Data analyst examining Johnny Depp's bot campaign claims 80% of pro-Baldoni tweets are 'inorganic'

Most pro-Baldoni tweets in the Blake Lively case are fake or coordinated, analyst says, echoing Depp trial patterns.


Pop Culture & Art May 07, 2025
Photo: Sony Pictures/Reuters

The data analyst who uncovered bot-driven online support in the Johnny Depp v Amber Heard trial has found similar patterns in the legal battle between Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni.

Zhouhan Chen, founder of Information Tracer, reports to The Guardian that more than 80% of pro-Baldoni tweets show signs of inorganic activity.

Chen reviewed the top 500 posts related to the ongoing Lively-Baldoni lawsuit and identified suspicious patterns including newly created accounts, repetitive posting, and single-topic behaviour. The tweets promote hashtags like #JusticeForJustinBaldoni and #BlakeLivelyIsALiar, and echo the coordinated content seen during the Depp-Heard trial in 2022.

Lively has accused Baldoni of sexual harassment on the set of It Ends With Us. Baldoni, who also directed and co-produced the film, has denied the claims and launched multiple countersuits. The legal battle includes allegations of reputational damage, PR manipulation, and defamation, with trial proceedings scheduled for March 2026.

Court filings from Lively’s legal team include text messages from Baldoni’s representatives that suggest an effort to shape online sentiment. In one message, PR adviser Melissa Nathan tells Baldoni’s publicist, Jennifer Abel, “You know we can bury anyone.” Baldoni’s legal team argues these messages are presented without full context and misrepresent their intent.

Chen’s latest analysis mirrors what he discovered during the Depp-Heard case, where bot activity and coordinated campaigns were found to have influenced public opinion online. He warns that such tactics are becoming common in high-profile disputes.

The Lively-Baldoni case has also drawn attention from conservative commentators, who have used it to reinforce cultural narratives about gender and media bias. Experts say this fusion of politics and celebrity trials creates an environment where misinformation can spread quickly.

COMMENTS (1)

Don | 3 weeks ago | Reply It would be both legal suicide and malpractice for Baldoni s team to engage in this social media campaign currently. It would be retaliation and they would definitely be liable under California law prevailing party gets legal fees and treble damages . It is possible they engaged in this practice in August but that would have affected the movie s premier and box office receipts. It could have also jeopardized Baldoni s career as a director if that movie tanked. There is a simpler explanation. People that don t normally follow Hollywood news are following this case. I think it is because it is a David vs Goliath case where you have a powerful couple using all their Hollywood and media connections to destroy a man and his company. Also virtually all of the claims in Lively s lawsuit are contradicted by actual receipts. People like me are for that reason are heavily invested in this case. I hardly ever post to entertainment publications. Now I do which would explain the new accounts. Every time I sign in with google of facebook to post a comment that is registered as a new account and since December I have posted to a lot of different publications. I have done it because I feel that Baldoni was grossly mistreated by the Reynolds by Hollywood and especially by the main stream media who were very remiss in their duties as journalists to report on matters objectively. As far as politics I am an independent and have no political affiliation.
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ