What is quickly obvious too is that Bangladesh is so overwhelmingly, Bengali. Perhaps my surprise is a function of the fact that the flight from predominantly Punjabi-speaking Delhi is the same distance to Dhaka — two and a half hours — as it is from Kannada-speaking Bangalore or Tamil-speaking Chennai or the Bollywood Hindi that you can’t escape in Mumbai.
Perhaps I expected more shalwar-kameezes on the women — after all, even diehard Malayali women are abandoning their stunning gold-bordered mundu-veshtis or half sarees and getting into badly-tailored Punjabi suits.
Perhaps I expected much more Hindi so as to be able to converse with taxi drivers, just as every self-respecting journalist who parachutes into a foreign country does and figures out everything on the long ride into the hotel. Later, a Bangladeshi journalist friend would remind me each time I broke into a Hindi sentence, that he did not understand Urdu and had refused to learn it.
Of course he belonged to a family of muktijoddhas, or freedom fighters, one among millions who fought the war of liberation against Pakistan, with India’s help, and created the new nation in 1971. I tried to convince this friend that learning a new language never hurt anybody that, in fact, it was a window into the soul of another culture, but he wasn’t listening.
How could he, he said, the wounds were still too raw. His elder brother had been maimed and then killed and those memories of war were imprinted in his brain. What hadn’t helped was that for years after Mujibur Rahman’s assassination on August 15, 1975 — at least the killers had a sense of history, my Bangladeshi journalist friend said, smilingly — Bangladesh had been ruled by Khaleda Zia’s Bangladesh National Party (BNP), a party that had been born in the cantonment, and which, with the help of the Jamiat-i-Islami, had sought to subvert the nation’s secular creed.
I asked Shahriar Kabir, one of Bangladesh’s best known historians and film-makers, who walks with a limp because he was beaten up in jail by Zia’s goons, whether reconciliation was possible between the Awami League and the BNP. “Only if the BNP gives up the Jamiat,” he said, adding, “don’t forget that unlike India, which won its freedom from the British because your freedom movement was bi-partisan, our liberation was a civil war”. Another friend, Captain Shahab, who has scoured the countryside writing on the aftermath of the 1971 war, says Dhaka has now requested Delhi to send back the graves of all those freedom fighters who laid down their lives for the motherland, in India.
That’s the thing that strikes you between the eyes, when in Bangladesh: history is not something that you read in the books, but a living thing that constantly whispers in your ear, participates in your conversations and interferes in your dreams.
Professor Maimoon, a third friend, tells me that Bangladesh is now compiling a list of all those who helped fight the war in 1971, a list of muktijoddhas from all over the world. “There are several Indians in it, of course, but there are Pakistanis too. These are the people who had the courage to stand up against their own government. They are our friends too,” Maimoon said.
Published in The Express Tribune, September 15th, 2011.
COMMENTS (65)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
sanskrit is no root language. it was a offshoot that ended in a blocked tunnel like Latin.
Reading these comments, I am shocked at the level of insecurity and resentment between the people of these three nations. Learn to live together and respect each other, it is the best way forward. If you continue to discuss history, you will never move into the future.
@narayana murthy: The amount of nonsense in your posts is preposterous!! You abusive language is even more despicable. Putting a belligerent tone in your post will not make them any more credible.
By the way, I am not a native Hindi speaker, but have studied it formally in school for many years. Let me try once again - the Persian/arabic words that you are talking about is used in Urdu not in standard Hindi.
Interestingly enough there is a bit of history which is always ignored, its the period Mujib ruled the country. People liberated this country for freedom and liberty, but the irony is Mujib took this opportunity to impose his autocratic rule making the country 'one party state' by creating "Bakshal' banned news papers and created his own Army 'Rokkhi bahini' and massacre continued. Not any difference then the Saddam with his Bath party and his National guard, but at least during Saddam regime Iraq prospered economically!
@Amit: Brother, we are not propagating greatness of our language. We just want to choose what we want. We do not want Hindi means, we do not want. Just leave us and let us decide what is good for us.
@Amit who says "Unfortunately, you cannot propagate this theory by displaying the same arrogance that you accuse others of."
When did stating the facts become arrogance? If you find one lie in my statements, get back to me. I am knowledgeable and I write what I know.
However, I will tell you what is arrogant here, a Hindi speaker expecting a Bengali to learn Hindi and suggesting that learning other languages is good, while she blissfully remains ignorant of her own ignorance.
Now that is arrogance! If my reply piqued you, then look at the source.
@Rock - I know only Hindi that I learned (textbook Hindi). I don't know to distinguish between Bollywood Hindi and the Hindi you are talking about. By the way, the last time I watched a Bollywood film was 6 years ago.
The textbook Hindi taught me Ek Do Theen and not Ekam Dwitiyam...By the way Ekam, Dwitiyam... is not Sanskrit. Correct Sanskrit version is different.
Narayan Murthy, Hindi/Urdu speaking people who migrate to southern states do their best to learn the local languages. That said, Tamil or Malayalam is really not an easy language to pick up. Probably its rich history and nuances also make it difficult to learn quickly. Tamil speakers, on the other hand, do seem to learn Hindi rather easily. The preponderance of Hindi has more to do with Bollywood and the sheer numbers of Hindi speaking people. This language fight that you are referring to is an old issue bro. Let the sleeping dogs lie. As someone hailing from the cowbelt, I have no hesitation in admitting that the Tamil literature is far richer than Hindi or Urdu. Unfortunately, you cannot propagate this theory by displaying the same arrogance that you accuse others of.
Bengali spoken in Bangladesh is no news. In fact this is called patriotism and nationalism. It may not be pleasant for others but it is the choice of BD people. Who are we who want to see them speak the languages that we like? In certain states in India like Rajasthan, all signs are only in Hindi. I cannot read Hindi and it was my choice to not do any business with the people who do not want it. If I am not welcomed as a tourist I should get the message and take my $$ to some other place. In fact I loved shopping in New Delhi and where I felt more comfortable.
@narayana murthy: No all numbars are sanskrit origin, ekam. dwitiam, tritium, chaturtham. But you are right today hindi is using most of persian words. If you talk about bollywood then they use bpersian words. They started exclusing original hindi words. So bollywood hindi looks like urdu. You are right culture degradaation in north India is much compare to south India. In north Indis culture remains in pocket areas.
@Grace
While some of your comments were true. The rest were disGRACEful. Pun intended.
You say "This was Pakistan’s internal folly that India expoloited fully by staging an insurrection and sending in soldiers."
This is utter propaganda. What India did was use the BSF to train Mukhti Bahini and arm them. India did not involve directly in the conflict, until Pakistan was BRAVE enough (because of their martial race, camels and swords!!!) to launch an across-the-border air attack on our bases.
@Ron.
You are so ignorant.
Hindi's Ek, Do, Theen, Chaar...is derived from Persian.
Several thousand Hindi words are Arabic/Persian.
Besides, South Indian languages have more Sanskrit than Hindi will ever have.
Ron, you just proved my point, Hindi speakers are very ignorant of other cultures and languages. In fact, Hindi speakers are even ignorant of their own culture and language. What a pity.
@Ron: "All Indian languages other than the 4 southern languages have been derived from Sanskrit which is the root language of the entire Indo-European group of languages including English."
The 4 southern classical languages AND languages with origins in Sanskrit ARE ALL our common heritage. PERIOD. I do not see what is there to discuss.
This article and the Bengali-Indian fighting that follows in the discussion has no place in a Pakistani newspaper.
@narayana murthy: Your contention that Hindi is a recent language is incorrect as it is merely a modern form of its predecessor language "Khari Boli" which has existed for a very long time. All Indian languages other than the 4 southern languages have been derived from Sanskrit which is the root language of the entire Indo-European group of languages including English. Since, Hindi is derived from Sanskrit, using the Devnagri is only logical. Hindi does not borrow anything from Arabic or Persian; you are confusing it with Urdu which in India is primarily Hindi with some Arabic and Farsi adjectives thrown in.
@ Dr. Priyanka
I don't think you understand the meaning of the word bigotry. Please look up dictionary and then say where I was a bigot.
I will tell you what bigotry is.
When Hindi speaking people do not want to learn other languages (which includes you Marathi) and then expects Bangladeshis to learn Hindi is bigotry.
I think that Bangladesh should form a union with West Bengal in India and make a greater Bengali confederation. It is true that Bangladeshis have more in common with Indians in general and Indian Bengalis in particular. As for events in 1971, no one denies that taller fairer Pakistanis (Pashtuns, Punjabis, Kashmiris and Baluchis) were dismissive and racist toward the short darker Bangalis in the East. They saw them as a lesser race and it lead to the seeds of discontent that the Indians were able to exploit. This was Pakistan's internal folly that India expoloited fully by staging an insurrection and sending in soldiers. Pakistan fought the 1971 War with one hand tied around its back and Indira Gandhi was only too eager to rectify " historical injustice" done to Hindus in India over the last many centuries. Now that this is over, it's ironic that now Bangalis have yet to reconcile with their liberators from India. This whole talk of Mukti Bahini is nonsense since the so called freedom fighters did very little. It was the Indian army directly and indirectly through covert actions.
@Abhi.let's take your argument that Afghans cheer Indian team's win.have you seen Nepalese young kids playing cricket and guess which team they love??Pakistan despite their cultural and religious affinity with India.
I am now fed up with India-Pakistan controversy.Let's live peacefully and respect each other.Make differences strength than cause for unnecessary verbal duel.
@Manoj.I agree with you comments.Let the history be part of history only to take good lessons from it.Let's keep sanctity of each entity in Sub-continent and move forward for opening borders and enhancing people to people contacts.That will lessen your supposed 92% Pakistani hatred towards Indian or vice versa.We cannot carry on like the way we are now for longer period of time.It will only deprive the people for their basic right to have good life in this part of the world.
All my Bangladeshi friends and people I have met in London (even Awami league supporters) think India staged Mumbai attacks! They were happy when Pakistan became nuclear power!
Of course Bangalis were treated badly in 1971. 'But terrible things happen in all wars' as said by my Bangladeshi friend when Iraq war started!
I have met hundreds of Bangladeshi people in London and I must say that we are natural allies. We feel the pain of Palestine, while our Indian friends take pride on having 'alliance' with militarily advanced Israel.
A Bangladeshi will come to Pakistani to ask about 'When is Eid or prayer time etc'... If I am treated bad by my Pakistani people, can I avoid them all? Despite our mistakes, we have a lot more in common with Bangladesh than India will ever have. When I am gonna die, I will be buried like my Bangladeshi brother. No one else will help me in grave but my faith!!!
First, being a citizen of Pakistan, i am ashamed and will be feeling this for my whole life on what we have done with Bangladesh. Because, Bangladeshi were the pioneer of the Movement of Pakistan.
Second, i have interacted with so many Bangladeshi youth, so, there is no such bad feelings about Pakistan in Bangladesh.
The third thing, we have lost Bangladesh partly due to our dictatorship policies and partly due to Indian Intervention and jealousy with Pakistan. But the Indian must remember that we will be strike back on you, because we Pakhtoon of Pakistan can forget everything but can't forget our revenge. And we can wait thousands years to take our revenge.
@Rock: Your comment is not worth replying but still I will do that as it concerns my nationality and bring you people down to reality. I am a 100% born & breed bengali bangladeshi and live in Dhaka. I have never been to pakistan or india but do read forgein newspapers. I have an obligation to clear the misconception arising from an article that twists facts about my country and its people. Indians should stop being delusional and face the basic & ovious fact that not only pakistanis but its other neighbours are against indian haegemonistic policies in the reagion and creating problems for your neighbour cannot fullfill your dream of becoming a great power.
@Bangladeshi: Hey fake bangladeshi you are good timepass for us. Thanks for contributing fake things.
@ author Why do you want Bangladeshis to learn Hindhi ? If you are going to other countries, try to learn or go for crash courses of that countries language and speak. I can not understand how north indian try to push Hindhi in a unruly manner. They say it ll help south Indians and all. In my opinion only English helps. It is a universal language. Even when France and Germany officially communicate they do it in English. I am from Tamilnadu, many Biharis, UP people, Oriya people come here for construction works. They do not have any communication problem. Tamilnadu also never had any problem in progressing without Hindi. Hindi speaking states are the poorest and worst managed states in India. Tamilnadu being 7% of India's population, 11th state by area contributes 4 th by GDP. Our GDP is almost 60% Pakistanis national GDP. Yes we did this without Hindi, only Tamil. I am not a chauvinistic. I am trying to tell any language is not a barrier to growth at all. One needs their mother tongue and English. That's it.
Special Thanks to Jyoti Malhotra who published my harsh remarks. I very much appreciate her unbiased publishing of comments here. I may or may not agree with the about her article, however, I do have a great respect for her to let other half of story be told as it is. I wish her best of luck and would like to see more of her analysis on this forum.
@Bangladeshi: thanks for puting everything now atleast I know you are not bangladeshi.
haha bangladeshi maybe u should visit a city called new delhi,ever heard of that name?come to my city friend and sit in the cycle rikshaws and thou shall find thy brethren.also read this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illegalimmigrationin_India
i hope u dont tell me this is a hindu zionist conspiracy on wikipedia.and bro u remind me of a very famous urdu word "ehsaan faramosh".khuda hafiz.
@Mishra: India just took advantage of the situation and what ever help they gave us was for their strategic interest, even a child can understand that. Helping us doesn't mean that we will be eternally grateful to you even when you abduct & kill our citizens at the border everyday and ship illegal drugs into our country. Indians are the ones who doesn't have any pride violating every single bilateral treaty they singed( e.g water sharing treaty & the 3 bigha corridor treaty) and now they are shamelessly asking for corridor through our country. India could not prove its absurd claim about illegal immigrants . you just put up this magical illegal immigrant figure when you run out of logical statements to prove your point. Why would bangladeshis want to go a state like W.bengal which suffers from more poverty than us. Kolkata is no where near Dhaka or Chittagong. I hope indians come down to earth and face reality rather than in the dream world flattering themselves.
It appears that the the article is written to please acertain section of Bengla deshi society and Indians ,otherwise there is no substance in its finding.Lot of my friends from Pakistan ,canada & USA frequently visit Bengladesh and have their business interests ,but none of them had any such expereience as narrated in the story.
@Qaisrani fair enuf,can u explain me why afghans cheered india when they won in semi final.i read a report abt afghan refugees celebrating with gunfire in peshawar.so plzz dont attach much importance to these issues as im sure afghans are much closer in culture to pakistan than india.
@bangladeshi,mere bhai if u despise india that much(which is your right) and have nothing in common with us and are assured that we persecute muslims then why dont u tell ur countrymen to stop this hypocricy of illegal migration to our country.
@Bangladeshi:
Dude you are Pakistani not Bangladeshi, look like you guys are ashamed of your own nationality.Good bye.
@Qaisrani:
It seems, every Pakistani think that Bangladeshi loves Pakistan, becuase they are treated well when ever they visit Bangladesh. Let me tell you this the culture of the subcontinent that even if your enemy comes to your door steps, you respect him and offer your best of the hospitality. This happens to Pakistani who visits India or to an indian who visits Pakistan. But fact remains and one latest survey proves that 92% Pakistani are happy that they got separated from India. Let us accept this fact, that we are all happy in our own country. India, Bangaldesh and Pakistan are three independent soverign nation, we all should accept and respect this fact, then only we will grow and prosperous together.
@narayana murthy: we don't need any advice from you about how to progress. We have been given a system 1400 years ago by Allah(swt). Bangladesh is a homonenous community of 90% muslims and hindus christian & other minorities are given equal rights unlike in india where the main perpetrator of the gujrat riots is set to become the next PM of india. We consider pakistani and afgans as our brothers and understands that their main obstacle is US interference. Saying india can take over Bangladesh anytime shows you hegemonic mentality. Just try to take us over and see what happens. India can't even control its seven north eastern states and then their is the moaist insurgency & that's why it is trying to get the corridor through bangladesh through the awami gov . we have nothing similar with you other than the language of west bengal & even there the dialect is different than ours & not a single expatriat bangladeshi identify themselves as indian and I know this as I have went to the UK couple of times, it is just your wishful thinking. The problem with india is that it imagines itself as some sort of superpower when it has the worlds largest poverty. Sort out your problems first before advising us what to do.
I have a question for the author.Could you explain Bangladeshi fans supporting Pakistani team whenever there is Cricket match between India and Pakistani teams many times even in Dhaka,not to mention recent Cricket World Cup.If they have more respect for history then why they support Pakistani team? In fact past is past now and young generation cheers every thing coming from anywhere in the world.I have many Bangladeshi friends,who speak and understand Urdu/Hindi fluently.Not to mention because of Bollywood movies.
Without us, Bangladesh would never have been liberated, yet Bangladeshis have the audacity of being ungrateful all the time. They might have an independent steak but where is their "pride" when they send thousands of illegals into West Bengal and then further into our country? Why does that pride disappear when it comes to knocking at our doors with their bottomless begging bowl? How disgusting can one be?
@Natu you must be delusional in thinking that bangladesh is integarting with india culturally. Average bangladeshis do not dance in weeding ceremonies but very few elites in the hierarchy does and this does not show cultural similarity.Even hindus here do not have bollywoood style weeding. Guess you visited a multimillion $ familyweeding who hardly even stay 6 months in here. And as far as economic integration is concerned ,you are right India is destroying and taking over our major industries after the current india loving GOV came to power.
@Rock thanks to India & AL goverment we currently have the most corrupt and most politicized judiciary in the world. Any gov critic are threatened & harassed while journalist, op politicians and civil right activist (even awami suppoters) who went against the gov are rotting in jail. Call spade a spade & don't act as if you know anything about our country , your comment is a mockery of the victims of Awami terrorism.
Proud Pakistani, and that is the tragedy. People from India come here and bicker and troll all day, while their own country is worse than the Sub-Saharan Africa. And on top of that, they will proclaim from the rooftops that as Indians, they rarely even think about Pakistan - why post here day in and out then instead of engaging their own people in fruitful discussions or doing something to help the hundreds of millions of people in back-breaking sub-saharan poverty. But then, defaming Islam and fighting with Muslims is more entertaining for these people than helping people, right?
@bangladeshi,are u kidding me.why the hell would india even think of occupying your country man.dont attach so much importance to yourself.dont we have enuf poor ppl already to feed in our country?the primary reason for indian interference in 1971 was the influx of huge numbers of refugees from east pakistan which would have broken the back of our economy.even today there are 2 crore bangladeshis living illegally in our country and we just cant send them back because of the minority appeasement card played by successive govts(even by bjp !!!!!!)
@Bangladeshi: If you are real bangladesh then let you know India does not want land of any country. If you are fake bangladeshi then continue with conspiracy theory we will like to know who will be the next Zaid hamid,
@Proud Pakistani: hey planned city resident, you need to visit planned cities in subcontinent. There are many planned city in India you have visit them to get feeling of islamabad. Remember planned city are created on the productivity of unplanned cities. Never ever underestimate unplanned cities contibution to the economy since you are living in subcotinent.
@Bangladeshi
Your grudge towards a bigger successful and powerful neighbor, is understandable. As per your admission, you want to take Bangladesh on a communal path and not a secular one. It's your choice. However, if you want a prosperous Bangladesh, you would choose secular path. You want to end up being a Pakistan or an Afghanistan, then your country will need more and more people with your mentality.
When BNP wins, it's a democratic selection, when Awami wins, it's a conspiracy?!!! However, India rigging the elections, sounds ridiculous. Just like a weak, failing, poor neighbor, you are putting the blame on India.
And believe me, India has no intention of taking over Bangladeh. If it did, it wouldn't be hard to do, no matter how independent you are. And the fact is, you are not independent. You have a romantic notion of being independent. You are not independent on your economy, security, infrastructure even identity. Many Bangladeshis living abroad, call themselves as Indians, to escape the humiliation that is to follow. I have experienced it first hand.
@Junaid Saleem
You are completely wrong on both attempts.
For what you replied to BABLOO --
In 1962, Indians captured by China or Chinese captured by India had not committed war crimes. They were not involved in the second biggest genocide of the century. They were not involved in mass rapes. Also, it was a clear case of war between two countries. A third country was not involved.
For what you replied to Ali Tanoli --
Don't humiliate yourself by calling 1971 as an internal matter of Pakistan. Because of the systemic genocide, millions of Bangladeshis had taken refuge in India. Do you have any idea how big a burden is that on a country that was economically weak and growing at a "Hindu rate of growth"?
Besides, do you even know that it was your army, who attacked Indian airbase to pre-empt an impending attack from India?
On my recent visits to Mumbai Dhaka and Karachi all i ever saw was huge huge amounts of poverty equivalent to that of Sub-Sahara African countries. Or maybe it's the fact that I love Islamabad or small cities too much.
I congratulate Bangladesh judiciary which has taken very good measures in recent years. Very bold steps. Institutions, administration and civil society still weak. Need lots of improvement in the country. Still positive aspect is bangladesh is right on track.
@Junaid Saleem: what kashmir you are talking about? Your army already gifted part of kashmir land to china talk about that land first. Cut out the conspiracy theory and start admiring election result. You made bangladesh by not accepting election result. Is it clear now?
@ c b bahar Thanks for telling the truth i know some of that but who litsen to us.
@Babloo: Answer to you question is the same When you went to war with China and your Army Surrendered in 1962 . They first took them as POW and fed those Hungry Indian soldiers Who would have died of Hunger and in that freezing environment . they they took as POW and returned to India. Should they kicked their rears or what they did was right? That what answers your question. @Al Tanoli: As far as the conflict was concerned , It was a Pakistan's internal issue and any foreign intervention was an act of terrorism at the state level. India Had No Business In there. Because If You Justify Indian Intervention into East Pakistan then Whatever Indian Army is doing in Kashmir, with the same Logic China's intervention would be 100% Justified there. Bengalis could have separated naturally even after that internal conflict and would have gone their way separate from Pakistan , would be a different matter. But Indian hand and Army invasion was an act of terrorism and it has future affect on relationship in the region. As I said earlier , whoever will justify Indian invasion of 1971 will automatically Justify Indian Kashmir Invasion by China with the same token. Those who did not read Genral Manekshaw's Biography can go and check it out. In which he admitted that to provoke hatred towards PAK Army in East Pakistan, He ordered 40,000 PAK Army uniform which were Provided to Indian troops and intelligence who crossed the Border and carried out the worse atrocities with the civilian population including, assassination, target killings, and rapes.. It was all done way before the PAK army even involved into conflict. Such atrocities provided reason for Bengalis to Join Indian funded and trained Mukti bahni and wage a war against Pakistan army. The terrorism was Funded and started by Indai. Those who eant to check on that, they are most welcome.
Bangladeshi kids watch Hindi TV cartoon channels, women watch saas bahu serials and youth watch Bollywood entertainment. Check the Bangladeshi wedding videos on YouTube. They all dance to Indian Punjabi, Bollywood songs. Those songs are a MUST.
I have travelled in Bangladesh, lived with Bangladeshi ppl. The preponderance of Indian TV channels make them rely on Indian content for their entertainment apart from their own Bengali channels. All in all they are unlikely to be anti-Indian like Pakistanis are though some Bangladeshi ppl nurse anti-Indian feelings but not to the level of paranoia (the kind we see, hear from some Pakistani quarters).
Now Bangladesh is integrating with Indian economy (read with a series of measures by the leadership of India, Bangladesh), culture (peripherally through Indian TV channels) and may be politically in 30-40 years time under SAARC framework without compromising their Bangladeshi national identity. However the constant threat of establishing a Greater Bangladesh is always on cards among Jamati groups in tandem with BNP who see increasing Muslim population in Paschim Banga, Assam and Tripura as a positive sign in that direction.
Almost a fiction to satisfy a special quarter. I don't know where to go, how to laugh when Shahriar Kabir is attributed to be one of the famous historians of our country ! Muktijuddahs are no more respected now by un-employed millions of educated youth as 30% jobs are reserved for this special class. One thing journalists like this one always try to camouflage the fact that thousands of non Bengalis were brutally annihilated. In fact no other country in present world saw such degree of ethnic cleansing as it was done in Bangladesh. Entire townships of Bihari Muslims who immigrated from Bihar, India after partition of 1947 were uprooted. Thanks to Ms. Malhotra !!!
Well, Khalida Zia and her husband ruled Bangladesh for a pretty long time and tried their best to turn it into another Pakistan, but, thankfully, they failed miserably. There is something special about Bengalis, they are fiercely independent people, it is almost impossible for Mullhas to cow them down by brandishing the sword of religious bigotry, in contrast to the spectacular success of Mullahs in Pakistan. Today, Mullhas are ruling the roost in Pakistan and mainly responsible for the current pathetic state of affairs in the country. On the other hand Bangladesh is on the right track and a good future awaits them. Good luck Banglas!
@ Babloo If Bhutto had lived till this day he might answer your question we cant so sorry maan.
The civil war in Pakistan leading to creation of Bangladesh was fought solely on the Bangladeshi soil and had gruesome cruelty written all over it. However, the fact is that at the end of the war, India denied Bangladesh requests to hand over the officers of Pak army who Bangladesh alleged to have committed numerous war-crimes, who were prisoners of war in India. Instead, India handed over the Pakistani POWs to Pakistan and denied Bangladesh request for their trial in hope of making relations with W Pakistan better. Was India wrong ? What do readers think ?
Miss Jyoti, i spent a year in Bangladesh and mostly in Dhaka i didnt get any such feeling nor i saw people talking about separation from Pakistan...So i can say your article is far away from reality and depend only on the perception of 3 people... I heard Atif Aslam songs played in many music stores, almost all the older people can talk URDU but new generation cant talk becuase they are learning Bengali & English. But interestingly majority can understand urdu or hindi. I met many rich people from UP of India migrated after partition and have very good business. They use URDU language at home and at workplace even :) I saw University students prefer to talk with you in English language just like in India & Pakistan.
The only thing which surprised me over there was the poverty in every place and the misconception of people about Pakistan because they think that the Dhaka is ultra modern and might be a best city in South Asia.