links to the Taliban and al Qaeda of today. The question to ask is: how many more massacres are we going to see of the Shias before we wake up and decide to purge the monster of sectarianism from within us?

Published in The Express Tribune, September 22nd,  2011.

COMMENTS (13)

Ghulam Hussain | 9 years ago | Reply

In Pakistan all the people belonging to different school of thought. but banned organizations killing the innocent people for trying to speared anarchy and destabilizing the brotherhood atmosphere between the citizen of Quetta city. Our nation's killing reason is a we are educated defender of our religion, nation, country. we are the follower of Imam Hussain a.s. and we are patriot and loyal with our country cause. The terrorists are the enemy of state and people they have no religion and humanity and they have no arguments no rule of law or justice, we can see their nasty brutal killing activities killings the innocent women and children in all PAKISTAN they wana rule on people with just bullet and suicide jackets. they killed about 600 innocent Hazaras Shia just in Quetta. The Government have implemented ban on all such organizations which are anti state and humanity. The IHRC, human right activists should be aware and take serious notice on the killing on innocent citizens. The innocent people need your attention and favour to stop this brutehood nonstop act. May Allah rest their soul with peace all shohada in janah. (Amin ya Rabulallameen) Pakistan Zindabad Terrorists Murdabad.

abifka | 9 years ago | Reply

@gulbadsha: Because it is a judiciary with no shame, no guts or simply no fear of God !!! Supreme court frees ppl like Mukhtaran Mai case's culprits and Malik Ishaq to go out and carry out his vow that he took saying he will do it again ( kill shias again ) as his fath calls him for this obligatory duty.

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ