Humanity on the line: true cost of a third world war

Unlike the first two world wars, a third global conflict would almost certainly involve nuclear weapons


Noman Ali Riaz June 02, 2025
The writer takes interest in history, international relations, philosophy and statecraft

print-news
Listen to article

In a world increasingly fraught with political tension, economic instability and military rivalries, the idea of a third world war is no longer a distant nightmare — it is a looming possibility. The modern era, marked by advanced technology and global interdependence, should be an age of peace and progress. Yet, growing nationalism, arms races and diplomatic failures have pushed humanity to the brink. Unlike the past, a future conflict of this scale would not just reshape borders, it could threaten the very survival of civilisation.

Unlike the first two world wars, a third global conflict would almost certainly involve nuclear weapons. With over 13,000 nuclear warheads stockpiled around the world, a single miscalculation or escalation could unleash unimaginable devastation. Entire cities could be wiped off the map in seconds, and millions would perish in the blink of an eye.

Beyond the immediate destruction, radioactive fallout would poison the environment for decades. Survivors would suffer from radiation sickness, cancers, and genetic disorders. The potential for a “nuclear winter,” in which smoke and ash block sunlight and cause global temperatures to plummet, could destroy agriculture and lead to mass starvation — spelling the collapse of organised human life.

Economic collapse

Today’s world economy is deeply interconnected. A global conflict involving major powers would cause instant disruption. Stock markets would crash, trade routes would be blocked, and global supply chains would disintegrate. Millions would lose their jobs, and banking systems could collapse. Essential commodities like food, fuel, and medicine would become scarce, and inflation would spiral out of control. The economic damage would take generations to recover — if at all.

Humanitarian disaster

World War III would trigger the largest humanitarian crisis in human history. Entire populations would be displaced as cities become battlegrounds and entire regions descend into chaos. Refugee numbers would soar into the hundreds of millions, overwhelming any existing support systems.

With infrastructure destroyed and governments unable to function, humanitarian organisations would struggle to respond. The world would witness a level of human suffering unprecedented in modern times.

Environmental devastation

The environmental cost of modern warfare is as terrifying as its human toll. The use of nuclear, chemical and biological weapons would render vast areas uninhabitable. Forests would burn, oceans would be poisoned and farmland would be contaminated beyond use.

The war effort would produce enormous GHG emissions, accelerating climate change. Ecosystems would collapse and countless species would be driven to extinction. The environmental wounds inflicted could take centuries — or longer — to heal.

Collapse of global order

World War III could dismantle the global institutions humanity has built to maintain peace, health and development. Organisations like the UN, WHO and ICC could become powerless or cease to exist altogether. In their absence, lawlessness, human rights abuses and authoritarianism could rise unchecked, and the foundations of international cooperation could crumble. The global community would revert to a state of disorder and chaos.

Cultural and psychological trauma

Beyond physical and institutional destruction lies the hidden cost of war: psychological trauma and cultural loss. Entire generations could grow up in a world defined by fear, grief and violence.

Libraries, museums, places of worship and cultural heritage sites could be destroyed. Artistic expression and freedom of thought would suffer under wartime repression. Humanity would not only lose lives, it would lose its identity.

A final thought

World War III is not a distant threat to be ignored — it is a harsh warning. Humanity stands at a crossroads: one path leads to mutual understanding, diplomacy and survival; the other, to devastation and extinction.

It is our collective responsibility — as global citizens, leaders and communities — to choose peace over war, diplomacy over aggression, and cooperation over division.

Once a World War III begins, there may be no world left to save.

COMMENTS

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ