Constitutional amendments designed solely to keep me imprisoned: Imran Khan

PTI's founding leader claims NAB laws were amended to forgive billions in corruption.


News Desk September 16, 2024
PTI founder Imran Khan. PHOTO: FILE

Listen to article

Imran Khan, founding leader of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), has condemned the anticipated constitutional changes.

During an informal conversation with journalists at Rawalpindi's Adiala Jail, Imran claimed the government was pursuing the establishment of a new constitutional court out of fear of the Supreme Court.

He further claimed that the recent amendments are designed to keep him in prison and to dismantle the judiciary, Express News reported.

“The rulers have decided to destroy the judiciary,” Imran said. “All this is being done to cover up election fraud and protect their corruption.”

Imran criticised the amendments to the National Accountability Bureau (NAB) laws, claiming they were used to forgive billions in corruption.

He argued that the government’s actions threaten the rule of law and increase political instability through threats to judges and the elimination of political opposition.

Highlighting economic concerns, he noted that 4,000 Pakistani companies have been registered in Dubai during the past six months.

He attributed the country’s inflation to government reliance on loans and highlighted that the elite, with assets abroad, are indifferent to the financial plight of ordinary citizens.

The PTI Founder also pointed out that Mohsin Naqvi’s wife’s $500 million property was revealed in the Dubai Leaks, and further cl;aimed that those behind the amendments have 'hidden wealth abroad.'

Announcing a peaceful protest in Lahore, he called on the public to defend their rights and the judiciary by protesting on September 21.

“This is a matter of our country’s future,” Imran declared. “We will not remain silent and will protest vigorously.”

COMMENTS

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ