Actor Daniel Baldwin has claimed that Hollywood celebrities are engaged in a bidding war to purchase tapes allegedly recorded at Sean “Diddy” Combs’ infamous parties.
Speaking on the PBD podcast, Baldwin suggested that these tapes, said to be in Diddy’s possession, could potentially implicate high-profile individuals in criminal activities. “I’ve heard from friends who are attorneys… there’s a bidding war going on right now,” Baldwin stated, implying that the tapes are being sold to protect reputations.
Daniel Baldwin, brother of Alec Baldwin, has reportedly claimed that former Hollywood agents and current attorneys informed him of an ongoing bidding war over alleged tapes linked to Diddy.
— Shadow of Ezra (@ShadowofEzra) December 15, 2024
According to Baldwin, these tapes are being sold to Hollywood elites implicated in… pic.twitter.com/9REkqbjt4i
Baldwin did not clarify who is selling the tapes but hinted that Diddy might be behind it. The allegations come amid Diddy’s ongoing legal battles, including sex trafficking and coercion charges. Diddy is currently in jail in New York, facing multiple accusations involving high-profile figures and events.
The controversy intensified as Jay-Z was recently added to a lawsuit initially filed against Diddy. The lawsuit alleges that the two artists sexually assaulted a 13-year-old girl at an after-party for the 2000 MTV VMAs, which was hosted by Diddy. While Jay-Z has denied the claims, calling out the attorney’s motives, the victim has admitted to "inconsistencies" in her allegations during an NBC News interview.
This unfolding saga has captivated public attention, with Baldwin’s claims adding a new dimension to the controversy. The allegations, if substantiated, could have far-reaching implications for Hollywood’s elite and the broader entertainment industry. For now, the bidding war for the tapes and its potential revelations remain a subject of heated speculation.
COMMENTS
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ