![british prime minister boris johnson us president joe biden france s president emmanuel macron canadian prime minister justin trudeau australia s prime minister scott morrison german chancellor angela merkel south africa s president cyril ramaphosa and south korea s president moon jae in attend a working session during g7 summit in carbis bay cornwall britain june 12 2021 photo reuters british prime minister boris johnson us president joe biden france s president emmanuel macron canadian prime minister justin trudeau australia s prime minister scott morrison german chancellor angela merkel south africa s president cyril ramaphosa and south korea s president moon jae in attend a working session during g7 summit in carbis bay cornwall britain june 12 2021 photo reuters](https://i.tribune.com.pk/media/images/Leaders-attend-a-working-session-during-G7-summit-1623583651-0/Leaders-attend-a-working-session-during-G7-summit-1623583651-0.jpg)
Leaders of the Group of Seven (G7) nations on Saturday called for the development and adoption of technical standards to keep artificial intelligence (AI) "trustworthy", saying governance of the technology has not kept pace with its growth.
While the G7 leaders, meeting in Hiroshima, Japan, recognised that the approaches to achieving "the common vision and goal of trustworthy AI may vary", they said in a statement the rules for digital technologies like AI should be "in line with our shared democratic values".
The agreement came after the European Union, which participates in the G7, inched closer this month to passing legislation to regulate AI technology, potentially the world's first comprehensive AI law that could form a precedent among the advanced economies.
"We want AI systems to be accurate, reliable, safe and non-discriminatory, regardless of their origin," European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said on Friday.
The G7 leaders said they "need to immediately take stock of the opportunities and challenges of generative AI", a subset of the technology popularised by the ChatGPT app.
OpenAI's ChatGPT pushed Elon Musk and a group of AI experts to raise an alarm in March calling for a six-month pause in developing more powerful systems, citing potential risks to society. A month later, EU lawmakers urged world leaders to find ways to control AI technologies, saying they were developing faster than expected.
The United States so far has taken a cautious approach on governing AI, with President Joe Biden last month saying it remained to be seen whether AI is dangerous. Sam Altman, CEO of Microsoft-backed OpenAI, told a Senate panel on Tuesday that the US should consider licensing and testing requirements for development of AI models.
Japan, this year's chair of G7, has been even more accommodative, pledging support for public and industrial adoption of AI while monitoring its risks. "It's important to properly deal with both the potentials and risks," Prime Minister Fumio Kishida told the government's AI council last week.
The Western nations' differing approaches to AI are in contrast to China's restrictive policy. Its cyberspace regulator in April unveiled draft measures to align generative AI-powered services with the country's core socialist values.
While acknowledging differences on how AI should be regulated, the G7 leaders agreed on Friday to create a ministerial forum dubbed the "Hiroshima AI process" to discuss issues around generative AI, such as copyrights and disinformation, by the end of this year.
The leaders also urged international organizations such as the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development to consider analysis on the impact of policy developments.
The summit followed a G7 digital ministers' meeting last month, where its members - the US, Japan, Germany, Britain, France, Italy, Canada and the EU - said they should adopt "risk-based" AI rules.
The EU and US are also expected to exchange views on the emerging technologies at the Trade and Technology Council in Sweden on May 30-31.
COMMENTS
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ