Brisbane to build main stadium on parkland

The new stadium will have a 60,000 capacity


AFP March 26, 2025

print-news
SYDNEY:

A new 60,000-seat stadium and a national aquatics centre will be built in an inner city Brisbane park for the 2032 Olympics, Queensland State Premier David Crisafulli announced on Tuesday as he unveiled the third venue plan for the Games.

Crisafulli said another 20,000-seat boutique stadium would be constructed at Brisbane Showgrounds, while some events have been moved out of the city to regional Queensland.

Brisbane's Queensland Tennis Centre will be upgraded with the addition of a new 3,000-seat showcourt, while the Gabba ground will host cricket at the Games before being torn down.

The issue of venues has been a matter of much political conflict since the Games were awarded to Brisbane in 2021 and Crisafulli said organisers could now get started on constructing and refurbishing the various arenas.

"Finally, Queensland has a plan," Crisafulli said in Brisbane. "The time has come to just get on with it. We will."

A A$2.5 billion ($1.57 billion) indoor arena and entertainment venue which was to have been paid for by the federal government will now be put out to private tender with the promised funds going to other infrastructure.

Crisafulli is likely to come under fire for the stadium plan as he went on the record opposing the construction of a new arena in the city in the run-up to the state elections that brought him to power last November.

"It's my decision," he added. "I wasn't prepared to take the politically easy option when the truth is that wouldn't be of benefit to the state.

"I believe in this plan and I think Queensland is going to back it."

Environmental lobby group Save Victoria Park picketed outside Crisafulli's announcement on Tuesday and issued an open letter last week saying any construction in the park for the Olympics would be an embarrassment for Brisbane.

COMMENTS

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ