Govt crafts plan for use of Roosevelt Hotel

Plan for leasing out the site, reopening of the hotel being explored


Zafar Bhutta September 14, 2022
The Roosevelt Hotel in New York. PHOTO: FILE

print-news
ISLAMABAD:

The government has decided to revive the plan for leasing out the site of the Roosevelt Hotel in New York to set up a joint venture project for prospective mixed-use development and agreed to explore the option of reopening the hotel following protest from the employees union.

According to sources, the Cabinet Committee on Privatisation had approved the leasing of the Roosevelt Hotel, as the best-suited mode of privatisation and directed the Privatisation Commission (PC) on July 2, 2020 to initiate the process for appointing a financial adviser.

However, the PC halted the process for the appointment of the financial adviser because of the litigation by the Tethyan Copper Company (TCC) over the Reko Diq mines, the sources told The Express Tribune.

Read'Profitable for 99 years, Roosevelt suffered loss of $1.5 million last year only'

Later, the sources added, after out-of-court settlement with the TCC, the PC was asked to reinitiate the process after the Office of the Attorney General for Pakistan advised the Aviation Division to go ahead with the appointment of the financial adviser.

The Roosevelt Hotel is owned by the Pakistan International Airlines (PAI) through a PIA-Investment Limited. The PIA-IL holds its stakes through a subsidiary, registered in the British Virgin Islands. The hotel, located at a highly priced location, was closed in December 2020.

The Aviation Division had submitted a summary for the Economic Coordination Committee (ECC) of the cabinet on ‘Challenges to Roosevelt Hotel, New York, Property of PIA-Investment Limited (PIS-IL) and Way Forward’ with the request for an in-camera session on the subject.

The aviation secretary, in his capacity as Chairman PIA-IL Board, briefed the ECC in a recent meeting that the hotel business had been badly affected because of the Covid-19 pandemic around the world, forcing the PIA-IL to shut down the hotel.

Also read: Roosevelt Hotel closed for good

The Aviation Division further shared two serious issues facing PIA-IL management – one related to illegal demand from the union employees and the other was the issue of land marking of Roosevelt Hotel Corporation (RHC).

It was stated that the aviation secretary along with PIA-IL Board members held discussions with all concerned, led by Pakistan’s Ambassador to the US. The post-visit report was also submitted to the Prime Minister’s Office on May 23, 2022.

The Prime Minister’s Office then directed the aviation secretary to brief the PIA-IL board of directors on the RHC affairs, firm up the proposal and presented it at the competent forum for further deliberations.

Subsequently, after thorough deliberation on May 31, 2022, it was proposed that in view of foregoing onerous union demands, and to mitigate the risk of landmarking, the government should reconsider its earlier decision regarding permanent closure of the hotel.

The PIA-IL and the RHC were asked to explore the option of re-opening the hotel either on its own or through a third-party short-term leasing arrangements. After due diligence, the proposal would be taken up at the competent forum.

Meanwhile, the PIA-IL and the RHC would continue negotiations with the union, and try to restore the status quo. The PC was also requested to expedite its earlier decision of financial leasing of the hotel site for setting up a joint venture project for mixed-use development.

On July 16, the ECC directed the Aviation Division to submit details of the cost of reopening of the hotel. The aviation secretary informed the ECC that the tentative cost of re-opening was $3.29 million, adding that the exact cost could be available, once the bids were called.

The Aviation Division also proposed that representatives of the finance and the law divisions might also be included in the team of the PIA-IL management, which would hold negotiations with the union.

The ECC considered the summary submitted by Aviation Division on ‘Challenges to Roosevelt Hotel, New York, Property of PIA-Investment Limited (PIA-IL) and Way Forward’ and approved the proposals of exploring option to reopen the hotel.

COMMENTS (2)

Alija Khan | 2 years ago | Reply Choor Generals Thier paltoo Politicans eating the Cake of Reosevelt Hotel as Mal I Ghanimat
Rebirth | 2 years ago | Reply The nation owes a huge debt to those who helped fight the case in the British Virgin Islands BVI . We always thank them for the Reko case generally but never the BVI victory where the company that owns the hotel is registered. Specifically we must acknowledge the contributions of the International Disputes Unit IDU under the Attorney General who at the time was Khalid Javed Khan. It perturbed many people especially a segment of the American deep state hostile towards Pakistanis since the 1990s that we won these cases after more than a decade and after losing hundreds of millions of dollars in litigation fees including hiring foreign international law firms. The so called out of court settlement is actually the Government of Pakistan buying the stake owned by the Chilean company. It wasn t a fine but rather an amount paid to become a partner and also our renegotiation meant we would get a greater share of the profits. We also saved these hotels including the one in Paris. A segment of the US deep state also referred to as the American radicals of the 1960s could not tolerate the fact that Pakistanis own a midtown Manhattan hotel. But the ownership of Astoria Waldorf a hotel that their own presidents avoid was never up for discussion or concern to them for obvious reasons. Not in my backyard or NIMBY As in most of them reside in New York or handle politicians from there. So why the hostility towards those who helped the government of Pakistan win the case Why try and discredit them Diverting attention from Waldorf I d say so.
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ