WB rejects 'unfounded' reports of delay in loan for Pakistan

Country director says projects shared with board after 'due process' and 'based on the proposed projects’ readiness'


News Desk January 20, 2023
The World Bank. photo: file

World Bank Country Director for Pakistan Najy Benhassine on Thursday rejected reports of a delay in loan approval for Pakistan.

Taking to Twitter, Benhassine said that press reports about a World Bank decision to delay approval of potential Bank operations in Pakistan are "unfounded".

He added that the tentative board approval dates of all proposed operations and their funding are clear.

He further maintained that the WB decides the timing for sharing project proposals with the Board for consideration after "due process" and "based on the proposed projects’ readiness".

Earlier this week, the media reported that the World Bank has delayed the approval of two loans, worth $1.1 billion, until the next fiscal year, adding that it also opposed slapping a flood levy on imports, creating a new hole in an already ambitious $32 billion annual financing plan.

Read WB diverts $615m for flood-relief work

This decision to withhold approval of the second Resilient Institutions for Sustainable Economy (RISE-II) loan worth $450 million and the second Programme for Affordable Energy (PACE-II) worth $600 million would have been a major jolt for the government.

The government had hoped to receive an approval for at least the $450 million loan in January, which would have unlocked another $450 million from the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank – which had pegged a $450 million loan with the approval of the World Bank’s RISE-II.

The coalition government is already struggling to revive the International Monetary Fund (IMF) programme. Thus, this decision by the World Bank would have created a hole of $1.5 billion against the government’s annual financing plan.

COMMENTS

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ