Something's brewing in the 6... Drake is making moves. The rapper recently followed a mysterious Instagram account, and shortly after, 100 GB of new material was released, including new music, unreleased footage, and alternate artwork.
This release is a dream come true for Drake fans dating back to 2010.
However, the most intriguing part is what Drake did next.
Instead of lying low, he followed another enigmatic account, hinting at "round 2" of a significant "fight."
The account, named "Indigo Child," doesn't have many followers, but its bio is what catches the eye.
The information seems to reference Drake's recent 100 GB release and teases more to come. "First account made some people anxious," the bio reads.
"Here we go again round 2 'FIGHT.'"
Fans were confused by the rollout of the 100 GB release, and while "round 2" could mean another material drop, the word "fight" suggests something bigger.
Drake knows the implications of following an account with such a provocative bio and appears to be leaning into it.
Fans have been eagerly awaiting Drake to continue his battle with Kendrick Lamar after the lukewarm response to the "Heart Part 6" diss.
Many agreed that the 6 God stumbled with that one, but there's speculation that more is on the way.
DJ Akademiks nearly confirmed this during a July stream.
"It's really never over," the DJ said.
"I can't wait to hear the first sneak diss."
Ak started to share more details but stopped short. "Matter of fact," he added, "I won't even tell y'all what I heard."
Furthermore, industry veterans like Ice Cube have hinted that the battle could reignite at any time.
In June, Cube appeared on the Big Pod with Shaq and advised Kendrick Lamar to stay prepared.
He believed Lamar had won the battle so far but emphasized that the story isn't over. "[It] don't mean Drake can't get off the canvas," Cube noted.
"If I was Kendrick, I'd stay cocked and loaded…." We're eagerly anticipating Drake's next move.
COMMENTS
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ